American loses 4 gates to United at ORD.
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 241
Likes: 18
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
#2
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 200
Likes: 12
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
#3
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 220
Likes: 53
Not sure that is quite it.
This podcast explains the gate assignment system at ORD.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1bf...RrCO1Z7zaTdnwg
This podcast explains the gate assignment system at ORD.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1bf...RrCO1Z7zaTdnwg
#5
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
#6
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 185
From: 787 FO
Any chance of cutting/pasting article as it is behind a pay wall?
#8
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,104
Likes: 791
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
It's going to come down to actual utilization of the gates you do have, possibly/likely modified for whatever their market goals are, such as regional feed, more Europe, more west coast, whatever they think benefits the city's economy. Of possibly just whatever brings in the most direct revenue to the airport authority... if they're not properly managed by the local political leaders, airports will naturally drift to prioritize the benefit of the organization itself, vice the city or citizens.
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 446
Likes: 147
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
So no, a snowball effect is not likely here.
#10
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
but gate efficiency generally increases with more gates. it’s easier to shove 120 flights into 100 gates than it is to shove 12 flights into 10 gates in the same amount of time. flexibility…
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



