![]() |
Originally Posted by Mudhen200
(Post 2633328)
Good grief...is that all you got? Classic example of what not to do. When you can’t even begin to defend your position when faced with facts and reality, you default to name calling. Although, I gotta admit, you choosing nepotism and management crony as your pet peeves is interesting.
I can assure you, I am neither. I’ve probably got more hours of volunteer time in ALPA than you have flight time. For the record, I’m not saying all is lost and that there is no hope for a better contract. I am simply saying that there will never be a strike at Alaska Airlines. We will have to use other means to achieve our goals, but a strike is off the table. The philosophy... the ACTUAL, LEGAL philosophy of our bargaining position needs to be clearly understoood and privately communicated by our union attorney, or reps, or whatever. We need to know what our ACTUAL weapons are if we have any. This has been incredibly enlightening. Not encouraging, but enlightening. We all know in any group you’re gonna have some sellouts (not pointing fingers it’s just true), but if half the pilot group thinks we have all the traditional legal tools for negotiation and the other half thinks we are just negotiating for managements charity, we’re screwed before we even start. Of course, if OZTeagle is correct, it’ll all be a moot point soon, but still... |
Seems like there are many people who feel another merger/acquisition/buyout is a given. I’m curious as to what it is that makes Alaska an attractive target to one of the major airlines. It seems like they could continue applying competitive pressure and just wait for Alaska to fail. As an Alaska employee I am definitely hoping for the best here but I guess I just don’t see what the big airlines gain that they don’t have already.
|
Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
(Post 2633489)
I just don’t see what the big airlines gain that they don’t have already.
Domination of KSEA, that's what they get. My money's on Delta buying/merging with us. |
Originally Posted by Mudhen200
(Post 2633328)
I can assure you, I am neither. I’ve probably got more hours of volunteer time in ALPA than you have flight time. I hope so, becasue that means you're senior. And as soon as you senior pukes who don't give a $hit about anybody below you retire, the rest of us who give a damn about our livelihood can get to the business of getting a better contract using the all tools available to us including a strike, which can happen if we grow enough balls & apply enough pressure. |
Originally Posted by ASpilot0936
(Post 2633504)
Domination of KSEA, that's what they get. My money's on Delta buying/merging with us.
|
Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
(Post 2633489)
Seems like there are many people who feel another merger/acquisition/buyout is a given. I’m curious as to what it is that makes Alaska an attractive target to one of the major airlines. It seems like they could continue applying competitive pressure and just wait for Alaska to fail. As an Alaska employee I am definitely hoping for the best here but I guess I just don’t see what the big airlines gain that they don’t have already.
|
Failure of what? SEA? Lol. Ask United and Southwest how that worked out for them. I get its in vogue to trash all things Alaska but it won’t happen. And as far as Delta in the state of Alaska, thats laughable as well. Takes them two hours to turn a plane in Fairbanks during the summer.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2633558)
A failure might not allow any given airline to pick up the specific pieces they may want... gates, jets, and maybe pilots these days. An accusation is a far more predictable way to achieve specific growth. And faster than organic growth, which depends on the availability of slots, gates, and planes. Also a failure is unlikely... far more likely that someone else would do the accusation and get the toys you wanted.
|
Originally Posted by ASpilot0936
(Post 2633504)
Domination of KSEA, that's what they get. My money's on Delta buying/merging with us.
|
Originally Posted by ASpilot0936
(Post 2633290)
And you can stick to SEA bub becasue you have no idea at the amount of freight we've given to NAC over the years when we only had 709 flying up here. And yet they seem to do just fine. They'll just bring one of their 767s up if they have to.
They'll all step up for the additional revenue as freight is gold up here..... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands