![]() |
American loses 4 gates to United at ORD.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV. |
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3903376)
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV. |
Originally Posted by Scar09
(Post 3903383)
I think those gates were ran by Air Wisconsin. I could be wrong though.
This podcast explains the gate assignment system at ORD. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1bf...RrCO1Z7zaTdnwg |
Starting to understand why they added so much on ORD. It was an attempt to squat the slots.
|
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology. |
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3903376)
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
|
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3903395)
Starting to understand why they added so much on ORD. It was an attempt to squat the slots.
|
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 3903419)
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology. It's going to come down to actual utilization of the gates you do have, possibly/likely modified for whatever their market goals are, such as regional feed, more Europe, more west coast, whatever they think benefits the city's economy. Of possibly just whatever brings in the most direct revenue to the airport authority... if they're not properly managed by the local political leaders, airports will naturally drift to prioritize the benefit of the organization itself, vice the city or citizens. |
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 3903419)
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology. So no, a snowball effect is not likely here. |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3903467)
This is not how it works. For example, let's say AA has 30 gates and 25 flights. AA loses 5 gates because the gate:flight ratio required is 1:1. Now AA has 25 gates and 25 flights, no further reductions occur.
So no, a snowball effect is not likely here. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3903531)
but gate efficiency generally increases with more gates. it’s easier to shove 120 flights into 100 gates than it is to shove 12 flights into 10 gates in the same amount of time. flexibility…
|
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3903436)
Is this why they're using the airport construction as an excuse for slower growth?
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3903592)
I just went there a couple days ago and waited in the pad for 15 minutes with 5 other aircraft for a gate to open up. I guess our goal is to turn every hub experience into CLT.
|
Originally Posted by SunDevilPilot
(Post 3903628)
Have you not been through there the past two weeks? It’s a hot mess, even by ord standards.
|
I know he's just another travel blogger, but this guy did a lot of reaching out to the city and other airlines as part of the linked article. The long and the short of it seems to be that the "preferential" gate distribution between tenants gets rebalanced in October for usage based upon the prior year (they apparently start looking at it in Feb). So it makes sense why the recent summer schedule increases have been announced at American.
His take: "What DOES matter is that this is all a silly shell game anyway. Remember, the gates don’t change over until October 1, so United will only get to use those six gates for the last three months of the year. But when the process starts all over again next February? It looks at departure share for all of the previous year. That means United will not have the benefit of those six gates for the first nine months of data which skews things greatly. That means it could very well lose again next year even if it is ramping up. And the cycle will continue since the data will never include more than a quarter of a year with the most recent gate allocation." United Says It Grabs Six More Gates at O’Hare, But It’s Not Entirely Clear – Cranky Flier |
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 3903385)
Not sure that is quite it.
This podcast explains the gate assignment system at ORD. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1bfEVCfB14qjQ8PwLa41oz?si=wylBywyXRrCO1Z7zaTdnwg |
AA took over the Spirit gates (we are already using them) and lost some Air Wisconsin gates. The end result are more of the larger gates for better mainline capacity. Travel bloggers are almost always wrong and look at the date of that podcast, it was produced before AA announced they were expanding service in ORD.
|
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903844)
That podcast is horrid and gets a lot of things wrong.
.... |
Originally Posted by HwkrPlt
(Post 3903850)
Such as?
.... |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903845)
AA took over the Spirit gates (we are already using them) and lost some Air Wisconsin gates. The end result are more of the larger gates for better mainline capacity. Travel bloggers are almost always wrong and look at the date of that podcast, it was produced before AA announced they were expanding service in ORD.
Chicago Chiefs came out and said it wasn't true. Either they lied or were lied to or didn't do research. Not good for the base. |
Originally Posted by Varks
(Post 3903858)
We lost 4 gates. Quick google search. It has to do with frontage. Net loss was 7 gates. AA 4. JetBlue 1, Air Canada, 1 and Spirit 1. I think those are the ones. United is turning that footage into 6 gates. They win. We lose. Kirby out smarts again. All revisited soon. And then gates will be juggled again.
Chicago Chiefs came out and said it wasn't true. Either they lied or were lied to or didn't do research. Not good for the base. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903852)
As I stated above came out before AA's announcement and that supposed ORD "expert" on that podcast is only an expert cause he lived in Chicago and "flys United a lot". lol, okay. That's one of the worst aviation podcasts out there.
....... |
Originally Posted by Varks
(Post 3903858)
We lost 4 gates. Quick google search. It has to do with frontage. Net loss was 7 gates. AA 4. JetBlue 1, Air Canada, 1 and Spirit 1. I think those are the ones. United is turning that footage into 6 gates. They win. We lose. Kirby out smarts again. All revisited soon. And then gates will be juggled again.
Chicago Chiefs came out and said it wasn't true. Either they lied or were lied to or didn't do research. Not good for the base. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903860)
Well if google says so. What does google tell you about the L3 through L10 gates where AA NB aircraft are now parked where Spirit used to park? We didn't lose any H and K gates, so what did they take? A few regional G gates where Air Wisconsin used to fly?
|
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903860)
Well if google says so. What does google tell you about the L3 through L10 gates where AA NB aircraft are now parked where Spirit used to park? We didn't lose any H and K gates, so what did they take? A few regional G gates where Air Wisconsin used to fly?
Do you deny we lost gates? |
Originally Posted by Varks
(Post 3903911)
So many articles from multiple sources. How old are you? Look for yourself. We lost gates. Deal with it.
Do you deny we lost gates? |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903927)
Because the news always get it right lol. ORD Chiefs says it was a net gain of gates and i can see with my own two eyes it was a net gain of gates. We gained all of Spirit's old L gates, which was 5 or 6 gates, and lost what, 2 G gates? We own all of H, K, and L now.
We are also picking up gates on the north side of the L gates. Not sure if those will be RJ or mainlines gates. Our charts show 3 gates, I’m thinking they will be RJ gates. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903927)
Because the news always get it right lol. ORD Chiefs says it was a net gain of gates and i can see with my own two eyes it was a net gain of gates. We gained all of Spirit's old L gates, which was 5 or 6 gates, and lost what, 2 G gates? We own all of H, K, and L now.
|
Originally Posted by Varks
(Post 3903911)
Do you deny we lost gates?
|
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903860)
Well if google says so. What does google tell you about the L3 through L10 gates where AA NB aircraft are now parked where Spirit used to park? We didn't lose any H and K gates, so what did they take? A few regional G gates where Air Wisconsin used to fly?
Unless we see United in H/K/L (doubt), the math ain't mathing for the "United wins AA loses again" crowd. |
Originally Posted by piranhawc
(Post 3903999)
Shhhh, now you're actually using knowledge of the airport layout vs Google results. Do YoUr OwN rEsEaRcH.
Unless we see United in H/K/L (doubt), the math ain't mathing for the "United wins AA loses again" crowd. |
Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
(Post 3903844)
That podcast is horrid and gets a lot of things wrong.
|
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3904004)
You left out G.
|
Here is an update.
On Friday, May 30, the CDA sent its airline partners the final gate layout for O’Hare International Airport as part of the 2025 gate reallocation process, triggered in January by United Airlines in accordance with the airport’s 2018 Airline Use and Lease Agreement (AULA).The final gate layout, available at FlyChicago.com, awards the following preferential-use gates to the following airlines: ·Air Canada: One gate at Concourse E ·Alaska Airlines: One gate at Concourse G ·American Airlines: 59 gates across Concourses G, H, K and L ·Delta Air Lines: Seven gates at Concourse M ·JetBlue: One gate at Concourse G ·Southwest Airlines: Three gates at Concourse M ·Spirit Airlines: Four gates at Concourse G ·United Airlines: 95 gates across Concourses B, C, E, F and G. https://www.flychicago.com/SiteColle...ibits_2025.pdf So IamSuss was wrong, AA did lose five gates. Half of G is no longer AA when the entire concourse used to be all AA. |
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3916318)
Here is an update.
On Friday, May 30, the CDA sent its airline partners the final gate layout for O’Hare International Airport as part of the 2025 gate reallocation process, triggered in January by United Airlines in accordance with the airport’s 2018 Airline Use and Lease Agreement (AULA).The final gate layout, available at FlyChicago.com, awards the following preferential-use gates to the following airlines: ·Air Canada: One gate at Concourse E ·Alaska Airlines: One gate at Concourse G ·American Airlines: 59 gates across Concourses G, H, K and L ·Delta Air Lines: Seven gates at Concourse M ·JetBlue: One gate at Concourse G ·Southwest Airlines: Three gates at Concourse M ·Spirit Airlines: Four gates at Concourse G ·United Airlines: 95 gates across Concourses B, C, E, F and G. https://www.flychicago.com/SiteColle...ibits_2025.pdf So IamSuss was wrong, AA did lose five gates. Half of G is no longer AA when the entire concourse used to be all AA. |
Originally Posted by LearPilot88
(Post 3916329)
Pending litigation
|
Great news for SkyWeezy and BlowJet..
|
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 3916345)
Great news for SkyWeezy and BlowJet..
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3916342)
Overseen by Chicago judges? Spoiler Alert: it won't be in favor of a Texas based corporation.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:47 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands