Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Southwest eying international routes? >

Southwest eying international routes?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Southwest eying international routes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2014, 06:27 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Bahahahahahaha!!!!! Bravo! However they'd better get their *** in gear and start laying some EMAS down. Just as importantly they really need to smooth some of the taxiways down there for all the geniuses that think taxiing at 30 kts is normal.
Why so slow?
ClippedWing is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 07:30 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Touche'... That was funny, actually. But wrong. Air Lines.
Maybe it is in Atlanta, but to the English speaking world it's AIRLINES!

air·line
ˈe(ə)rˌlīn/
noun
plural noun: airlines
1.
an organization providing a regular public service of air transportation on one or more routes.
shoelu is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 07:59 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
Maybe it is in Atlanta, but to the English speaking world it's AIRLINES!

air·line
ˈe(ə)rˌlīn/
noun
plural noun: airlines
1.
an organization providing a regular public service of air transportation on one or more routes.
lolwut?

so because "airlines" is a word, that trumps "air" and "lines" being used separately?

Oh and FYI its officially supposed to be Under Boob.
gloopy is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 10:31 AM
  #44  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
Maybe it is in Atlanta, but to the English speaking world it's AIRLINES!

air·line
ˈe(ə)rˌlīn/
noun
plural noun: airlines
1.
an organization providing a regular public service of air transportation on one or more routes.
Regular service, eh? Hmmmm Are you sure the service Southwest AIRLINES provides qualifies as "regular"?



KEY ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AND FLIGHT CANCELLATION STATISTICS
Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics by the 14 Reporting Carriers and Tarmac Data Filed by All Carriers
Overall
76.9 percent on-time arrivals
Highest On-Time Arrival Rates
  1. Hawaiian Airlines – 93.2 percent
  2. Alaska Airlines – 89.7 percent
  3. Delta Air Lines – 84.4 percent
Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates
  1. ExpressJet Airlines – 70.3 percent
  2. Envoy Air – 71.4 percent
  3. Southwest Airlines – 71.8 percent


You know I'm just yanking your chain dontcha?
tsquare is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 10:42 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Talking

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
lolwut?

so because "airlines" is a word, that trumps "air" and "lines" being used separately?

Oh and FYI its officially supposed to be Under Boob.
Of course it doesn't mean they can't be used separately. For instance--Air is flowing through the pneumatic lines.-- is perfectly acceptable.

When used separately it simply no longer means "a system furnishing air transport between specified points."

Don't sweat it, some companies have been butchering the English language for years and doing just fine.
shoelu is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 01:46 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
Who ever said DL couldn't fly an RNP? Please provide a link. Only thing we said was to get your own. I'm craving to be validated by a true MAJOR airline pilot since the non-bankrupt, 75 year + legacy I work for is only a regional, I have a huge hole in my sole to fly big airplanes into malaria infested lands....duh
You have a hole in your shoe? Or your soul?

Carry on.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:14 PM
  #47  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
Of course it doesn't mean they can't be used separately. For instance--Air is flowing through the pneumatic lines.-- is perfectly acceptable.

When used separately it simply no longer means "a system furnishing air transport between specified points."

Don't sweat it, some companies have been butchering the English language for years and doing just fine.

Kind of like luv? Amirite?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:17 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,728
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
Don't sweat it, some companies have been butchering the English language for years and doing just fine.
Speaking of butchering, I see SWA has found a new source of ancillary revenue on Tuesday nights:



biigD is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:18 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
Who ever said DL couldn't fly an RNP? Please provide a link. Only thing we said was to get your own. I'm craving to be validated by a true MAJOR airline pilot since the non-bankrupt, 75 year + legacy I work for is only a regional, I have a huge hole in my sole to fly big airplanes into malaria infested lands....duh
There are not many constants in the airline industry. One however has always been when a airline starts a new market airlines already in that market do everything to aide in providing a safe operation. They normally share everything they can from a operational basis to assist the startup. That includes carrying the check airman from the new airline into the new airport on jumpseats and sharing every detail you on best practices. Alaska is the first airline I have ever seen refuse that courtesy ever. It's sad for the entire industry.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-27-2014, 04:43 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There are not many constants in the airline industry. One however has always been when a airline starts a new market airlines already in that market do everything to aide in providing a safe operation. They normally share everything they can from a operational basis to assist the startup. That includes carrying the check airman from the new airline into the new airport on jumpseats and sharing every detail you on best practices. Alaska is the first airline I have ever seen refuse that courtesy ever. It's sad for the entire industry.
Spot on Sailing. Alaska screwed the pooch and it's coming home to roost. Juno is simply a symptom. Guys like Pelican are perfect examples. The fact that another airline would decide to fly a similar route blows their minds.
buzzpat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jparker371
Compass Airlines
9413
03-01-2016 08:57 AM
CRJAV8OR
Major
0
03-08-2012 09:07 AM
ehe2
Regional
34
06-25-2009 06:17 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-31-2005 09:35 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices