Proudly All Boeing?
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Will Alaska management ever remove the “Proudly All Boeing” off of the 737s nose? As an Airbus driver elsewhere it seems kind of silly since, at least on the surface AK has embraced the BUS and has a mixed fleet. Or is it temporary until they can be replaced by 737s? Now that the fence is down, have any BUS pilots transitioned to the 73? And how many vice versa?
#3
OTZEagle1
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Alaska is days away from announcing a large 737 MAX order....Count to ten after the MAX certification is complete, the buses will be quickly going away. Yes, pilots have transitioned in both directions. Both D-8s and E175s are not flown by Alaska pilots, they are not on an Alaska Certificate, they are regional planes flown by Skywest and Horizon. I can understand your angst but it is pretty simple.
#6
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
AS would be be better off sticking with "proudly MAX free" for a while until the dust settles. Even though they have no MAXes yet, I bet if they announce they're getting some, it will scare some pax off. In a year the public will have forgotten. They got lucky (or smart) with their timing, why throw that away. Unless they think it will play well to the home-town demographic...
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Why would they do that? SW/AA/UA have to get them back in the air, but they've already acknowledged many pax won't fly on them.
AS would be be better off sticking with "proudly MAX free" for a while until the dust settles. Even though they have no MAXes yet, I bet if they announce they're getting some, it will scare some pax off. In a year the public will have forgotten. They got lucky (or smart) with their timing, why throw that away. Unless they think it will play well to the home-town demographic...
AS would be be better off sticking with "proudly MAX free" for a while until the dust settles. Even though they have no MAXes yet, I bet if they announce they're getting some, it will scare some pax off. In a year the public will have forgotten. They got lucky (or smart) with their timing, why throw that away. Unless they think it will play well to the home-town demographic...
#8
OTZEagle1
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Why would they do that? SW/AA/UA have to get them back in the air, but they've already acknowledged many pax won't fly on them.
AS would be be better off sticking with "proudly MAX free" for a while until the dust settles. Even though they have no MAXes yet, I bet if they announce they're getting some, it will scare some pax off. In a year the public will have forgotten. They got lucky (or smart) with their timing, why throw that away. Unless they think it will play well to the home-town demographic...
AS would be be better off sticking with "proudly MAX free" for a while until the dust settles. Even though they have no MAXes yet, I bet if they announce they're getting some, it will scare some pax off. In a year the public will have forgotten. They got lucky (or smart) with their timing, why throw that away. Unless they think it will play well to the home-town demographic...
#9
OTZEagle1
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
#10
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,847
Likes: 653
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
But I'm a pilot because I choose to be. Has nothing to do with the price of Boeings in China.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



