Search
Notices

Seniority Proposals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2018, 09:22 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,899
Default

Originally Posted by ForeverJunior View Post
THIS!!

Direct all the venom at Angle Lake. Contract 2020 is way more important than us getting ****ed at each other. We need to put this behind us and focus on the contract.
True, but as a ticked off AirTran pilot once said, “contracts come and go, seniority is forever.”
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 10:32 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
True, but as a ticked off AirTran pilot once said, “contracts come and go, seniority is forever.”
Nothing is forever in this world.....except for diamonds, diamonds are forever.
KnockKnock is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 11:48 AM
  #53  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Let's see, 1960 Alaska pilots, 834 VX pilots. That's a ratio of about two point three-four to one.

So top three numbers go to the top three Alaska guys, then the senior VX guy, then the two next senior Alaska guys, then the next senior VX guy, then the next two senior Alaska guys, then the next senior VX guy, then the next three Alaska guys, then a VX guy, then two Alaska Guys, then a VX guy, then two Alaska guys, then a VX guy.

That's 14 Alaska guys and six VX guys. That's a ratio of about two point three four to one.

Now wash, rinse, and repeat with the rest of both pilot lists, until the entire new list is established. Just like shuffling cards...

No Alaska guy will lose seniority to any other Alaska guy and no VX guy will lose seniority to any other VX guy, and all but the the most junior VX guy will have at least a little more room between him/herself and any potential furloughs should the economy tank than they did before

What was so damn hard about that?

In a company with no serious scope limits, you'd think you guys would have better things to fight about then going at each other.
Sounds good. VX pilots will be filtered in from 2007 as the starting point.
tacoma1946 is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 12:07 PM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by tacoma1946 View Post
Sounds good. VX pilots will be filtered in from 2007 as the starting point.
I’ve got a friend who worked for an airline that stapled one pilot group below the other. That airline is no longer in business. The top group was willing to cut off its finger to protect their own turf and ended up killing the entire hand. We all need to work together or it will kill the entire group. Hopefully arrogance and misplaced anger doesn’t destroy the potential we have working together.
PokerPilot007 is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 12:32 PM
  #55  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

64/36 ratio and add back to filter in starting 01/01/1996. Remove the add-back constraint at 01/01/2002. Go straight ratio from there until 04/2016. Model the bottom 200 to place 41 former Virgin pilots as the plug. Build the list slots by stove piping. Place all non listers 1 number above the pilot directly below them pre-merger. Date of hire placement after 4/16. Protect all captains with ratio reduction language For 50 months.
 
Old 04-11-2018, 12:45 PM
  #56  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 10
Default

Vx started operations in 2007. That is where they should start being filtered in. The number 1 VX pilot should be right below the AS pilot that was hired when VX started. That is the starting point.
tacoma1946 is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 01:33 PM
  #57  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by tacoma1946 View Post
Vx started operations in 2007. That is where they should start being filtered in. The number 1 VX pilot should be right below the AS pilot that was hired when VX started. That is the starting point.
You are not fit to be in a union. You probably walked on the picket line and then slipped over for a little premium pay
 
Old 04-11-2018, 01:39 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit View Post
64/36 ratio and add back to filter in starting 01/01/1996. Remove the add-back constraint at 01/01/2002. Go straight ratio from there until 04/2016. Model the bottom 200 to place 41 former Virgin pilots as the plug. Build the list slots by stove piping. Place all non listers 1 number above the pilot directly below them pre-merger. Date of hire placement after 4/16. Protect all captains with ratio reduction language For 50 months.
Didn't Alaska not hire anyone from 2008 till 2012? Isn't this where the majority of VX pilots were hired?
atooraya is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 01:44 PM
  #59  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit View Post
You are not fit to be in a union. You probably walked on the picket line and then slipped over for a little premium pay
You must be VX. Why should a pilot that started in 2007 be matched with a guy that was hired 30 years ago? What you are saying is a 25 year old that was hired as a co pilot by VX in 2007 will be matched with a 60 year old that was hired 30 years ago. Really?
tacoma1946 is offline  
Old 04-11-2018, 01:45 PM
  #60  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Half of the Alaska pilots seniority list is 2006 or newer. Yes, we furloughed pilots starting in 2009. Last class was hired in 01/08 next class was 01/12
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
CurtissRobin
Cargo
7
03-18-2009 11:59 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices