Air Wisconsin
08-26-2013, 06:46 AM
#251
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 90
Originally Posted by saab2000
Not trying to be a DB... Sorry if it came off that way. I failed my private many years ago.
It's just that after the Colgan accident where the captain had a history of training failures I'm surprised airlines still hire folks with more than one or at most two busts. It's a potential legal liability I would assume. But I'm not in the hiring dept or the training dept so nobody asked me..... Sorry if it came across as dumb.
As to the recent weak guy I flew with? It was an anomaly. 99% of the new folks I fly with are super solid. This one was an exception.
It's just that after the Colgan accident where the captain had a history of training failures I'm surprised airlines still hire folks with more than one or at most two busts. It's a potential legal liability I would assume. But I'm not in the hiring dept or the training dept so nobody asked me..... Sorry if it came across as dumb.
As to the recent weak guy I flew with? It was an anomaly. 99% of the new folks I fly with are super solid. This one was an exception.
08-26-2013, 08:52 AM
#252
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: 777
Posts: 495
Originally Posted by friendlyskies
I'm pretty sure the Colgan captain had 121 failures - big difference from busting a private or CFI ride, or anything in between. Now.. if someone shows up with 2-3 121 busts, then I'd say that person is lucky to have gotten an interview in the first place.
08-26-2013, 10:49 AM
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by BTpilot
Bingo. At whiskey we are firing FOs who bust.. And yes there are a number of them.
08-26-2013, 11:27 AM
#254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: On the road
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Looking at the crew availability section on CSS...there are frequently a shockingly high number. Are they sacking people who don't complete the mv portion or only if they actually bust the loe portion? Is this standard practice because it seems fairly costly to fire and then replace/train?
08-26-2013, 11:38 AM
#255
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by BlueSkiesAhead
I'm pretty sure he is referring to new hire FO's who fail being shown the door. They don't do MV and LOE initially. It's just a standard PC for them the first time through training. If a long time FO fails a LOE, it's not as easy to simply fire them for it. There has to be retraining and testing done.
08-26-2013, 01:19 PM
#256
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: 777
Posts: 495
Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Oh I was under the impression it was the probie ride/ATP/type ride people were leaving on. There were a couple guys in my new hire class a while back who got a second chance.
08-27-2013, 02:44 AM
#257
doin time
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 436
Originally Posted by BTpilot
Yeah blue skies said it right.. Talking about guys who are brand new simply not making it through training.. and yes he's right that there isnt AQP for new dudes
08-30-2013, 05:03 AM
#260
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Originally Posted by LBCliving30
Interview next week, any input?
Then it was off to the sim, where we flew some V1 cuts in the SR-71 sim they have and a few approaches and missed approaches (single engine, of course) to a (simulated) carrier landing, at night, with rough seas.
After that, if you passed, they sent you off to survival training in the desert. Like NASA used to do.
Simple stuff really.
I don't know what they do anymore. But I've heard from a knowledgeable source that there is a written test with ATP questions and a simulator check that tests IFR skills.
And don't tell them that you want the job so bad that you'll work for free. They had one recently who did that. Not sure he made it to the survival training part....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
