![]() |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2586809)
I don’t wish you or any of your brethren ill will. Here’s the reasons why SWA is going to Hawaii as stated numerous times by the company:
1. To give our Rapid Rewards pax the ability to use their points on a Hawaiian vacation (as is available on DLA, AA, UAL, etc.). 2. To support the “California Strong” initiative 3. The point that most everyone is missing is that we are carrying a lot of pax to California where they then connect to HAL (& Alaska) and fly to the islands. Therefore we are basically feeding the competition as they take our pax to the islands instead of us doing that for them. 4. Inter-island fares are high and SWA realizes they can go in and make a legitimate play for some of that market. I sincerely hope there’s enough pax and revenue to go around for all of us but because of a combination of points 3 & 4 I just don’t see this as being a good thing for HAL airlines. Kind of like the Spirit build up in BWI is not good for SWA. Nature of the industry though. Is your ETOP’d program on track? We are y’all going to be ETOP’d? |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2586809)
I don’t wish you or any of your brethren ill will. Here’s the reasons why SWA is going to Hawaii as stated numerous times by the company:
1. To give our Rapid Rewards pax the ability to use their points on a Hawaiian vacation (as is available on DLA, AA, UAL, etc.). 2. To support the “California Strong” initiative 3. The point that most everyone is missing is that we are carrying a lot of pax to California where they then connect to HAL (& Alaska) and fly to the islands. Therefore we are basically feeding the competition as they take our pax to the islands instead of us doing that for them. 4. Inter-island fares are high and SWA realizes they can go in and make a legitimate play for some of that market. I sincerely hope there’s enough pax and revenue to go around for all of us but because of a combination of points 3 & 4 I just don’t see this as being a good thing for HAL airlines. Kind of like the Spirit build up in BWI is not good for SWA. Nature of the industry though. |
Originally Posted by Pogey Bait
(Post 2586832)
Is your ETOP’d program on track? We are y’all going to be ETOP’d?
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2586861)
On track? Supposedly, but you know how that goes. I don’t understand the second ? though.
|
SJC, SMF, OAK, & SAN to LIH, HNL, OGG & KOA.
|
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2586870)
SJC, SMF, OAK, & SAN to LIH, HNL, OGG & KOA.
|
Originally Posted by KnockKnock
(Post 2586474)
OCCP, I think investments in buildings means they plan on growth otherwise why do it?
-MT |
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop
(Post 2587186)
"Everybody has plan until they get punched in the mouth..."
-MT |
New buildings mean absolutely nothing. Real estate is an asset and the space will be attractive to a suitor wanting to grow in pnw. It won’t cost Delta or American much to rip the alaska signage down and toss it in the garbage where is belongs.
|
Originally Posted by opdeliber
(Post 2587257)
New buildings mean absolutely nothing. Real estate is an asset and the space will be attractive to a suitor wanting to grow in pnw. It won’t cost Delta or American much to rip the alaska signage down and toss it in the garbage where is belongs.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands