![]() |
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places is struggles. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. JetBlue literally just started their plan and they just took out almost three billion in loans at ridiculously high rates. The jury is going to be out for a long time as to whether they are righting the ship. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax.
No way this isn’t a troll post. |
Originally Posted by Montcalm
(Post 3835384)
No way this isn’t a troll post.
AA is failing in all three of those cities and other hubs are being harmed as a result of the vein attempt to make those replaces work. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835370)
As long the paychecks keep coming who cares?
At this point it would do AA some good to use the retirements to realistically align the airline and bases that should be dehubbed like JFK, ord and lax. AA should play to it's strengths in dfw, dca, phl, Mia and phx and dump the places it struggles in. Jfk, lax and ord are money losing pits that do nothing but cannibalize resources that could be used for the more profitable hubs. Would also solve the issues of a/c deliveries. aa is not like delta or United, AA is more like the old USAir. A full service Lcc. JetBlue is doing the same thing and it's working. Dehubbing JFK, ORD and LAX is asinine. All we would be doing is giving up the few remaining high value customers we have to United and Delta. It's not all about Joe Sixpack in Philly who wants to fly to FLL a few times a year. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3835391)
JB is on the verge of following Spirit down the toilet. Just took out a high internet $3B loan to keep the place afloat. They're burning the furniture now. Not a good example of what to do.
Dehubbing JFK, ORD and LAX is asinine. All we would be doing is giving up the few remaining high value customers we have to United and Delta. It's not all about Joe Sixpack in Philly who wants to fly to FLL a few times a year. AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by Archiee
(Post 3835401)
They are cutting the unprofitable and sticking with what makes them money.
AA has already lost the "high value" customers. There is a reason why there is zero growth in JFK, lax and ord. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3835359)
No one is going to buy this much debt.
Originally Posted by CRJCapitan
(Post 3835364)
I think you just answered your own question. All three of these carriers are cyclical and it'll ebb and flow as to who is mediocre and who is really doing well.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands