![]() |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2454260)
Wth is a protected pilot
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2454130)
Every CA (737) I fly with is 55+ ... not a single one is waiting till 65. I'm curious how many pilots are leaving early.
|
Originally Posted by Andrew_VT
(Post 2454201)
Do you also believe them when they tell you they're married to French supermodels or own their own Gulfstreams?
Ran the info through a google his wife runs a roofing business out of their house in GA. I think she was a model a LONG time ago. I honestly wasn’t aware someone could BS that much and do it so eloquently... |
Originally Posted by TrinityDawn
(Post 2454314)
A further modification of the protected pilot agreement occurred with the signing of the second bankruptcy contract. Upon delivery of the 40th E-175 to envoy (which we have received now) the flow for the protected pilot group goes up to 50% of AA new hire classes, meterable to 25. (I'm not going to include the exact text, but that's the gist.) So, the contractual flow rate for envoy during the protected pilot group does actually take AA class size into consideration. That's all I was pointing out. Unfortunately, the company has chosen to go with the minimum they think they can get away with, and not the spirit and intent of the agreement.
|
Deleted........
|
Originally Posted by TrinityDawn
(Post 2454157)
That's not quite correct. The "protected pilot" flow at envoy that was the result of a grievance settlement is *supposed* to give us 50% of new hire class slots at AA for everyone still here that was hired before OCT of '11. However, the company has chosen to take the minimum metering of 25/mo as the target instead, which the union is grieving (for all the good it will do.) We should flow 450 from envoy next year, but my guess is it will end up being 300 despite the contract language. Just another broken promise.
|
Originally Posted by TrinityDawn
(Post 2454314)
Upon delivery of the 40th E-175 to envoy (which we have received now) the flow for the protected pilot group goes up to 50% of AA new hire classes, meterable to 25.
In other words, if AA hires more than 600 pilots per year (50 per month) the max of 25 per month (300 per year) is reached. All the caveats apply about any month without a class will decrease the 300 per year by 25, etc., etc. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2454326)
LOL I know exactly who you are talking about!
Ran the info through a google his wife runs a roofing business out of their house in GA. I think she was a model a LONG time ago. I honestly wasn’t aware someone could BS that much and do it so eloquently... |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2454594)
Zip in his step.
|
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 2454506)
Stated in plain English, Envoy’s flow of the current Protected Pilots is the LESSER of 50% of the AA new hire class or 25 per month. Is that what everyone understands?
|
Originally Posted by GodIsGood
(Post 2454838)
It's not the lesser of the two. The language states 50% of the new hire classes at AA will be flow through from Envoy. However, Envoy management can restrict that to 25 if they claim the 50% would cause operational difficulty. Envoy hired over 100 pilots last month alone but we still metered to 25. Operational difficulty is very subjective.
|
Can AA meter all three WO to zero and hire like other airline do?
|
Originally Posted by Doctor
(Post 2454321)
With SMP starting in January, I'm thinking many will leave earlier now that they have medical insurance to carry them to 65 until medicare kicks in.
Amongst A scalers it was more like 60% left around 60 and 40% stayed to 65. Avg retirement age was 62. Now it's 64. Ninety percent stay to 65, 10% leave around 60. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2454594)
She looks younger than him, but the VS supermodel, G5 and the partying claims? I don’t think he’s got that much Zip in his step.
Nice guy too, he didn’t need to fabricate his life. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2454326)
LOL I know exactly who you are talking about!
Ran the info through a google his wife runs a roofing business out of their house in GA. I think she was a model a LONG time ago. I honestly wasn’t aware someone could BS that much and do it so eloquently... That guy is completely delusional |
Originally Posted by AFTrainerGuy
(Post 2455048)
Dont forget the Ruth Chris Steakhouse he owns of the penthouse in the Aria. Last trip I had played a game that every time he set his hooks to talk the BS, I changed discussion and wouldn’t let him spout his stuff. Over 4 days, I never let him get one of his lies outof his mouth. Amused me to no end and I’m sure frustrated him. I even watched him build the pics on photoshop while we flew.
That guy is completely delusional |
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2455059)
Where's Richie Rich based?
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2455096)
Charlotte. Used to always fly redeyes.
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2455100)
Ouch! Rumor has it one of Miami finest went to CLT, he even switched airplanes :-/
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2454936)
Can AA meter all three WO to zero and hire like other airline do?
|
Originally Posted by AFTrainerGuy
(Post 2455048)
Dont forget the Ruth Chris Steakhouse he owns of the penthouse in the Aria. Last trip I had played a game that every time he set his hooks to talk the BS, I changed discussion and wouldn’t let him spout his stuff. Over 4 days, I never let him get one of his lies outof his mouth. Amused me to no end and I’m sure frustrated him. I even watched him build the pics on photoshop while we flew.
That guy is completely delusional I made the mistake of going out for beers with him. On the one hand he's basically telling me his wife makes more in a week than he makes in a year, then he didn't even pick up the beer tab... "So you spent $50k commuting from LAX to CLT on a G5 to make $3k on this red eye?" |
Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
(Post 2455139)
Any paperclips used on the Bus for holding stuff like the ATIS/WX or Load Closeout?
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2454338)
Regardless of what you guys have going on at Eagle/Envoy.. next year you'll flow roughly 300-400 another 150 will come from PDT and PSA . That would leave roughly 300-400 to come from military or civilian.
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 2455096)
Charlotte. Used to always fly redeyes.
|
Originally Posted by sumwherelse
(Post 2455309)
I flew a Vegas red eye with him a couple years ago. Was trying to figure out why we were eating at the hotel bar if he owns a Ruth’s Chris. And why weren’t we partying with his super hot wife and all her friends who happened to be in town that night????
|
Originally Posted by Dolphinflyer
(Post 2455139)
Any paperclips used on the Bus for holding stuff like the ATIS/WX or Load Closeout?
|
Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
(Post 2455183)
No they can’t. At least for PSA they can hold till December but all Flow pilots must go before December 31st if hiring was done at AA.
We only have 2 classes scheduled for 2017. PSA would have to put 45 + pilots to meet their annual flow obligation. |
Originally Posted by sumwherelse
(Post 2455309)
I flew a Vegas red eye with him a couple years ago. Was trying to figure out why we were eating at the hotel bar if he owns a Ruth’s Chris. And why weren’t we partying with his super hot wife and all her friends who happened to be in town that night????
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2455632)
If my wife had a G5 you losers would be history and you’d definitely never find me flying a LAS-CLT redeye
Unless it was in the back of my wife’s G5. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2455632)
If my wife had a G5 you losers would be history and you’d definitely never find me flying a LAS-CLT redeye
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 2454130)
Every CA (737) I fly with is 55+ ... not a single one is waiting till 65. I'm curious how many pilots are leaving early.
I have yet to come across any who actually do it . |
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2456591)
A LOT of guys say that.
I have yet to come across any who actually do it . |
Originally Posted by jcountry
(Post 2456591)
A LOT of guys say that.
I have yet to come across any who actually do it . |
A guy publishes monthly retirement data. Ten percent leave at an avg age of 60, 90% stay to 65.
|
10/29/2017 - 12/31/2017 201
01/01/2018 - 12/31/2018 528 01/01/2019 - 12/31/2019 637 01/01/2020 - 12/31/2020 772 01/01/2021 - 12/31/2021 838 01/01/2022 - 12/31/2022 861 01/01/2023 - 12/31/2023 957 Retirements at age 65 so 900 doesn't seem out of line to stay ahead of attrition. (and early retirements of course!) |
The company's estimate for 2017 retirements looked like they were using know retirements and adding 15%. That's close to the historical average I tracked years ago. That would indicate perhaps 607 retirements next year.
Using the recent actually retirements with 10% coming from guys averaging 60 yrs old would indicate perhaps 627 reitementes next year. 528 + 10% of 2023's. Two assumptions = 617 +/- 10. Hiring nine hundred next year would result in apaprox a two percent increase in manning which is approx the same percentage as the long term expected growth in the industry. So nothing unexpected in those percentages. |
Junior CA upgrade will go to mid 2013 hires in NY if they want it. Wide body FO will be mid to late 2013 hires on this next bid. That's my prediction. Things are clicking big time. Expect lots of movement.
|
Originally Posted by LIOG41
(Post 2459023)
Junior CA upgrade will go to mid 2013 hires in NY if they want it. Wide body FO will be mid to late 2013 hires on this next bid. That's my prediction. Things are clicking big time. Expect lots of movement.
|
Originally Posted by LIOG41
(Post 2459023)
Junior CA upgrade will go to mid 2013 hires in NY if they want it. Wide body FO will be mid to late 2013 hires on this next bid. That's my prediction. Things are clicking big time. Expect lots of movement.
Unless of course you're referring to the E190. |
Originally Posted by LIOG41
(Post 2459023)
Junior CA upgrade will go to mid 2013 hires in NY if they want it. Wide body FO will be mid to late 2013 hires on this next bid. That's my prediction. Things are clicking big time. Expect lots of movement.
The seniority list/DOH gets scrambled because there's a bunch of 2013's mixed with 1999 DOH's, then groups of 2013 DOH's, and alternating 1999 and 2013's, then fewer 2013's mixed with 2001 DOH's. It doesn't become pure 2013 DOH's until 12450 ish. Current junior CA DOH, non AWA, is 3/2001. 10,8xx of 15,xxx. On property is 10,679 of 14,542 (73%). Junior CA percentage used to be 60-65%. Then it dropped closer to 70%. Now it's 73%. That's because the G4 FO job pays the same (FO line holder vs CA rsv) and gives you better relative seniority. So the junior CA is 3,863 numbers senior to the junior guy on the list. That's under five years to upgrade assuming typical retirement patterns. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands