Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Old 08-19-2022 | 10:36 PM
  #6781  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tireteapot
Big thing is cost of living. Say I move my family to Bay Area…no way we get something comparable to what we have here. Especially with rates now. Another $1000 a month in housing at least. Plus high utilities. Higher gas prices to commute 2-3 hours to SFO since that’s all we could afford.

Another big one is Cali state income tax. Factor 10%. At top end United 737 pay, take home would actually be less than top end 737 Alaska pay.

Or I commute for 35 years. Not sure I’d enjoy that with a young family. Say United has 4 days more off a month. I’d eat a few of those in commuting. Doesn’t exactly seem worth it. Tough decisions.
Don't overthink it is my opinion. And don't base it on money decisions. Sadly, many pilots do that when family and QOL matter the most and should be the first consideration. You guys in the 23-34 range coming out of the regional/CFI world have it so much better than almost any other group you'll ever fly with at this level.

Don't forget that and also take the time to acknowledge to yourself how lucky you guys are when you have your interactions with grumpy captains 😁. Almost any decision you make is going to be a good one with some trade offs though.

I won't tell you where to choose but I know that decisions about flexibility in where to live, what to fly, and financial stability are things your 60 year old self will be happy your 30 year old self took the time to consider.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 08:36 AM
  #6782  
Flyboy8784's Avatar
Am I Wrong??????????
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
The new contract as all others before it in my time will not change the job. Alaska corporate and flights ops will be drilling holes through the contract before it is effective. There is no and I mean no desire for Alaska Airlines to change who they are. Contracts don’t change that. So maybe you will find something that works for you…for all of the pre-merger Alaska crowd it will just be pay rates. For the post merger crowd it will be all over the place. Reserve, commuting, scheduling, training…You name it. Any contractural provision that requires IT will be 2-4 years out after a contract is signed. So TA1 gets voted down in Nov. TA2 comes along in March. Contract signed by summer. So 2023 will come and go with very few changes other than money. We will start to see small changes in 2024 and full implementation late 2024 to mid 2025. If that is the window prospective hires are looking at then they are doing their homework. 40% of the pilot group will still dislike to outright hate this airline after a contract is signed.
Man, I get the resignation type thought pattern because you've been here a while, but that's a **** poor way of lookin at the future right now. The MEC has taken all of this into account. That's why you'll hear on the podcasts and the coffee sits that they aren't interested in dragging a TA across the finish line with a 51% Yes vote.

Especially given the scrutiny and turmoil that's going on in the UAL MEC?The recall votes have already started on the LEC and NC level. Our MEC knows exactly what's on the line. They're gonna get it right. Having done ALPA work for 15 years, I can say beyond question that this is the most squared away leadership that I've ever seen. I know we all feel the same way about the MGMT here, but having said that, they had a great run the last 20 years of not having a unified pilot group.

The picketing events and the strike authorization vote were a huge wakeup call to both the C-Suite execs as well as the BOD. Top that off with record attrition, Uniteds possible TA, AA/DAL rounding the corner as well, they woke up and finally started playing ball. Call your reps....i've heard nothing but positives coming from mine (which is the first time in YEARS). Not to mention we've got "schmuck insurance" built in to what we are asking for which will ensure this pilot group won't fall behind again. I constantly tell pilots to call their reps and I know that everyone who does feels way better after they get off the call.

Last edited by Flyboy8784; 08-20-2022 at 08:42 AM. Reason: update
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 08:53 AM
  #6783  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 682
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy8784
Not to mention we've got "schmuck insurance" built in to what we are asking for which will ensure this pilot group won't fall behind again.
That's great, but pay rates are only one small piece of the puzzle. I don't want to get paid DAL rates to work more days per month than them, or have worse QOL on reserve when I upgrade.

I'm very well convinced of our union's resolve to push for pay parity. It's the resolve to push for equal or better QOL that I'm skeptical of, AFTER having talked with my rep and the NC. Granted that was months ago and things have probably evolved a lot since then so I am awaiting a TA with an open mind.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 10:07 AM
  #6784  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

The QoL issue literally would require a complete re-write of section 25 since it really is just bad all around and I sincerely hope that is what is being done since it’s dragging on still to this day. However, what also concerns me is some of ALPA’s ‘fatigue’ mitigation policies that are in place and a relic from before FAR117 and those alone can result in terribly unproductive/non-commutable trips on its own and just the combination of both of those factors has me concerned about any meaningful improvement in QoL.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 12:02 PM
  #6785  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by echelon
That's great, but pay rates are only one small piece of the puzzle. I don't want to get paid DAL rates to work more days per month than them, or have worse QOL on reserve when I upgrade.

I'm very well convinced of our union's resolve to push for pay parity. It's the resolve to push for equal or better QOL that I'm skeptical of, AFTER having talked with my rep and the NC. Granted that was months ago and things have probably evolved a lot since then so I am awaiting a TA with an open mind.
Exactly this. This is why I feel it's a mistake to go first in this cycle. The Big 4 are going to get sizeable improvements shortly, and once again we'll be behind the curve. Alaska MEC should be letting the big boys blaze the trail for them.

Management understands this and is sprinting to the finish line. I hope the NC is asking for the moon during this "productive" period of negotiations.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 01:48 PM
  #6786  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Vote No, we are first, we got some really nice protection as the tide rises. We are a company where 71% of the pilots drive to work.Our contract will be cool, hip, and refreshed. It won’t be perfect for you, it won’t be perfect for me, but it will change all of our lives significantly for the better. I hear it could be out mid September. MEC’s are talking, NC’s are talking, we are all going after the same gains. Our contracts in the end will all be very similar. If your in the angry 50 on here, you will hate the new contract, if you commute across the entire country you will hate the new contract, it’s hard to fix either of those predicaments, but if they look at it honestly it’s a huge win…they won’t or maybe can’t.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 02:08 PM
  #6787  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Vote No, we are first, we got some really nice protection as the tide rises. We are a company where 71% of the pilots drive to work.Our contract will be cool, hip, and refreshed. It won’t be perfect for you, it won’t be perfect for me, but it will change all of our lives significantly for the better. I hear it could be out mid September. MEC’s are talking, NC’s are talking, we are all going after the same gains. Our contracts in the end will all be very similar. If your in the angry 50 on here, you will hate the new contract, if you commute across the entire country you will hate the new contract, it’s hard to fix either of those predicaments, but if they look at it honestly it’s a huge win…they won’t or maybe can’t.
Just stop. You don't know sh*t. Stop pretending that you do.

You were able to fool some people, but that was 2 years and a dozen missed predictions ago.

Your credibility is shot.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 02:42 PM
  #6788  
Av8rRr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Vote No, we are first, we got some really nice protection as the tide rises. We are a company where 71% of the pilots drive to work.Our contract will be cool, hip, and refreshed. It won’t be perfect for you, it won’t be perfect for me, but it will change all of our lives significantly for the better. I hear it could be out mid September. MEC’s are talking, NC’s are talking, we are all going after the same gains. Our contracts in the end will all be very similar. If your in the angry 50 on here, you will hate the new contract, if you commute across the entire country you will hate the new contract, it’s hard to fix either of those predicaments, but if they look at it honestly it’s a huge win…they won’t or maybe can’t.
Everyone always says they voted “no”…. yet, somehow it still always passes. Regardless, according to OTZ come November, we’ll be singing a different tune. Can’t wait to “Fly The Friendly Skies” 😂
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 04:53 PM
  #6789  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
Just stop. You don't know sh*t. Stop pretending that you do.

You were able to fool some people, but that was 2 years and a dozen missed predictions ago.

Your credibility is shot.
I will bite… company is at 300 union is at 318… NAVBLUE Union controlled. I would give more but I think that would be a negative for our negotiating team.

And yes, there is a strong possibility you will be flying the friendliest sky’s soon… I can imagine full integration wouldn’t be until 2025 though.
Reply
Old 08-20-2022 | 05:04 PM
  #6790  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I will bite… company is at 300 union is at 318… NAVBLUE Union controlled. I would give more but I think that would be a negative for our negotiating team.

And yes, there is a strong possibility you will be flying the friendliest sky’s soon… I can imagine full integration wouldn’t be until 2025 though.
I don't know how you can feel good about that when United's notorious Tumi TA was at $327. It was so embarrassing that they didn't even finish the vote.

This only affirms my opinion that we should be sitting on our hands. The next round of contracts coming out of the big 3 will blow 318 out of the water.


You'll forgive me if I don't trust your opinion in these matters. You've got a long track record of working harder for less, and being proud of it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices