Originally Posted by Mozam
(Post 3078770)
Not all of us have a sugar daddy. :)
Daddy? If y’all didn’t marry a rich flight attendant(female in my situation)well, I’m sorry.😅 |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3079848)
Texas hits 5,000 new coronavirus cases for first time, governor urges people to stay homehttps://www.marketwatch.com/story/te...ome-2020-06-23 Any chance they are going to shut down the training center again? Wonder how bad that would be for us. |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3079848)
Texas hits 5,000 new coronavirus cases for first time, governor urges people to stay homehttps://www.marketwatch.com/story/te...ome-2020-06-23 Any chance they are going to shut down the training center again? Wonder how bad that would be for us. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...667f20f812.jpg Know the reasons cases are increasing. It’s expected. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3079961)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...667f20f812.jpg
Know the reasons cases are increasing. It’s expected. |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3078878)
What would actually happen if bankruptcy occurs.
From reading "hard landing" I learned that executives in the 80s liked bankruptcy because it allowed them to escape ornerous labor agreements, hire scabs to replace everyone, and then emerge leaner and ready to make money. Apparently this isn't the same today, it has changed somehow to be much less attractive and have a much bigger tax on the company than back then. I'm not sure how.
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3078878)
Is there going to be a tipping point where everyone wants to file for chapter 11 just to be first? Or is this the sort of thing where you want to be the last one? AA has a ton of debt but the terms aren't really too bad are they... How much better would the debt be if it was restructured under the best possible realistic terms?
Under the new law I don't think you'd see one BK filing trigger an automatic cascade from everybody else. But if one or two successfully restructure, that could obviously put competitive pressure on others which might ultimately push them over the brink too.
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3078878)
Also, nobody is talking about what it would look like if one of the big three liquidated. They say this is unlikely because who would be there to buy all the assets and pay off the debt. So the best option for the bondholders is to see us through this until there is a vaccine and return to profitability.
Also the fed is likely to intervene if liquidation looms in the near/mid-term. Although if there's sustained economic malaise that reduces demand longer-term it might be politically OK to let one or more airlines fail. |
Thanks rickair. I appreciate it; many mentions of bankruptcy here and elsewhere but I don't believe most pilots know what it actually would mean for them or the airline. It is a nebulous, opaque, but generally bad thing. I think the perception is that at any given company the pilots jobs would be intact but maybe with a less favorable contract. Not many folks talking like they believe there's a strong possibility they'll end up on the street permanently.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3080049)
Worth noting that the court can simply erase obligations to labor and unsecured creditors
Most BK end with a joint negoation the judge signs off on, but if he were to impose, he'd be gambling scab labor would/could be available because the union could still pursue self help. So a judge does have the authority to alter a RLA contract, but that authority does not restrict collective bargaining, or self help. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3080049)
be politically OK to let one or more airlines fail.
|
Is there a traditional percentage number of pilots who are "safe from furlough" that has been passed around for the past few years / decades? Do you think this year's will change that number when used in the future?
|
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081023)
Is there a traditional percentage number of pilots who are "safe from furlough" that has been passed around for the past few years / decades? Do you think this year's will change that number when used in the future?
Not sure, but the men who have the power to furlough us say we’re 1600 fat for next summer, we’ll see what kind of deals can be made. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by bababouey
(Post 3081066)
Not sure, but the men who have the power to furlough us say we’re 1600 fat for next summer, we’ll see what kind of deals can be made.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Kind of. DP was referencing the forecast that was on the vacancy bid I believe which seemed to have a consensus that after all other factors puts us at 1,200 over. I’m new in this game but I think it’s too soon to tell and there would be other signals if we were closer to furlough (larger VPLOA approvals by the company and maybe lowering of age requirement). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081023)
Is there a traditional percentage number of pilots who are "safe from furlough" that has been passed around for the past few years / decades? Do you think this year's will change that number when used in the future?
If a company is going to furlough, it usually the first 10% go rather quickly and then the next 10% would go almost a year later. Unless things are really, really bad then it would be 50%. (We aren't there) I still think the numbers that Dougie floated are posturing and managing expectations. |
I don't dislike DP but I would feel far more comfortable if he was in line with Delta and United on future expectations. SW can afford to bet the farm but for us its do or die. We certainly can hope for more aid but that will largely be out of our hands. The good news is that from the most junior to the most senior we are all in this together. At this point furloughing will provide only marginal relief and probably not enough time to make a difference. It will be tough but I know for myself and the guys I work with life will go on and we will all make the best of it. Its been a nice run while it lasted though!
|
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081021)
wonder if the name "American" dissolving would be prevented by people in whom the name evokes a symbolic meaning.
|
When do initial furlough notices have to go out by at AA?
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3081481)
When do initial furlough notices have to go out by at AA?
JCBA.. Furlough V.3 ”Pilots to be furloughed will be given thirty (30) days' notice before the effective date of the furlough. Such notice will not be applicable in cases of emergency which include, but are not limited to acts of God or a strike by employees of the Company.” |
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 3081540)
JCBA.. Furlough V.3
”Pilots to be furloughed will be given thirty (30) days' notice before the effective date of the furlough. Such notice will not be applicable in cases of emergency which include, but are not limited to acts of God or a strike by employees of the Company.” |
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 3077577)
who is the rick 777 everyone keeps talking about ?
|
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3081548)
Would I be wrong in thinking that the WARN act would apply to us, thus requiring a 60 day advance notice of furlough?
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3081554)
Karen’s Brother.
|
Originally Posted by Saabs
(Post 3081641)
who’s Karen?
|
Originally Posted by Skylarking
(Post 3081757)
Rick 777's sister. See how that works? :D
|
How much does DP stand to personally lose if AAL shares are cancelled?
|
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081861)
How much does DP stand to personally lose if AAL shares are cancelled?
|
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081861)
How much does DP stand to personally lose if AAL shares are cancelled?
|
Originally Posted by Flying101
(Post 3081611)
Good point, didn’t think of the WARN act. I change my answer to: late July
https://www.yahoo.com/news/delta-war...081558782.html |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081861)
How much does DP stand to personally lose if AAL shares are cancelled?
|
Originally Posted by Systemized
(Post 3082064)
All the stock is cancelled in BK and new stock is given to debt holders in exchange for debt relief. DP would lose millions, BK is very bad for him.
|
Originally Posted by Slick111
(Post 3082104)
The last time I checked, (about 6 weeks ago), Parker held about 2 1/2 million shares. You do the math.
|
I don’t like DP and never have. I believe he is lying on his outlook because he’s desperate to raise cash.
|
Originally Posted by Thedude
(Post 3081259)
My personal number is at least 20% off the bottom.
If a company is going to furlough, it usually the first 10% go rather quickly and then the next 10% would go almost a year later. Unless things are really, really bad then it would be 50%. (We aren't there) I still think the numbers that Dougie floated are posturing and managing expectations. |
Originally Posted by Elismcpikle
(Post 3082944)
50% mmmm ya ok, I’d like to see any airline shell 50% and avoid liquidation. Not happening
|
Originally Posted by Thedude
(Post 3083012)
Go back about 15 years and you will see what furloughing 50% looked like.
|
Originally Posted by Elismcpikle
(Post 3082944)
50% mmmm ya ok, I’d like to see any airline shell 50% and avoid liquidation. Not happening
Independence Air? Oh wait, they did shed 50% and then liquidated. My bad...:D |
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
(Post 3083028)
With 40B in debt AA would be sunk if it shrunk to half its size. I understand your point but these are different times.
A good number of my post tend to go over people heads but some do get it. |
Originally Posted by Phil Laschio
(Post 3083033)
Independence Air? Oh wait, they did shed 50% and then liquidated. My bad...:D
|
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3081021)
wonder if the name "American" dissolving would be prevented by people in whom the name evokes a symbolic meaning.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3083074)
These days? It would probably be accompanied by cheering crowds just BECAUSE of the name. After all, that Amerigo Vespucci guy helped Spain enslave a continent.
|
Originally Posted by Phil Laschio
(Post 3083033)
Independence Air? Oh wait, they did shed 50% and then liquidated. My bad...:D
|
Maybe not the best thread to post this but close enough for what is current. Here's what I wish I could of asked Vasu because something doesn't add up. We are hoping to reduce cash burn anyway we can. This even to the point of pulling parking permits from airports we don't normally use which is great. So here it goes:
For July wide body 777/787 flying CLT=0, MIA=0, DFW=12-14 average lines/day, LAX=5-6 average lines/day, ORD=1 line/day, PHL=0, and LGA=0. Total 21 lines per day systemwide. Meanwhile as of August 31st captains alone (on 3xp so add double these amounts for total pilots) CLT=49, MIA=149, DFW=380, LAX=117, ORD=81, PHL=111, and LGA=138. That should add up to 1025 captains and maybe 2000 FO/FB/FC for approximately 3000 total wide body crewmembers. There appears to be a huge disparity between supply and demand. Even if all the excess were on leave making 55 hours per month that's a big cost to carry over until next summer. Am I missing something? Now there is a small bit of domestic mix in the line count above but probably no more than 10-15%. Most think international flying will be the last to return. Conservatively speaking you could at least reduce international wide body staffing by one half and yet no displacements. I dont get it. What strategy do you think AA is formulating if any. Im curious to what others are thinking. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands