Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Question on Rain Take-off >

Question on Rain Take-off

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Question on Rain Take-off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2014, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Default Question on Rain Take-off

Hey guys quick question.

I noticed that in a 172 POH the following is listed.

"The use of full carburetor heat is recommended during flight in heavy rain to avod the possibility of engine stoppage due to excessive water ingestion or caqrburetor ice."

I am just wondering if this applies to take-off. Reason I ask is because I feel like during take-off since you will be pitch-up your intake under the cowling is pretty much exposed right to the rain.

Knowing this, would you be using carb heat on take-off in a rainy day (given standard OAT), or taking off with carb heat off, and then turning it on once cruise speed is attained?

The only accidents I've read of in this situation (which aren't many, just ones I've seen on forums), were engine cutting out during take-off in the rain, which is why I'm wondering if it is better to use it on take-off. Perhaps it would depend on loading and the airplane? Perhaps it is best to use it on first take-off but maybe not after a touch and go when the engine is warmed up more?

Thanks guys! And P.S. I don't mean during a hurricane downpour or something, I mean just a drizzly/rainy day when you want to practice in the pattern for an hour or so (Friday forecasts a bit of rain and if the vis/ceiling is sufficient I'd like to practice a bit then).
evamodel00 is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 01:14 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Default

I think the operative word here is heavy. If you are in VFR conditions, you are definitely not in heavy rain.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 02:34 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by evamodel00 View Post
Hey guys quick question.

I noticed that in a 172 POH the following is listed.

"The use of full carburetor heat is recommended during flight in heavy rain to avod the possibility of engine stoppage due to excessive water ingestion or caqrburetor ice."

I am just wondering if this applies to take-off. Reason I ask is because I feel like during take-off since you will be pitch-up your intake under the cowling is pretty much exposed right to the rain.

Knowing this, would you be using carb heat on take-off in a rainy day (given standard OAT), or taking off with carb heat off, and then turning it on once cruise speed is attained?

The only accidents I've read of in this situation (which aren't many, just ones I've seen on forums), were engine cutting out during take-off in the rain, which is why I'm wondering if it is better to use it on take-off. Perhaps it would depend on loading and the airplane? Perhaps it is best to use it on first take-off but maybe not after a touch and go when the engine is warmed up more?

Thanks guys! And P.S. I don't mean during a hurricane downpour or something, I mean just a drizzly/rainy day when you want to practice in the pattern for an hour or so (Friday forecasts a bit of rain and if the vis/ceiling is sufficient I'd like to practice a bit then).
Carb icing doesn't really have anything to do with engine temp. It's in the carb, not the engine. An engine running for 8 hours is just as susceptible to carb ice as one running for 8 minutes.

and regarding your "pitch up" it's basically your angle of attack, you're not just pitched up at 10 degrees or whatever plowing straight and level
exposing your intake to a full on blast, if that makes sense. Not that it would probably matter anyways.
mooney is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 05:27 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 669
Default

I would never use carb heat during takeoff because it will slightly decrease performance, if the weather is that bad, one doesn't need to be operating a 172 in it. A normal everyday rain, is not going to do anything to the engine in terms of "drowning" it.
Brokeasspot is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 07:07 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by Brokeasspot View Post
I would never use carb heat during takeoff
Wait till you try to keep an engine running in Alaska when it's cold.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 04-23-2014, 04:09 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Brokeasspot View Post
A normal everyday rain, is not going to do anything to the engine in terms of "drowning" it.
Thanks! that's what I was looking to get answered.
evamodel00 is offline  
Old 04-23-2014, 09:38 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by mooney View Post
Carb icing doesn't really have anything to do with engine temp. It's in the carb, not the engine. An engine running for 8 hours is just as susceptible to carb ice as one running for 8 minutes.

and regarding your "pitch up" it's basically your angle of attack, you're not just pitched up at 10 degrees or whatever plowing straight and level
exposing your intake to a full on blast, if that makes sense. Not that it would probably matter anyways.
Mooney,

Thanks for the input. Just to clarify what I meant, I wasn't trying to say if the engine is warm carb ice is less of a threat. I was wondering if carb heat on initial take-off wouldn't impair t/o performance as much as later on when it's warmed.

The reason I was asking was because there was a post on this forum a few years back of a guy whos friend's engine cut-out while on t/o in heavy rain (c-172) and had to land straight ahead. He said there was no warning, and since it was a forum post, there weren't many details. But that's why i was wondering if it's possible to drown the engine.
evamodel00 is offline  
Old 04-27-2014, 12:50 PM
  #8  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

My roommate flew into heavy rain shortly after takeoff in a 152 (same forward facing intake). The engine quit and he almost made it back to the field.

IMHO, if the rain is heavy enough to consider taking off with carb heat on, it is probably best to take a delay. At the very least have a long enough runway that the reduced power is not a concern.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 04-27-2014, 07:50 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 834
Default

It is more to do with excessive water ingestion or water blockage than carb ice, although the potential can exist for either. The biggest reason for the carb heat in heavy rain (or experiencing impact icing...) is that it provides an alternate air source, that will allow an adequate supply of induction air to the engine. It will be unfiltered and will also reduce maximum power available due to the air being heated as it passes through the heat muff on the exhaust tube, but at least your engine will continue to run. You just need to plan for a reduced power T/O (And lean accordingly) Most fuel injected models have "alternate air" in case of intake blockage. As has been said, you probably/knowingly don't want to launch into heavy rain conditions in a 172 anyway... Additionally, If you have never encountered carb ice, it is nothing to play around with. Many times a pilot won't notice the RPM reduction right away (with a fixed pitched prop) and will let the situation degrade to the point of the engine shaking. At that point you will have precious seconds remaining until the engine quits. Always use FULL carb heat.

Last edited by Yoda2; 04-27-2014 at 08:03 PM.
Yoda2 is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 06:38 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Yoda2 View Post
It is more to do with excessive water ingestion or water blockage than carb ice, although the potential can exist for either. The biggest reason for the carb heat in heavy rain (or experiencing impact icing...) is that it provides an alternate air source, that will allow an adequate supply of induction air to the engine. It will be unfiltered and will also reduce maximum power available due to the air being heated as it passes through the heat muff on the exhaust tube, but at least your engine will continue to run. You just need to plan for a reduced power T/O (And lean accordingly) Most fuel injected models have "alternate air" in case of intake blockage. As has been said, you probably/knowingly don't want to launch into heavy rain conditions in a 172 anyway... Additionally, If you have never encountered carb ice, it is nothing to play around with. Many times a pilot won't notice the RPM reduction right away (with a fixed pitched prop) and will let the situation degrade to the point of the engine shaking. At that point you will have precious seconds remaining until the engine quits. Always use FULL carb heat.

Thanks for the explanation. I've experienced carb ice only once really (well maybe more, but only once where the engine ran run for a few seconds once I pulled the heat). Every small plane I've flown so far my throttle plays RPM games with me no matter how tight the throttle lock so it's always a toss up at which it is. I generally would pull the heat every time.
evamodel00 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices