![]() |
AA Seniority Calculator
Does AA have a seniority calculator similar to Delta’s widget app where someone could have a rough idea for career progression?
|
Yep.. it’s on AApilots under personal/profile.
|
Originally Posted by JJDriver
(Post 3441929)
Does AA have a seniority calculator similar to Delta’s widget app where someone could have a rough idea for career progression?
Not sure if someone without an employee number can use it though. Perhaps if you have a friend in a new hire class the same age as you they could run the numbers for you. |
Thanks! I may have to look around for a new hire. Just trying to figure out how far I could go if I made the jump.
|
Originally Posted by JJDriver
(Post 3442025)
Thanks! I may have to look around for a new hire. Just trying to figure out how far I could go if I made the jump.
|
Just turned 42
|
Originally Posted by JJDriver
(Post 3442197)
Just turned 42
|
Thank you for the help. I figured being part of the lost generation I probably wouldn’t go too far up the list.
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3442227)
If you’re interested in Widebody international flying I would suggest UAL/FedEx/UPS. If you want to be a 737/320 CA based in DFW, CLT, or MIA then AA is a great option.
|
Originally Posted by 13pro
(Post 3442339)
Does that include WB FO? Or just CA?
|
Don't think we have a tool to project seniority to the number unless you're an active pilot here, but it's safe to say you'd be ~2500 by the time you retire.
|
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 3443167)
Don't think we have a tool to project seniority to the number unless you're an active pilot here, but it's safe to say you'd be ~2500 by the time you retire.
|
Originally Posted by NotPhlying
(Post 3443365)
You can take the age by fleet chart and add it all up, but that would take wayyyy too long. You're right, someone in their early 40s hired today is looking at around 2500 at age 65.
|
What would 2500 be holding?
|
Originally Posted by icohftb
(Post 3443421)
What would 2500 be holding?
|
Our current retirement projections for someone getting hired here at 40+ is still much better than DAL. At least in regards to hiring for retirements and not growth. Not sure about UAL but I heard from a buddy at DAL that someone hired now in the early 40s wouldn't break 3500-4000 at DAL which is nuts.
|
It's all a crap shoot and no one knows what any of the airlines will look like fleet wise etc when we are all near retirement. I did what everyone before me told me to do... take the first phone call and then stay at the airline that has a domicile where you plan to live. AA was that one for me. I've been happy. Obviously, if we get more WBs which we will because Boeing owes us more and when a next gen airplane like the Boeing NMA comes or the 321XLR with some fun translant flying, I'm sure WB CA might go more junior.
|
Originally Posted by J3nkums
(Post 3443429)
Our current retirement projections for someone getting hired here at 40+ is still much better than DAL. At least in regards to hiring for retirements and not growth. Not sure about UAL but I heard from a buddy at DAL that someone hired now in the early 40s wouldn't break 3500-4000 at DAL which is nuts.
|
Originally Posted by J3nkums
(Post 3443429)
Our current retirement projections for someone getting hired here at 40+ is still much better than DAL. At least in regards to hiring for retirements and not growth. Not sure about UAL but I heard from a buddy at DAL that someone hired now in the early 40s wouldn't break 3500-4000 at DAL which is nuts.
someone hired today at DL will be roughly (based on the first day of the year) 10 years (2032) -9100 15 years (2037) -7200 20 years (2042) -5600 25 years (2047) -3500 30 years (2052) -1450 35 years (2057) -430 40 years (2062) -20 youngest pilot at DL retires in 2063 |
Originally Posted by BcULstDaBlodyWr
(Post 3443390)
What about age 27?
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3443575)
yep. I posted these numbers in a DL thread,
someone hired today at DL will be roughly (based on the first day of the year) 10 years (2032) -9100 15 years (2037) -7200 20 years (2042) -5600 25 years (2047) -3500 30 years (2052) -1450 35 years (2057) -430 40 years (2062) -20 youngest pilot at DL retires in 2063 |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3443577)
Sub 250. Most likely sub 2500 the last 10-12 yrs all thing being equal
At 27 you’d be top 100 and top ~2500 for the last 17ish years |
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3444158)
well nice. that should mean I get awarded 78 on this vacancy bid. But I highly doubt this is true. |
Originally Posted by JJDriver
(Post 3444011)
When I ran the Widget calculator someone in their early 40’s would likely top out a slightly above mid level 717 Capt or slight below mid level 737 Capt. 3,500 sounded about right, going maybe 2/3 up the current list.
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3444158)
|
Originally Posted by Scar09
(Post 3444188)
well nice. that should mean I get awarded 78 on this vacancy bid. But I highly doubt this is true.
|
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3444256)
This has to be assuming we receive all 40ish 787s on order in a relatively short amount of time. If not, this is not close to true other than NB CA which is probably pretty close.
yep totally agree. But I’ll still keep it in my bids. But maybe Isom is getting all the 78’s and a new contract. Just have to make it through summer first right? Haha |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3444253)
do you believe that Al? 10 years to WB CA? A newhire would need appx 11,000 pilots to retire to hold a WB CA position. Do we have 11k retirements in 10 years? That also assumes we don’t park the 777 fleet over the next decade. I think 20-25 years is best case scenario.
|
Here's the problem with all these seniority calculators that people don't understand. They're dumb technology. They only account for age of pilots and current fleet number as of the day they are used. Sure at the standard lapse rate of pilots making it to 65 and the current fleet, someone in their 40s may only make it to 3500-4500 on a list of 14000-ish (top 25%), but what if I told you that by the time they get there there will be over 20,000 pilots on that list (top 15%) and hundreds more aircraft than today? Also many pilots aren't going to make it to mandatory retirement age whatever that ends up being, none of which is accounted for.
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3444253)
do you believe that Al? 10 years to WB CA? A newhire would need appx 11,000 pilots to retire to hold a WB CA position. Do we have 11k retirements in 10 years? That also assumes we don’t park the 777 fleet over the next decade. I think 20-25 years is best case scenario.
For a 2014 hire 15 years Oct 2021 hire 17 years May 2022 hire 20 years (we hired a **** ton between the former and latter) Maybe I’m wrong, I actually expected the number to drop for 2021 hires below that of 2014 hires. Obviously if we actually get more widebodies that would change all of this, also bidding behavior could change this as well as we have a ton of senior WB FO’s, not sure if the younger generation will bid like that or not. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3444253)
do you believe that Al? 10 years to WB CA? A newhire would need appx 11,000 pilots to retire to hold a WB CA position. Do we have 11k retirements in 10 years? That also assumes we don’t park the 777 fleet over the next decade. I think 20-25 years is best case scenario.
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3444317)
Here's the problem with all these seniority calculators that people don't understand. They're dumb technology. They only account for age of pilots and current fleet number as of the day they are used. Sure at the standard lapse rate of pilots making it to 65 and the current fleet, someone in their 40s may only make it to 3500-4500 on a list of 14000-ish (top 25%), but what if I told you that by the time they get there there will be over 20,000 pilots on that list (top 15%) and hundreds more aircraft than today? Also many pilots aren't going to make it to mandatory retirement age whatever that ends up being, none of which is accounted for.
|
Why would anyone think a calculator would be able to hyper-accurately predict the future by accounting for unknown variables….?
|
Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
(Post 3444660)
Why would anyone think a calculator would be able to hyper-accurately predict the future by accounting for unknown variables….?
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3444802)
That's what I'd like to know. Because I keep reading "Don't go to ABC air line because you'll only retire at Y,YYY but at XYZ airline you'll retire at X,XXX. You may as well buy a lotto ticket. The legacies are basically the same once you get behind the door. Go to the one that has a base where you want to live and be done with it. Trying to game the system to get a few numbers ahead is a waste of time. Take it from someone who is nearing the end of his career and endured the brunt of the Lost Decade. Your career won't turn out as you expected. Take what you can get.
|
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3444825)
How many people younger than you is the important part and really the only relevant metric. The part that is worthless is "I can hold CA on XXX aircraft in XXXX". Too many outside variables will change that. However one thing that will never change is the amount of people hired before you that are younger than you.
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3444827)
That's true. Which is why everyone hired in their 40s and later need to temper their expectations. It's unlikely they will ever see WB CA. Too many younger people ahead of them. But that's okay. They can still make NB CA in just a few years and make way more than wherever they came from (LCC/regional).
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3444802)
The legacies are basically the same once you get behind the door.
That might have been the case 30 years ago, definitely not today. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3444836)
That might have been the case 30 years ago, definitely not today.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands