Search

Notices

Seniority Proposals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2018 | 06:01 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: a cushy one with a forward facing window
Default

Originally Posted by NotTellin
^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^

Here’s the deal. None of of us asked for this. None of us has any control over this. An arbitrator will determine SLI. Not you or me. So how about we all just chill out, have a beer and wait for the results. When they come out, this will be your new reality. AS pilots didn’t do this to you. VX Pilots didn’t do this to you. ALA5KA MANAGEMENT DID THIS TO YOU! Take it out on them! WE MUST WORK TOGETHER FOR CONTRACT 2020! Otherwise we are doomed.
I hope we can share a cold on some day. This is by far the 100% truth. Ready to walk the line for 2020!
Reply
Old 04-10-2018 | 08:06 PM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

I want to know why VX gets a free 7 years of longevity (plus all these other gains) and AS doesn't

I want to know why AS ALPA never fights for ANYTHING, they just roll over as they always have (and they expect gains in 2020) The excuse of "the arbitrators will never take it seriously if we're more agressive" is crap. How did that work out in the last arbitration again? I'd rather have VX get an extra seven years shoved down my throat by an arbitrator that have the union I pay for advocate gains for the other side at my expense.

I say vote ALPA out since the MEC has no balls.
Reply
Old 04-10-2018 | 10:25 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ASpilot0936
I want to know why VX gets a free 7 years of longevity (plus all these other gains) and AS doesn't
I think thats cus you dont relaize VX had guys who were at Aloha, ATA, USAirways, Midwest, etc. Give them longevity for their time there then.
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 03:32 AM
  #44  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Alaska 70% longevity puts VX1 with a 2000-ish AS-DOH with a ratioing of the bottom few hundred guys.
VX 15% longevity by my estimation puts VX1 with 1989ish AS-DOH.

Both actually seem a little out to lunch. I have been an advocate of the 50% weighting in this merger because of how equal a case I think each side really has.

Alaska had safety and job security coupled with some retirements, but really no real growth beyond that. There has been an annualized 2% growth in the number of pilots at Alaska since I was hired here 12 years ago. Slow and steady wins the race? Hopefully.

Virgin America, no real guarantee of being able to make a career out of the place. You took a chance to be at a newer carrier with higher growth potential - congratulations, the gamble paid off.

A 50/50 weighting seems inherently fair giving each side equal credit for the choice they made. A 50/50 weighting would pair VX1 with a 1997ish AS-DOH.
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 05:20 AM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by KnockKnock
Do yourselves a favor and don’t even bother reading the proposals. I didn’t and I feel great! The only ones benefiting from this thread are the pharmaceutical companies that produce high blood pressure medication. We have no more input on this than we did on the JCBA. Both sides representatives did exactly as they should have for their respective groups. Place the anger where it’s deserved, AAG. Remember, they’re the ones laughing at us as we argue about who’s jet is more aerodynamic....
Curious.... how did AAG pilots have NO SAY on the JCBA? Wasn't it negotiated with VX pilots and the company?
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 06:11 AM
  #46  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Curious.... how did AAG pilots have NO SAY on the JCBA? Wasn't it negotiated with VX pilots and the company?
When they opened it up, they agreed to a definite timeline and arbitration if needed. At that point the company just dug in, probably knowing arbitration would lean in their favor.
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 06:49 AM
  #47  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Captain B-737
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Curious.... how did AAG pilots have NO SAY on the JCBA? Wasn't it negotiated with VX pilots and the company?
This company does not negotiate when they can tip the scale their way in arbitration. Arbitration is not a level playing field.
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 07:13 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Curious.... how did AAG pilots have NO SAY on the JCBA? Wasn't it negotiated with VX pilots and the company?
Yup, pretty much as rickair said, the “negotiation” was just a smokescreen. They never even came out with an actual proposal that we could see or build upon. It was all just done as working documents bound by NDA’s. They had faith that just like the Kasher arbitration, this one would favor their positions. They sat on their hands and bought themselves 6 extra months of cheap labor while literally laughing in our faces. (BM’s admission to sacrificing our relationship with management). I think his quote should printed out on a sticker in big bold letters next to a 2020 and placed on every rollaboard, flight case and on our next lanyard, to remind us of who the real enemy is!
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 07:48 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: Representing the REAL Delta
Default

Originally Posted by ASpilot0936

I say vote ALPA out since the MEC has no balls.
It’s not a function of ALPA. If you guys had a different union, the same guys would be in charge. It’s the group that you guys elected selling you out.

You need to recall reps, which isn’t pleasant but will breakup the good ol boys club. It also helps establish the expectation that they must serve the pilots and not themselves or the company.

I have no dog in this fight but the Anchorage reps are virtually selling the base out. If I were there, I would immediately initiate a recall.
Reply
Old 04-11-2018 | 08:07 AM
  #50  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,172
Likes: 233
Default It isn't that hard....

Let's see, 1960 Alaska pilots, 834 VX pilots. That's a ratio of about two point three-four to one.

So top three numbers go to the top three Alaska guys, then the senior VX guy, then the two next senior Alaska guys, then the next senior VX guy, then the next two senior Alaska guys, then the next senior VX guy, then the next three Alaska guys, then a VX guy, then two Alaska Guys, then a VX guy, then two Alaska guys, then a VX guy.

That's 14 Alaska guys and six VX guys. That's a ratio of about two point three four to one.

Now wash, rinse, and repeat with the rest of both pilot lists, until the entire new list is established. Just like shuffling cards...

No Alaska guy will lose seniority to any other Alaska guy and no VX guy will lose seniority to any other VX guy, and all but the the most junior VX guy will have at least a little more room between him/herself and any potential furloughs should the economy tank than they did before

What was so damn hard about that?

In a company with no serious scope limits, you'd think you guys would have better things to fight about then going at each other.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Anonymous
Cargo
7
03-18-2009 11:59 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices