![]() |
Originally Posted by FLYMIA
(Post 3670736)
No one is starting a jump seat war over non sense. Take a break from the Internet my god..
Better to just call it "non sense" and change the subject, right? |
Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
(Post 3670752)
If AA pilots thought about it, they'd realize they're about to freeload off of other pilot groups' efforts and success...again...by failing to pattern bargain.
Better to just call it "nonsense" and change the subject, right? |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670756)
Yeah the amazing efforts when UAL put forth the Tumi TA, only to be saved by AA management of all people. Get real dummy. And whens the JS war starting? I’m waiting on your que.
UAL pilots were ****ed well before AA management stepped in to “save us.” Tumi was going to fail, AA management just pushed it to a 94% failure. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3670722)
Kick APA to the curb and start the process of becoming industry-leading again.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3670722)
I know you don’t care for DALPA and you certainly have your reasons. And I don’t think ALPA is some magical savior for the AA pilot group. But the problems we have with ALPA at both Delta and United quite frankly pale in comparison to the absolute asshattery that occurs within APA. Change starts with the pilots overwhelmingly rejecting the clowns at APA and sending them packing in the clown car they showed up in.
Look at United… They’re a prime example of a labor organization in upheaval when their former Chairman Insler was ousted and they started cleaning house. And despite the chaos over there they STILL managed to blow the doors off with an awesome contract. How can anyone at AA look within your own labor organization and see anything redeeming? Kick APA to the curb and start the process of becoming industry-leading again. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670718)
How’s FSB going? Fun times commuting in to base to sit at the airport for 4-5 hours eh?
And here he goes again. UPA23 - Page 6 NEW - Long sit Add Pay Lineholder no longer involuntarily assigned FSB after loss of flying UPA23 - Page 7 NEW - 3 hours of Add Pay for Loss of flying when Pilot agrees to sit Voluntary Field Standby (Pilot must concur first) UPA23 - Page 13 NEW - No mandatory Field Standby assignments; Voluntary Field Standby pays 3 hours of Add Pay UPA23 - Page 15 First day of reserve pre-10am incentives •Pilot who picks up SC or FSB entitled to 1 hour of Add Pay UPA23 - Page 44 NEW - Lineholder can no longer involuntarily assigned FSB after loss of flying It appears FSB is going amazingly well. But you have already been explained this what, ten times now? And before you pretend that your reference was solely directed at their present contract, allow me put it in your own words:
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670641)
Posting data from old contracts. We all know this. I’m obviously taking about going forward. I think it’s time for you to calm down moron.
|
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670798)
Hey sh$T for brains, he’s referencing our current ability to trip trade, so I reference his current FSB. Try to keep up dummy.
You’re a little worm He is alluding to the near lack of existence of trip trading at AA, and our failure to secure provisions to fix it. His response was given in reaction to your sarcastic remark about United not eliminating their global reserve system. Little worm out. 🐛 |
Originally Posted by Montcalm
(Post 3670811)
He is alluding to the near lack of existence of trip trading at AA, and our failure to secure provisions to fix it.
His response was given in reaction to your sarcastic remark about United not eliminating their global reserve system. Little worm out. 🐛 |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670390)
No. We left out crap like global reserve and kept stuff that we have that neither DAL or UAL have.
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3670655)
So how's that trip trading going?? Oh wait, your schedules have been locked down for 18 months.
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670718)
How’s FSB going? Fun times commuting in to base to sit at the airport for 4-5 hours eh?
Meep meep. 🐛 |
Originally Posted by Montcalm
(Post 3670817)
The predicament with the internet is that it tends to leave a trace.
Meep meep. 🐛 You’re steadily moving from the 🐛 category to 🐈 |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670820)
Yep that’s how awful their current contract is. They currently have global reserve and FSB. They’re making one of those voluntary when the new contract passes. Right now they’re still living with both, as we are with the trip trading system.
It was the point from the outset, but you feign to not understand when caught.
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670820)
You’re steadily moving from the 🐛 category to 🐈
|
Originally Posted by Montcalm
(Post 3670825)
Except they are fixing their "awful" (FSB). We aren’t fixing ours (trip trading, or lack thereof).
It was the point from the outset, but you feign to not understand when caught. Such grandiosity, calling me a 🐈 while hiding behind the veil of an anonymous message board. Truly pathetic. And you’re real brave, calling me a management monkey, tough guy. Let’s remember who started the name calling behind the veil of a message board. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670828)
The trip trading system is meant to get addressed by creating less 4+5 day trips. Also the latest email from APA mentions TTS directly.
And you’re real brave, calling me a management monkey, tough guy. Let’s remember who started the name calling behind the veil of a message board. |
Originally Posted by Flyinggrill
(Post 3670371)
Pretty sure we weren’t riding coattails when the Tumi TA came out…
|
Originally Posted by nochopforboxes
(Post 3670857)
At least the Tumi TA was overwhelmingly voted down. I would not be the least bit surprised if this gets voted in.
|
Originally Posted by nochopforboxes
(Post 3670857)
At least the Tumi TA was overwhelmingly voted down. I would not be the least bit surprised if this gets voted in.
|
Ta canceled
|
Originally Posted by icecreamfanatic
(Post 3670964)
Ta canceled
|
Originally Posted by Supermoto
(Post 3671034)
Now that is disgusting. Withhold a TA that will surely overwhelmingly pass so the 10% crybabies can feel tough. If Isom's deal was so bad let it get voted down.
|
Originally Posted by Supermoto
(Post 3671034)
Now that is disgusting. Withhold a TA that will surely overwhelmingly pass so the 10% crybabies can feel tough. If Isom's deal was so bad let it get voted down.
|
Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
(Post 3671049)
or….. you know…. Actually keep negotiating since he was the one that reopened the deal and added sweeteners… not us
We could keep negotiating until the very last person is satisfied, but the system is set up to only negotiate until 50%+1 are satisfied. There is a place in our career field for those who want to do solo negotiating and that is the top of the corporate pilot world. You can be a free agent and fly for Taylor Swift or some king in the middle east and negotiate your own ludicrous contract if you are such a bad-ass pilot. It is disgusting to withhold a TA from the pilot group that would overwhelmingly be approved so you can get some stupid addition so you feel cool like a Delta pilot. |
Originally Posted by Supermoto
(Post 3671053)
Are you suggesting it won't pass as is? There is risk in negotiating further and everyone that would vote yes understands that further negotiating COULD result in a better contract. It is a valid position to keep negotiating, it all comes down to your appetite for risk (or your understanding of macroeconomics).
We could keep negotiating until the very last person is satisfied, but the system is set up to only negotiate until 50%+1 are satisfied. There is a place in our career field for those who want to do solo negotiating and that is the top of the corporate pilot world. You can be a free agent and fly for Taylor Swift or some king in the middle east and negotiate your own ludicrous contract if you are such a bad-ass pilot. It is disgusting to withhold a TA from the pilot group that would overwhelmingly be approved so you can get some stupid addition so you feel cool like a Delta pilot. What is the risk in negotiating further? Your money is always going to be there. The bar has been set in that regard. We will now trail in most other sections that aren't LTD. Reserve, where we carry a higher percentage than every other carrier about 1/3 of the entire group, is about to take a nose dive with the new assignment system paired with ECS and codified ability to be reassigned into a day off. Our current reserve system is the best out there. Why are we moving backwards? The board is protecting you from yourself at this point. Your desired payday will come. It might even come this week. Relax and let the process play out. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3670815)
Again stupid, your little worm like selective comprehension has got you babbling about much of nothing. Their global reserve and current FSB are not the same thing. Bye bye you pathetic a little worm.
|
Originally Posted by Supermoto
(Post 3671034)
Now that is disgusting. Withhold a TA that will surely overwhelmingly pass so the 10% crybabies can feel tough. If Isom's deal was so bad let it get voted down.
But the deal is fine because Roberts sweeteners are the fallback position, his only option is too say it’s a standing offer and the pay is already captured. His only position can be that if they wanna bark up the tree for 3 more months until they’re fatigued that’s up to them. He can’t afford to try and escalate the urgency of voting this in now, or play hardball by reneging on what he already posted a video of. He has to let the union take free shots because he already rushed out and offered back pay to Jan 1, could be a tactical miss on his part because that could have been his closer and would have left a small about of urgency to close on a deal. He may give them something to claim a W and close now. This is what happens when you don’t negotiate QOL gains and do negotiate back pay, we are entering a closed loop where it cost nothing to stay in it and get nothing to exit. |
Originally Posted by icecreamfanatic
(Post 3670964)
Ta canceled
Some think the TA, absent the sweeteners, has to go out for a vote tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671084)
Is it?
Some think the TA, absent the sweeteners, has to go out for a vote tomorrow. I believe this line says it’s not going out for a vote tomorrow |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671084)
Is it?
Some think the TA, absent the sweeteners, has to go out for a vote tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
(Post 3671088)
we aren’t ALPA. Our board can pull the vote. (Supposedly)
|
Originally Posted by pilot28042
(Post 3671086)
“. Recognizing that the current TA is not ratifiable, American Airlines reopened negotiations, and we will continue those negotiations as mandated by the Railway Labor Act and common sense. ”
I believe this line says it’s not going out for a vote tomorrow |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671095)
Not according to one very smart, connected pilot I consulted. Shouldn't that be 100% clear today?
|
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3671065)
Your desired payday will come. It might even come this week. Relax and let the process play out.
It’s interesting how the different camps seem to align along generational lines/time remaining before retirement. |
Originally Posted by thrust
(Post 3671099)
This.
It’s interesting how the different camps seem to align along generational lines/time remaining before retirement. Sigh… I’ve even heard that exact comment. |
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3671098)
At this point all the "connected" pilots have an agenda and cannot be trusted.
Paint with a broad brush much? Not this guy. I have asked my reps and officers-no answer. |
Originally Posted by icecreamfanatic
(Post 3670964)
Ta canceled
|
Originally Posted by Supermoto
(Post 3671034)
Now that is disgusting. Withhold a TA that will surely overwhelmingly pass so the 10% crybabies can feel tough. If Isom's deal was so bad let it get voted down.
|
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671172)
Paint with a broad brush much? Not this guy.
I have asked my reps and officers-no answer. |
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3671180)
I stand by what I said. The shenanigan level right now is through the roof.
Okay. Did you know that the BOD is meeting at 13:00 central to discuss the question. I will agree that the shenanigan level is through the roof, but I'm thinking that it's not from who you think it is. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3671178)
What's the Swahilian phrase for "I was right"?
I'm not sure, but you might want to hang on. I've heard that Swahili crow is tough to swallow. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671182)
Okay. Did you know that the BOD is meeting at 13:00 central to discuss the question.
I will agree that the shenanigan level is through the roof, but I'm thinking that it's not from who you think it is. |
Originally Posted by R57 relay
(Post 3671185)
I'm not sure, but you might want to hang on. I've heard that Swahili crow is tough to swallow.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands