![]() |
Originally Posted by OCCP
(Post 2587568)
All AS did was buy itself 5-10 years because it doesn’t know how to evolve
|
Originally Posted by KnockKnock
(Post 2587605)
When you say AS only bought 5-10 more years, being that VX was the item purchased, you’re acknowledging that VX had no future on it’s own and will only cause the eventual downfall of AS.
|
Originally Posted by WutFace
(Post 2587796)
VX had its own thriving niche market, which AS management promptly abandoned. You don't get to lay this at the feet of Virgin. I'm with OCCP on this one: on its current trajectory, Alaska Airlines has less than 5 years before a major shift/failure happens.
|
I didn’t realize we had so many airline pilots who are CEOs, CFOs, COOs and other upper management bubbas. Had I known a college degree wasn’t a requirement for these positions, heck I wouldn’t have wasted four years of my life or maybe should have gotten an “online-pay-4-diploma” BA in Under Water Fire Prevention (UWFP) like some of y’all.
|
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2587819)
I didn’t realize we had so many airline pilots who are CEOs, CFOs, COOs and other upper management bubbas. Had I known a college degree wasn’t a requirement for these positions, heck I wouldn’t have wasted four years of my life or maybe should have gotten an “online-pay-4-diploma” BA in Under Water Fire Prevention (UWFP) like some of y’all.
|
Originally Posted by GUFN
(Post 2587834)
Don't be naive. There are plenty of pilots with MBAs or related management/finance degrees. And, guess what, they all have real world experience in the aviation industry.
|
Originally Posted by GUFN
(Post 2587834)
Don't be naive. There are plenty of pilots with MBAs or related management/finance degrees. And, guess what, they all have real world experience in the aviation industry.
|
In reply to your point, William Walsh runs AIG (parent company of BA, Iberia, among others), one of the biggest airline holding companies in the world. Mr. Walsh is a former airline pilot, having started his flying career with Irish flag carrier Aer Lingus, subsequently running the company, and then moving on to run BA, followed by AIG.
|
And don't forget...Donald Trump's personal pilot will be the FAA Administrator.
|
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2587850)
I’m not I’m not aware of any professional cockpit monkeys running a successful airline at the moment, capisce?
|
All of this talk about the demise of Alaska Airlines is absolutely nuts. One of the things we do have are probably one of the best airline management teams in the country. Pilots being as brilliant as we are often are so ego-centric that many actually believe that how they are doing is a direct indication of how well the airline itself is doing. Brad and Bens’ job is to get us to fly as much as possible for as little as possible while keeping attrition to an acceptable level without any service disruptions due to labor strife. The fact that they are getting the same, probably better productivity out of their pilots for less pay than the bigger 4 is a testament to their management skills, not an indication of Alaska’s iminent demise. Alaska Airlines future is bright and full of profits. This management team will figure it out. What is not a forgone conclusion is whether this airline will be a coast to coast airline, an airline in name only with CPAs for RJ’s, or perhaps an airplane leasing company dry-leasing 737’s to chinese airlines.
The Alaska Airlines shareholder has a very bright and promising future...Alaska pilots...who knows? |
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2588636)
All of this talk about the demise of Alaska Airlines is absolutely nuts. One of the things we do have are probably one of the best airline management teams in the country. Pilots being as brilliant as we are often are so ego-centric that many actually believe that how they are doing is a direct indication of how well the airline itself is doing. Brad and Bens’ job is to get us to fly as much as possible for as little as possible while keeping attrition to an acceptable level without any service disruptions due to labor strife. The fact that they are getting the same, probably better productivity out of their pilots for less pay than the bigger 4 is a testament to their management skills, not an indication of Alaska’s iminent demise. Alaska Airlines future is bright and full of profits. This management team will figure it out. What is not a forgone conclusion is whether this airline will be a coast to coast airline, an airline in name only with CPAs for RJ’s, or perhaps an airplane leasing company dry-leasing 737’s to chinese airlines.
The Alaska Airlines shareholder has a very bright and promising future...Alaska pilots...who knows? |
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2588636)
The Alaska Airlines shareholder has a very bright and promising future...Alaska pilots...who knows? Lets hope so, because they have lost 40% since last March. |
Originally Posted by waterboy
(Post 2595290)
Lets hope so, because they have lost 40% since last March.
|
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2588636)
One of the things we do have are probably one of the best airline management teams in the country.
|
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2595437)
These are the same guys that got bid up and paid $4.5B in cash and debt for VX. I don’t know if “the best” is the term I’d use.
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 2595687)
They didn't have a choice. If they didn't spend 57/share on VX, jetBlue was going to get it at 55/share. Had jetBlue bought VX, Alaska would have been screwed. AS did what it had to do.
|
Well done JetBlue! After 15 years in business, and with your first contract, you were able to get more than Alaska has in 85 years! 🤦*♂️
|
Well done JetBlue. First contract. Scope, pay, health care, scheduling etc etc all the things no one can get in their first contract.
Amazing. |
I believe , the proposed pay rate 12 year Cpt is the same here at Alaska and 15% 401k also the same .
|
86 years and 18 years. Seems like they achieved a lot more in a lot less time.
And scope. |
Commuter
First day of short call reserve no RAP or pairing report prior to 1000 (waivable by pilot)
o First day of long call reserve no pairing report prior to 1400 We need this at alaska!!! |
• Industry-leading pairing construction rules
• Max unstacking restrictions • Ability to utilize trade-board to reduce line to ZERO hours |
Originally Posted by Flaps1check
(Post 2596784)
• Industry-leading pairing construction rules
• Max unstacking restrictions • Ability to utilize trade-board to reduce line to ZERO hours •Useful 1 month a year, benefits only senior guys. •All the junior guys will be stuck with their crappy lines as all the senior guys dump their garbage and turn the reserve grid red. Do not be jealous. We still dont know what kind of scope we got. If it was that great I think they would have highlighted all the great things about it. We will still be whoring out to the ME3 and every other foreign dirtbag outfit. You guys, get a snap up. Please. Then we can get one (next go round probably) and we can finally pattern bargain. |
Originally Posted by Flaps1check
(Post 2596784)
• Industry-leading pairing construction rules
• Max unstacking restrictions • Ability to utilize trade-board to reduce line to ZERO hours Trade to zero - Alaska has this also. Maybe you meant drop to zero maybe? If this is NOT dependent on some coverage formula/staffing chart then it is a benefit. If not, than it will turn out to be not very useful. Right now I can technically drop to 75 but none of my trips are droppable. I think it would help the senior guys get not only weekends but weekdays off too. It won’t help the guys on the bottom of the list at all. |
They didn’t have a guy named Kasher destroy decades of pay work rules advancements in one destructive ruling. You don’t get much when you’re begging hat in hand after a guy like Kasher destroys your world. It takes time to get it back....if ever.
Originally Posted by cmrflyer
(Post 2596676)
86 years and 18 years. Seems like they achieved a lot more in a lot less time.
And scope. |
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2596885)
Max unshackling- Alaska already has that...it is called no unstacking.
Trade to zero - Alaska has this also. Maybe you meant drop to zero maybe? If this is NOT dependent on some coverage formula/staffing chart then it is a benefit. If not, than it will turn out to be not very useful. Right now I can technically drop to 75 but none of my trips are droppable. I think it would help the senior guys get not only weekends but weekdays off too. It won’t help the guys on the bottom of the list at all. |
I would ignore passer for now. We only have bullet points right now. The devil is in the details so hopefully we make sure all the small print is spot on. A lot of guys are making assumptions but really know nothing especially POG above
|
Originally Posted by blueballs
(Post 2597184)
I would ignore passer for now. We only have bullet points right now. The devil is in the details so hopefully we make sure all the small print is spot on. A lot of guys are making assumptions but really know nothing especially POG above
|
Originally Posted by cmrflyer
(Post 2596676)
86 years and 18 years. Seems like they achieved a lot more in a lot less time.
And scope. This says so much about Alaska |
We're gonna have to change all the stickers to "6th Best"
|
Originally Posted by Slim6890
(Post 2596749)
First day of short call reserve no RAP or pairing report prior to 1000 (waivable by pilot)
o First day of long call reserve no pairing report prior to 1400 We need this at alaska!!!
Originally Posted by Moose
(Post 2597150)
They didn’t have a guy named Kasher destroy decades of pay work rules advancements in one destructive ruling. You don’t get much when you’re begging hat in hand after a guy like Kasher destroys your world. It takes time to get it back....if ever.
'09? '13? '17? Be honest, '13 was all about hitting the 200 number at the expense of pretty much everything else. And who voted the pension plan away? Wasn't that a self-inflicted voting in? |
Originally Posted by blueballs
(Post 2597184)
I would ignore passer for now. We only have bullet points right now. The devil is in the details so hopefully we make sure all the small print is spot on. A lot of guys are making assumptions but really know nothing especially POG above
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 2597346)
Why? When the majority drive to work, this goes to the bottom of the priority list.
That was 2005. '09? '13? '17? Be honest, '13 was all about hitting the 200 number at the expense of pretty much everything else. And who voted the pension plan away? Wasn't that a self-inflicted voting in? |
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2597851)
You missed the main point. AS voted the pension plan away for the NEW GUYS. If you look at Alaska’s contract from a senior pilots point of view it is rock solid. 41 days of vacation. Who cares about scope anyway. Industry leading retirement. Step trading actually works. It’s a whole nother contract.
|
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
(Post 2597851)
You missed the main point. AS voted the pension plan away for the NEW GUYS.
Everyone on the property at the time was given a choice...A plan, freeze plus increase in 401k contributions or straight 401k with even larger contributions. Those were the choices. Straight 401k for new hires after a determined date. Yet you seem to think the people on the property made a NEGOTIATED for a clause to screw potential employees. Back in the days of the B-scale, I'd agree with you. On this topic you're WAY off base. |
Why the hell would you even WANT a DB plan? Any CEO can shed that at his leisure with a quick trip through the BK drive-thru. Unless you think the PBGC is going to pay out more than a 401K...
|
The rules have changed as American found out when they tried to shed the pension to the PBGC.
http://time.com/5167301/airlines-pilots-pensions/
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2598303)
Why the hell would you even WANT a DB plan? Any CEO can shed that at his leisure with a quick trip through the BK drive-thru. Unless you think the PBGC is going to pay out more than a 401K...
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2598303)
Why the hell would you even WANT a DB plan? Any CEO can shed that at his leisure with a quick trip through the BK drive-thru. Unless you think the PBGC is going to pay out more than a 401K...
I don't care who sends the check every month as long as its the same every month. Now the guys who got raped were the DAL/UAL heavy guys who had an A plan that paid $8/$9K a month and got rolled into the PBGC at $4K a month. If I'm a young guy given a choice, I'd forgo the A plan and opt for a 13-15% 401k match every time. |
Originally Posted by Moose
(Post 2598321)
The rules have changed as American found out when they tried to shed the pension to the PBGC.
Profiting Airlines at Odds with Pilots Over Pensions | Time |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands