Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   Proudly All Boeing? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/122091-proudly-all-boeing.html)

NewGuy01 06-08-2019 04:00 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2833906)
No one would argue... but if you wanted huge growth, you went to the wrong airline. They will hold on to those options I am sure until that Max is flying.... free insurance. From everything I have seen, 6.5 to 7 year upgrade going forward. Steady but reasonable growth. Probably 3,700 pilots in 2025 if I had to bet my own money on it.



Personally I think 6.5 years is very optimistic for the SEA base. Maybe another anomaly will occur if a 737 SFO base opens, for example. Financially speaking I’m planning on 8-10 years for first available upgrade. With no improvements for the FO payscale or slope.

Hence the 1/2 milli I’ll have lost out on if UAL doesn’t call soon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thrill 06-08-2019 04:51 PM

UAL has been an active recruiter of AS pilots. Most popular destination for resignations this year.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OTZeagle1 06-08-2019 06:04 PM

Give me a break... that’s embarrassing, like 10 pilots

NewGuy01 06-08-2019 07:25 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834025)
Give me a break... that’s embarrassing, like 10 pilots



Since we are such a small group... percentage n’ stuff.

Again, it’s just math.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

echelon 06-08-2019 08:14 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834025)
Give me a break... that’s embarrassing, like 10 pilots

How many pilots do you think left UAL to come to Alaska? Or DAL or SWA or FDX for that matter?

OTZeagle1 06-08-2019 09:32 PM

Since you asked recently I know of 1 UPS 1 United.

AS management is unconcerned about our trickle out. There are still plenty of people waiting to get in. I get it, you are not happy, but pretending our minuscule attrition will suddenly afford you a windfall is naive and childish. Management only laughs at us because they know how inaccurate your assertions are. We will get what we can negotiate and yes many people are still waiting in lines to come here.

OTZeagle1 06-08-2019 09:37 PM


Originally Posted by NewGuy01 (Post 2834057)
Since we are such a small group... percentage n’ stuff.

Again, it’s just math.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is 10 divided by 3000 you idiot. It’s just math yeah .003 %.

ShyGuy 06-08-2019 09:46 PM

If ya want to call someone an idiot and do the math, at least get the math right :D

To make a percentage you multiply by 100 so it's .33% ;)

OTZeagle1 06-08-2019 10:17 PM

You are correct. I am so sorry and so embarrassed.

Never mind then... “Everyone” is leaving, classes are ending up with 6-8 no shows each month. Company is shaking in their boots.

And well you still can’t find the number of the options we had with the last order. It’s just so hard and you looked everywhere.

ShyGuy 06-08-2019 10:38 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834113)
You are correct. I am so sorry and so embarrassed.

Never mind then... “Everyone” is leaving, classes are ending up with 6-8 no shows each month. Company is shaking in their boots.

And well you still can’t find the number of the options we had with the last order. It’s just so hard and you looked everywhere.

I never said attrition was an issue. It wasn't in the past, isn't now, and won't be in the future. We also hire very small amounts compared to other airlines so there won't be any problems attracting people here. Turns out west coast basing is actually a selling point.

I found the options. "We also have options to acquire up to 37 additional B737 aircraft with deliveries from 2021 through 2024." Hardly anything to write home about.

NewGuy01 06-09-2019 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834103)
What is 10 divided by 3000 you idiot. It’s just math yeah .003 %.



Welp.

There are others leaving for Delta, FEDEX, UPS et al. So I’d say the percentage is closer to 5%.

Still with 2500 pilots applying every window for less than 100 spots...

We actually have a historical precedent to determine when Angle Lake would consider changing things to reduce attrition. Just look at the numbers from the Horizon meltdown a couple of years ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thrill 06-09-2019 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834025)
Give me a break... that’s embarrassing, like 10 pilots



7 actually. Out of 21 resigned/soon to resign pilots, 7, at least, have gone to UA. That’s nearly double the next most popular destination of DL, at 4. A sprinkling to B6, HA, AA, etc...hence my statement. I don’t make up the numbers OTZ, and I’m not reading into them either. Just providing some facts....

Yes, one came from FX. Made sense for him to do so.

Attrition isn’t killing the company. It is running higher this year than last, YTD.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

ForeverJunior 06-09-2019 06:18 PM


Originally Posted by Thrill (Post 2834350)
7 actually. Out of 21 resigned/soon to resign pilots, 7, at least, have gone to UA. That’s nearly double the next most popular destination of DL, at 4. A sprinkling to B6, HA, AA, etc...hence my statement. I don’t make up the numbers OTZ, and I’m not reading into them either. Just providing some facts....

Yes, one came from FX. Made sense for him to do so.

Attrition isn’t killing the company. It is running higher this year than last, YTD.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What number would make the company take notice? More than 50 a year for a couple of years?

Not saying that will happen. I'm just curious what management's unacceptable attrition number is when it comes to junior FOs leaving for other airlines.

NewGuy01 06-09-2019 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by ForeverJunior (Post 2834496)
What number would make the company take notice? More than 50 a year for a couple of years?



Not saying that will happen. I'm just curious what management's unacceptable attrition number is when it comes to junior FOs leaving for other airlines.



Look at the horizon meltdown to determine this. Hint: the answer isn’t good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ShyGuy 06-09-2019 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by NewGuy01 (Post 2834217)
Welp.

There are others leaving for Delta, FEDEX, UPS et al. So I’d say the percentage is closer to 5%.

Still with 2500 pilots applying every window for less than 100 spots...

We actually have a historical precedent to determine when Angle Lake would consider changing things to reduce attrition. Just look at the numbers from the Horizon meltdown a couple of years ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


5% would be 150/yr leaving to other airlines. Our numbers aren't that high. They publish attrition lists so everyone can see it. Since retirement dates are posted in that same document you can do the math and see guys that are retiring versus leaving for other airlines. The numbers are very low.

Packrat 06-10-2019 08:31 AM

They used to have a tolerance of 10% flight cancellation a day for maintenance issues. To extrapolate, unless they're cancelling 10% of flights A DAY for lack of crew they won't consider it a problem. Even then, they can cover that to a certain extent with VSA.

WhaleSurfing 06-10-2019 12:25 PM


Originally Posted by OTZeagle1 (Post 2834103)
What is 10 divided by 3000 you idiot. It’s just math yeah .003 %.

You don’t do much math do you? You might want to rethink that. It’s just math. Who’s the idiot?

NewGuy01 06-10-2019 12:43 PM


Originally Posted by WhaleSurfing (Post 2834800)
You don’t do much math do you? You might want to rethink that. It’s just math. Who’s the idiot?



To be fair I forgot the . in front of my 5% figure. But I didn’t call anyone an idiot...

Sadly that interaction is pretty typical of my “CRM” experiences at AS thus far. At least as a SEA FO.

I wish things were different, but they aren’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DangleDunlops 06-10-2019 01:03 PM

Keep updating your app. I was a Seattle FO for a bit, I feel your pain.

I didn’t make it to my second anniversary at AS before I left.

I wish you all well, but the sentiment at the bottom is far more bleak than the more senior crowd would care to acknowledge.

Packrat 06-10-2019 01:14 PM


Originally Posted by DangleDunlops (Post 2834814)
I wish you all well, but the sentiment at the bottom is far more bleak than the more senior crowd would care to acknowledge.

As I've said before, hopefully the "sentiment at the bottom" along with the VXers have radicalized the pilot group enough to take control of the MEC and the NC. That's the only way the contracts are going to get better.

Flaps1check 06-10-2019 07:03 PM


Originally Posted by Packrat (Post 2834817)
As I've said before, hopefully the "sentiment at the bottom" along with the VXers have radicalized the pilot group enough to take control of the MEC and the NC. That's the only way the contracts are going to get better.

New vacancy bid. Hmm

Mea25000 06-11-2019 09:18 AM

Shocking bid... Grow LAX 737 limiting movement and training costs. This is the plan tell those Max’s start coming on board. You have to hand it to management, they are not stupid.

Avsafety414 06-11-2019 09:28 AM

Does the vacancy have new hires on it?

ShyGuy 06-11-2019 12:29 PM


Originally Posted by Avsafety414 (Post 2835178)
Does the vacancy have new hires on it?

Yes. This vacancy will create 32 newhire FO positions. The previous vacancy created 26 newhire FOs, 26 SFO and 3 Airbus LAX. That's 58 newhire positions for future classes. Bids are effective Sept 1st and Nov 1st respectively. Hiring window opens July 1st apparently.

Avsafety414 06-11-2019 12:34 PM

Cool, Thank you

Back2future 06-11-2019 02:27 PM


Originally Posted by Mea25000 (Post 2835174)
Shocking bid... Grow LAX 737 limiting movement and training costs. This is the plan tell those Max’s start coming on board. You have to hand it to management, they are not stupid.

I would guess that everyone of those slots will be filled by airbus pilots looking for greener grass. If the company chooses to fill the airbus vacancies is another question.

NotTellin 06-11-2019 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by Back2future (Post 2835303)
I would guess that everyone of those slots will be filled by airbus pilots looking for greener grass. If the company chooses to fill the airbus vacancies is another question.

As they have not announced a reduction, any Airbus vacancies created will be filled.

PokerPilot007 06-12-2019 06:33 AM

Not till December
 
FAA official just stated that the MAX will likely be ungrounded and re-certified by December. Highly doubt MEA’s prediction of a huge ALK order in August will come true if this timeline is accurate

Mea25000 06-12-2019 10:14 AM


Originally Posted by PokerPilot007 (Post 2835514)
FAA official just stated that the MAX will likely be ungrounded and re-certified by December. Highly doubt MEA’s prediction of a huge ALK order in August will come true if this timeline is accurate

I don’t think I could have been more clear but obviously some are still having trouble.... the Max order will not be announced until after the Max is actually flying again. The last Boeing update had the paper work done by late June early July. There is then some maintenance that needs to happen which would likely have the planes flying again in August. If this timeline slips then so does the formal announcement of Alaska’s return to a single fleet type.

WutFace 06-12-2019 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by Mea25000 (Post 2830490)
Check back August 9th... tell me what you think of them 🍎 ‘s

Yup. Totally ambiguous and non-specific prediction here.

Stop gaslighting and go back to your hole.

Mea25000 06-12-2019 03:56 PM

Well as it stands right now, yes August 9th you will have your announcement

busbusbaby 06-12-2019 05:22 PM


Originally Posted by Back2future (Post 2835303)
I would guess that everyone of those slots will be filled by airbus pilots looking for greener grass. If the company chooses to fill the airbus vacancies is another question.

Hate to tell you but the pastures are far from greener on the 73 side. The only airbus guys going to the 73 would be so they can be based at home. ie PDX,SEA

waterboy 06-12-2019 07:36 PM


Originally Posted by Mea25000 (Post 2832607)
Deal will not be announced until MAX is flying again. Order roomer sounds spot on plus options.


Originally Posted by Mea25000 (Post 2835784)
Well as it stands right now, yes August 9th you will have your announcement

So you not only know inside info at Alaska but at the FAA too? You are amazing.

ShyGuy 06-12-2019 07:36 PM


Originally Posted by busbusbaby (Post 2835823)
Hate to tell you but the pastures are far from greener on the 73 side. The only airbus guys going to the 73 would be so they can be based at home. ie PDX,SEA

True. But in LAX it's a different story. The FOs bid the 737 for the upgrade and some FOs did Boeing for the better relative seniority in LA. On the Airbus side, it was senior Boeing CAs who bid over to be #1 and #2 in base. Can't say I blame them, they're just taking advantage of the system.

Mea25000 06-12-2019 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by waterboy (Post 2835878)
So you not only know inside info at Alaska but at the FAA too? You are amazing.


Shocking as it may sound but Alaska is in regular contact with Boeing and what Boeing is telling Alaska is the timeline I was sharing.

A lot of Airbus FO’s do significantly better on the Boeing, Captain’s on the Airbus is a different story.

av8or 06-12-2019 08:07 PM


Originally Posted by waterboy (Post 2835878)
So you not only know inside info at Alaska but at the FAA too? You are amazing.

Not that he/she needs MY defense but, MEA just shares what they know in an effort to convey some data. MEA doesn’t pontificate or prognosticate. It’s just info at the time. It might change. It might not. It’s just data as they have heard/understand it.

Geez Louise..... whine when you don’t have some intel. Whine when ya do and ridicule the messenger. MEA doesn’t post to say “look at me I’m all knowing”. Just, “here’s what I know of the plan... for now.... hopefully it helps”.
Take it with a grain of salt. Ignore it. Bank on it.... whatever.... but for the love..... quit throwing darts at the messenger.

conquestdz 06-12-2019 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 2835879)
True. But in LAX it's a different story. The FOs bid the 737 for the upgrade and some FOs did Boeing for the better relative seniority in LA. On the Airbus side, it was senior Boeing CAs who bid over to be #1 and #2 in base. Can't say I blame them, they're just taking advantage of the system.

I bid LAX 73 because my seniority makes me a solid lineholder there rather than reserve in SFO. Reserve sucks severely at Alaska and commuting to it in SFO is even worse. After almost 2 years of it I'm well versed. Another bitter pill is the large number of people junior to me in SEA, where I really want to be based, but can't hold, because of how "smart" Angle Lake is when they put out bids. Pilots around my seniority have been holding lines in Seattle for close to a year. That's a year of not making over guarantee, $400 a month crashpads, missed time with my family due to commutes and minimum days off. As to the survey they sent asking why I'm leaving the bus, they can put this info in their data pipe and smoke it.

lowflying 06-12-2019 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by busbusbaby (Post 2835823)
Hate to tell you but the pastures are far from greener on the 73 side. The only airbus guys going to the 73 would be so they can be based at home. ie PDX,SEA

I couldn't agree more. I was referencing Aesop and one of his many fables about people's foolish decisions and based on some of the off the wall statements I've heard from pilots on both fleets Aesop nailed it.

Guys in 73' miss "their" West coast flying and the Airbus people miss "their" transcons. I guess we'll see when the results are posted...

Mudhen200 06-13-2019 06:52 AM

Can I get an amen!
 

Originally Posted by av8or (Post 2835891)
Not that he/she needs MY defense but, MEA just shares what they know in an effort to convey some data. MEA doesn’t pontificate or prognosticate. It’s just info at the time. It might change. It might not. It’s just data as they have heard/understand it.

Geez Louise..... whine when you don’t have some intel. Whine when ya do and ridicule the messenger. MEA doesn’t post to say “look at me I’m all knowing”. Just, “here’s what I know of the plan... for now.... hopefully it helps”.
Take it with a grain of salt. Ignore it. Bank on it.... whatever.... but for the love..... quit throwing darts at the messenger.

100% agree! Kids these days...

AnchorDown 06-13-2019 07:19 AM


Originally Posted by av8or (Post 2835891)
Not that he/she needs MY defense but, MEA just shares what they know in an effort to convey some data. MEA doesn’t pontificate or prognosticate. It’s just info at the time. It might change. It might not. It’s just data as they have heard/understand it.

Geez Louise..... whine when you don’t have some intel. Whine when ya do and ridicule the messenger. MEA doesn’t post to say “look at me I’m all knowing”. Just, “here’s what I know of the plan... for now.... hopefully it helps”.
Take it with a grain of salt. Ignore it. Bank on it.... whatever.... but for the love..... quit throwing darts at the messenger.

Well said Av8or, I look at the message like college football preseason polls, do I bank on the information given? Hell no. Are they accurate? Maybe, maybe not. I appreciate MEA's information, accurate or not, in my opinion he/she has been more right than wrong and appreciate the info. Thanks MEA for not caving to the whiners. Appreciate the info.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands