Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ALPA opposes third-class medical reform >

ALPA opposes third-class medical reform

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ALPA opposes third-class medical reform

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2015, 06:25 AM
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by 727C47 View Post
The same can be said for you too amigo, in spades, they went to 65 against the wishes of the majority of the membership, I can go on and on, but I won't , and I'm talking about present day 21st century ALPA , not the pioneering Union that did much good work.
Again, ALPA had zero (ZERO!) say in Age 65. It was strictly a Congressional mandate driven by ICAO. All ALPA could do was minimize the damage to pensions/retirement issues.

Anyone who doesn't/can't remember how the whole thing went down is either ignorant or obtuse.

So which one are you?
Packrat is offline  
Old 07-28-2015, 06:41 AM
  #82  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Here's what I remember how the whole thing went down:





ALPA combined "drop opposition" and "modify policy" to say a majority of members supported the retirement age change.

Also, how exactly did ALPA "Minimize the damage"?
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 07-28-2015, 06:43 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Again, ALPA had zero (ZERO!) say in Age 65. It was strictly a Congressional mandate driven by ICAO. All ALPA could do was minimize the damage to pensions/retirement issues.

Anyone who doesn't/can't remember how the whole thing went down is either ignorant or obtuse.

So which one are you?
Neither, the anger of the many was the result of the perception of the rolling over by the few ( National) instead of fighting the good fight that the rank and file wished to be waged. Keep the insults coming though they are really helping your argument, and yes, I'm just as guilty and I will try to keep to the facts.
727C47 is offline  
Old 07-28-2015, 11:34 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Seggy View Post
So you are OK with Congress dictating to the FAA medical standards?
That wasn't ALPA's argument................

" If not for how this legislation impacts the safety of the airspace in which our members fly, ALPA would not weigh in on this matter."

"This legislation has the potential to allow medically unfit pilots unfettered access to the national airspace at altitudes up to 18,000 feet with aircraft large enough to accommodate 6 occupants, at speeds up to 250 knots, in airspace which includes commercial airline traffic carrying passengers and cargo."
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 07-28-2015, 07:25 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
Default

Just because they didn't mention it means it is an invalid argument.
Seggy is offline  
Old 07-29-2015, 06:13 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 984
Default

I think there is a lot of unnecessary fear here... This is *third* class medical, relatively easy to obtain, and relatively easy to get special, as long as it is something that you honestly should not be flying.

The alternative is basically no medical examination whatsoever ("reform" buzzword should be "repeal.")

If it had no potential implication for first class medical, would you as a professional support it? I do believe that medically unfit pilots would make the airspace less safe. Most would be single pilot crashes.

Most elderly people stop driving after a very minor crash or incident. I see this all the time as a doc, usually a scrape against a mailbox or lamppost and then kids or grandkids make them turn in the keys. Who examines for license renewals in most states? Nobody. You can keep driving until something happens.

I really don't see the impetus for the third class repeal other than the self interest of aging AOPA group, of which I am a member, but do not really agree with a significant amount of their positions.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-29-2015, 06:24 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd View Post
I think there is a lot of unnecessary fear here... This is *third* class medical, relatively easy to obtain, and relatively easy to get special, as long as it is something that you honestly should not be flying.

The alternative is basically no medical examination whatsoever ("reform" buzzword should be "repeal.")

If it had no potential implication for first class medical, would you as a professional support it? I do believe that medically unfit pilots would make the airspace less safe. Most would be single pilot crashes.

Most elderly people stop driving after a very minor crash or incident. I see this all the time as a doc, usually a scrape against a mailbox or lamppost and then kids or grandkids make them turn in the keys. Who examines for license renewals in most states? Nobody. You can keep driving until something happens.

I really don't see the impetus for the third class repeal other than the self interest of aging AOPA group, of which I am a member, but do not really agree with a significant amount of their positions.
Well and cogently stated Doc. We may have some differences of opinion but you make a good argument .
727C47 is offline  
Old 07-30-2015, 11:51 AM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

AOPA is conducting a three question survey of ALPA pilots.

http://aopa.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/fo...g0sHMWp4F?MS=M
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-30-2015, 12:24 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 715
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
AOPA is conducting a three question survey of ALPA pilots.

http://aopa.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/fo...g0sHMWp4F?MS=M
My Union speaks for me. No need to respond to that.
ManFlex is offline  
Old 07-30-2015, 02:38 PM
  #90  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by ManFlex View Post
My Union speaks for me. No need to respond to that.

And sometimes our union speaks the wrong words.
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marc1968
Pilot Health
11
05-10-2018 07:35 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
Nextlife
Military
2
08-30-2014 07:29 PM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-18-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices