Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Southwest eying international routes? >

Southwest eying international routes?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Southwest eying international routes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2014, 09:20 PM
  #51  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There are not many constants in the airline industry. One however has always been when a airline starts a new market airlines already in that market do everything to aide in providing a safe operation. They normally share everything they can from a operational basis to assist the startup. That includes carrying the check airman from the new airline into the new airport on jumpseats and sharing every detail you on best practices. Alaska is the first airline I have ever seen refuse that courtesy ever. It's sad for the entire industry.
If I understand your post correctly, you are stating that Alaska denied DL Tech Pilot jumpseaters in and out of JNU? If that is what you are stating, that is absolutely false. Alaska opened up their jumpseat and forwarded a comprehensive package of safety oriented material related to JNU ops.

The above Sailingfun statement is not accurate. Contact the DL TechPilot department. Ask Chip...He and others will verify the jumpseat rides, invitations to JNU safety conferences, and comprehensive operational documents Alaska offered and shared.

Last edited by cecilia; 07-27-2014 at 09:32 PM.
cecilia is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 01:44 AM
  #52  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by cecilia View Post
If I understand your post correctly, you are stating that Alaska denied DL Tech Pilot jumpseaters in and out of JNU? If that is what you are stating, that is absolutely false. Alaska opened up their jumpseat and forwarded a comprehensive package of safety oriented material related to JNU ops.

The above Sailingfun statement is not accurate. Contact the DL TechPilot department. Ask Chip...He and others will verify the jumpseat rides, invitations to JNU safety conferences, and comprehensive operational documents Alaska offered and shared.

While I can see how it looks otherwise, I think sailingfun was referring to only Delta not receiving access to the RNP approach.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 03:29 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: DL 7ER F/O
Posts: 249
Default

Just because DL does not have access to the lowest RNP approach to JNU right now does not mean we are unsafe, we are just not as capable as AS to get in there.

If AS invested the funds to get the lower RNP approach, DL should not just get it for free. However, if public funds were used to obtain that lower certification, then DL should be allowed access.
Rudder is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 09:43 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Pelican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 737 f/o
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by Rudder View Post
Just because DL does not have access to the lowest RNP approach to JNU right now does not mean we are unsafe, we are just not as capable as AS to get in there.

If AS invested the funds to get the lower RNP approach, DL should not just get it for free. However, if public funds were used to obtain that lower certification, then DL should be allowed access.
Rudder- I agree with your post. None of us think DL is less safe going into JNU, just have higher minimums. I've heard AS has invested over $40 million of their own funds into the JNU RNP program. I don't know if there were any public subsidies in addition.

I could see the multiple wind gauges around the area being public but would that mandate our entire RNP program to be public because we use them? Kind of like a CAT III facility is public but up to your company to train to it, use it, improve minimums with HUDs etc.

With the billion dollar quarterly profits DL is posting, $40 Million is a drop in the bucket if they choose to develop their own program. Any word if they are?
Pelican is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 10:58 AM
  #55  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Rudder View Post

If AS invested the funds to get the lower RNP approach, DL should not just get it for free.
There will come a time where it will be public domain. I refer you to the Telecommunications Act which broke up the original AT&T. IT was broken up into 8 Baby Bells, and deregulated the industry which then basically gave any of the upstart players access to the infrastructure that AT&T had laid all over the planet. If that doesn't work for ya, how about drug patents? Ever buy generic?

Or perhaps a better idea would be for Delta to have the runway resurfaced at our expense.
tsquare is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 12:52 PM
  #56  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by cecilia View Post
If I understand your post correctly, you are stating that Alaska denied DL Tech Pilot jumpseaters in and out of JNU? If that is what you are stating, that is absolutely false. Alaska opened up their jumpseat and forwarded a comprehensive package of safety oriented material related to JNU ops.

The above Sailingfun statement is not accurate. Contact the DL TechPilot department. Ask Chip...He and others will verify the jumpseat rides, invitations to JNU safety conferences, and comprehensive operational documents Alaska offered and shared.
Confident. Specific. Names.

I'm going to have to say I believe you.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-28-2014, 12:57 PM
  #57  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
Rudder- I agree with your post. None of us think DL is less safe going into JNU, just have higher minimums. I've heard AS has invested over $40 million of their own funds into the JNU RNP program. I don't know if there were any public subsidies in addition.

I could see the multiple wind gauges around the area being public but would that mandate our entire RNP program to be public because we use them? Kind of like a CAT III facility is public but up to your company to train to it, use it, improve minimums with HUDs etc.

With the billion dollar quarterly profits DL is posting, $40 Million is a drop in the bucket if they choose to develop their own program. Any word if they are?
Yes. I cannot via my phone link it but if you go to jetcareers you'll see the Delta guy talking about it. You have to google the title but I think it was, sigh, alaska vs delta or something. May need to drop JNU into the search.

Thats where I got the information about thresholds being moved, someone mentioned about the runway expansion and a few google searches later you can pull up all of these government documents on JNU projects. In there you see where AS was pushing back against threshold changes due to the fact it would invalidate the RNP approaches they have and they could not get those back without redoing the whole thing like Delta is doing now. This was because the certification process changed in 2002. Those documents I'd have to find but I linked them in that previous JNU love fest. And I do believe the thresholds were not moved, but you know better than I. When the government solicited comments that was what came up from AS.

Delta is evidently in the midst and I guess the RNP will be available for next summer's season. Evidently the 737 will begin training on it soon although i am surprised they'd move away from the 757. Or maybe it was the 757 that will start training. Can't remember.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-29-2014, 12:34 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AKpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B-737 Capt
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There are not many constants in the airline industry. One however has always been when a airline starts a new market airlines already in that market do everything to aide in providing a safe operation. They normally share everything they can from a operational basis to assist the startup. That includes carrying the check airman from the new airline into the new airport on jumpseats and sharing every detail you on best practices. Alaska is the first airline I have ever seen refuse that courtesy ever. It's sad for the entire industry.
You are wrong. I flew into JNU more than once a week Apr-June. There were NO jump seat restrictions for any airline. All welcome. Stop creating drama where there is none.
AKpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jparker371
Compass Airlines
9413
03-01-2016 08:57 AM
CRJAV8OR
Major
0
03-08-2012 09:07 AM
ehe2
Regional
34
06-25-2009 06:17 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-31-2005 09:35 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices