Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
American loses 4 gates to United at ORD. >

American loses 4 gates to United at ORD.


Notices

American loses 4 gates to United at ORD.

Old 04-11-2025 | 08:43 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 241
Likes: 18
Default American loses 4 gates to United at ORD.

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans

Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 08:57 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 200
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/airl...cuts-americans

Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
I think those gates were ran by Air Wisconsin. I could be wrong though.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 220
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Scar09
I think those gates were ran by Air Wisconsin. I could be wrong though.
Not sure that is quite it.

This podcast explains the gate assignment system at ORD.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1bf...RrCO1Z7zaTdnwg
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 09:13 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 241
Likes: 18
Default

Starting to understand why they added so much on ORD. It was an attempt to squat the slots.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
khergan's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 688
Likes: 236
Default

Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.

Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 10:08 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 185
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
Did they forget about these gates or something like those slots in JFK? Either way it's another failure by the usual suspects in charge. They claim they are going to fight this but they tried to fight the NEalliance and lost as well as the Latam JV.
Any chance of cutting/pasting article as it is behind a pay wall?
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 10:14 AM
  #7  
cornerpocket's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 594
Likes: 73
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
Starting to understand why they added so much on ORD. It was an attempt to squat the slots.
Is this why they're using the airport construction as an excuse for slower growth?
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,104
Likes: 791
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.

Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
They can't be that dumb, even in that city. Pretty soon no airlines would have any gates.

It's going to come down to actual utilization of the gates you do have, possibly/likely modified for whatever their market goals are, such as regional feed, more Europe, more west coast, whatever they think benefits the city's economy. Of possibly just whatever brings in the most direct revenue to the airport authority... if they're not properly managed by the local political leaders, airports will naturally drift to prioritize the benefit of the organization itself, vice the city or citizens.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 10:52 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 446
Likes: 147
Default

Originally Posted by khergan
Maybe this is my ignorance or misunderstanding of the ORD gate distribution, but this seems to me like something that will accelerate. It seems like that if more usage = more gates, then losing gates will create less usage, which means AA will lose more gates, which will result in less usage, etc.

Could this become a snowball effect? Maybe I'm just misreading their methodology.
This is not how it works. For example, let's say AA has 30 gates and 25 flights. AA loses 5 gates because the gate:flight ratio required is 1:1. Now AA has 25 gates and 25 flights, no further reductions occur.

So no, a snowball effect is not likely here.
Reply
Old 04-11-2025 | 12:59 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by WiFly
This is not how it works. For example, let's say AA has 30 gates and 25 flights. AA loses 5 gates because the gate:flight ratio required is 1:1. Now AA has 25 gates and 25 flights, no further reductions occur.

So no, a snowball effect is not likely here.
but gate efficiency generally increases with more gates. it’s easier to shove 120 flights into 100 gates than it is to shove 12 flights into 10 gates in the same amount of time. flexibility…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerryleber
United
98
10-04-2025 05:17 PM
sleeves
United
1477
10-20-2019 06:07 AM
Al Czervik
Delta
108
10-20-2019 04:42 AM
T Dawg
United
9
09-19-2010 08:25 AM
withthatsaid182
Regional
12
04-01-2010 06:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices