![]() |
Originally Posted by beancounter
(Post 2468640)
There wasn't even a wide body fence with AA/US Airways, almost guarantee there won't be a narrow body one with Alaska/Virgin. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think this will go well for the legacy Alaska guys and gals.
One upside for AK is a default fence between the Bus and Boeing. I don't see a whole lot of people wanting to go through 3 months of training to get the same pay. Some will for base reasons but not many. No one asked for any of this, so blaming either pilot group for anything is ridiculous. |
Originally Posted by AJ Crowley
(Post 2468448)
For the AS and VX pilot this thread is not only pointless, it is harmful. We will all be coworkers after the SLI, and at some point sharing cockpits. If you feel strongly about the SLI call or email your reps, but stop posting here.
|
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2468850)
Oh let everyone dream and vent... this will take a while to get done. It is something we are all very passionate about because the results are so final, affecting the quality of our lives for the rest of our careers. When it is all done it may sting for a short while but the outcome I am confident will leave most unharmed. A few will probably end up hitting a home run, hopefully those few will have some class when that happens. I am sure a few really will get the short end, to those I am honestly sorry. In the end we will all be ok.
|
Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
(Post 2468813)
Agreed. I'm prepared for a complete screw job. VX has absolutely nothing to lose in any of this. The Arbitration panel is required to consider the effects of Longevity...how much they weigh that is obviously unknown. It will be interesting to see as the longevity disparity is unprecedented.
One upside for AK is a default fence between the Bus and Boeing. I don't see a whole lot of people wanting to go through 3 months of training to get the same pay. Some will for base reasons but not many. No one asked for any of this, so blaming either pilot group for anything is ridiculous. First in our SLI 8 years of longevity difference between pilots moved the seniority percentage about 3%. That was with a 35% weighting for longevity. I have no idea of the voodoo math behind the algorithm they used. Second, there were many UAL pilots who were on reserve on the Airbus, who post-SLI could be in the top 10% of the 737, MANY of them did exactly what you mentioned and switched to the exact same pay category just for seniority. Also, each pilot group flooded into the other legacy bases. UAL pilots living in TX came into IAH in big numbers. Friends of mine in EWR complained about moving down the 737 Captain list as UAL pilots bid into that base. CAL pilots had no problems filling vacancies in ORD, LAX, DEN, SFO, and IAD because we had pilots living in the area that were commuting previously. We still have guys that argue over our SLI and that was 4 years ago! |
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2468872)
Two things here.
First in our SLI 8 years of longevity difference between pilots moved the seniority percentage about 3%. That was with a 35% weighting for longevity. I have no idea of the voodoo math behind the algorithm they used. Second, there were many UAL pilots who were on reserve on the Airbus, who post-SLI could be in the top 10% of the 737, MANY of them did exactly what you mentioned and switched to the exact same pay category just for seniority. Also, each pilot group flooded into the other legacy bases. UAL pilots living in TX came into IAH in big numbers. Friends of mine in EWR complained about moving down the 737 Captain list as UAL pilots bid into that base. CAL pilots had no problems filling vacancies in ORD, LAX, DEN, SFO, and IAD because we had pilots living in the area that were commuting previously. We still have guys that argue over our SLI and that was 4 years ago! |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 2468930)
If both sides are complaining equally (or close to it), it probably was a good SLI.
|
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2468960)
What's most funny is that each of the bottom 1/3 of each airline, remained in the bottom 1/3 overall, but complained that they got screwed.
The "screw job" comes from pre SLI expectations. If guys look at relative seniority and are able to keep the same QOL/base/airframe/seat/upgrade potential they had pre-merger, then you really can't hope for anything more than that. It's when guy do the pecker-measuring pre-merger and thing they're going to "buy" some other airline, or because they're the bigger/better/badder airline so they should gain some kind of advantage from it, that's when the anger/disappointment come in full force. |
Originally Posted by BunkerF16
(Post 2468982)
The "screw job" comes from pre SLI expectations. If guys look at relative seniority and are able to keep the same QOL/base/airframe/seat/upgrade potential they had pre-merger, then you really can't hope for anything more than that.
It's when guy do the pecker-measuring pre-merger and thing they're going to "buy" some other airline, or because they're the bigger/better/badder airline so they should gain some kind of advantage from it, that's when the anger/disappointment come in full force. |
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2469067)
This SLI has the potential of making the east vs. west debacle look good.
To sum up his comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHjlM5A1jME |
Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
(Post 2468813)
One upside for AK is a default fence between the Bus and Boeing. I don't see a whole lot of people wanting to go through 3 months of training to get the same pay. Some will for base reasons but not many. No one asked for any of this, so blaming either pilot group for anything is ridiculous.
Not trying to start a war, I'm just genuinely curious to know what the AS and VX pilots think and how it might color your perspectives on the integration. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands