Search

Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013 | 06:46 AM
  #251  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
Not trying to be a DB... Sorry if it came off that way. I failed my private many years ago.

It's just that after the Colgan accident where the captain had a history of training failures I'm surprised airlines still hire folks with more than one or at most two busts. It's a potential legal liability I would assume. But I'm not in the hiring dept or the training dept so nobody asked me..... Sorry if it came across as dumb.

As to the recent weak guy I flew with? It was an anomaly. 99% of the new folks I fly with are super solid. This one was an exception.
I'm pretty sure the Colgan captain had 121 failures - big difference from busting a private or CFI ride, or anything in between. Now.. if someone shows up with 2-3 121 busts, then I'd say that person is lucky to have gotten an interview in the first place.
Reply
Old 08-26-2013 | 08:52 AM
  #252  
BTpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by friendlyskies
I'm pretty sure the Colgan captain had 121 failures - big difference from busting a private or CFI ride, or anything in between. Now.. if someone shows up with 2-3 121 busts, then I'd say that person is lucky to have gotten an interview in the first place.
Bingo. At whiskey we are firing FOs who bust.. And yes there are a number of them.
Reply
Old 08-26-2013 | 10:49 AM
  #253  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by BTpilot
Bingo. At whiskey we are firing FOs who bust.. And yes there are a number of them.
Looking at the crew availability section on CSS...there are frequently a shockingly high number. Are they sacking people who don't complete the mv portion or only if they actually bust the loe portion? Is this standard practice because it seems fairly costly to fire and then replace/train?
Reply
Old 08-26-2013 | 11:27 AM
  #254  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Looking at the crew availability section on CSS...there are frequently a shockingly high number. Are they sacking people who don't complete the mv portion or only if they actually bust the loe portion? Is this standard practice because it seems fairly costly to fire and then replace/train?
I'm pretty sure he is referring to new hire FO's who fail being shown the door. They don't do MV and LOE initially. It's just a standard PC for them the first time through training. If a long time FO fails a LOE, it's not as easy to simply fire them for it. There has to be retraining and testing done.
Reply
Old 08-26-2013 | 11:38 AM
  #255  
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I'm pretty sure he is referring to new hire FO's who fail being shown the door. They don't do MV and LOE initially. It's just a standard PC for them the first time through training. If a long time FO fails a LOE, it's not as easy to simply fire them for it. There has to be retraining and testing done.
Oh I was under the impression it was the probie ride/ATP/type ride people were leaving on. There were a couple guys in my new hire class a while back who got a second chance.
Reply
Old 08-26-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #256  
BTpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Oh I was under the impression it was the probie ride/ATP/type ride people were leaving on. There were a couple guys in my new hire class a while back who got a second chance.
Yeah blue skies said it right.. Talking about guys who are brand new simply not making it through training.. and yes he's right that there isnt AQP for new dudes
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 02:44 AM
  #257  
doin time
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: RJ Left
Default

Originally Posted by BTpilot
Yeah blue skies said it right.. Talking about guys who are brand new simply not making it through training.. and yes he's right that there isnt AQP for new dudes
What about the chicks?
Reply
Old 08-27-2013 | 06:44 AM
  #258  
el jefe's Avatar
Tier 3 Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Canadair Gosh
Default

Total sausage fest here at AWAC.
Reply
Old 08-29-2013 | 06:54 PM
  #259  
LBCliving30's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Interview next week, any input?
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 05:03 AM
  #260  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by LBCliving30
Interview next week, any input?
Back when I interviewed it was a 3-hour written test with a short essay on mach tuck and the theory of aerodynamics that cause dutch roll.

Then it was off to the sim, where we flew some V1 cuts in the SR-71 sim they have and a few approaches and missed approaches (single engine, of course) to a (simulated) carrier landing, at night, with rough seas.

After that, if you passed, they sent you off to survival training in the desert. Like NASA used to do.

Simple stuff really.

I don't know what they do anymore. But I've heard from a knowledgeable source that there is a written test with ATP questions and a simulator check that tests IFR skills.

And don't tell them that you want the job so bad that you'll work for free. They had one recently who did that. Not sure he made it to the survival training part....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 04:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices