![]() |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4021321)
Idk if the company would want to pay per diem, accommodations, transportation, and another daily min just to avoid paying 1-2 hours extra for the CAs and FOs. At UA, the company migrated to 2-3 day pairing length to maintain the integrity of the operation, not to avoid long duty days. Just a data point here is all
2-3 day trips were a result of summer weather causing operational integrity issues, not duty day or rig pay. |
Isn't it neat? It's almost like a majority of the pilot group wants APA to do something about this, but "they need more data" aka more input from management about what's best for the company.
|
Originally Posted by Werjower
(Post 4021325)
Isn't it neat? It's almost like a majority of the pilot group wants APA to do something about this, but "they need more data" aka more input from management about what's best for the company.
|
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 4021230)
Same at Delta.
|
Originally Posted by AAdvocate
(Post 4021383)
Our Union says it made your trips markedly worse there. Is that true?
Also I don't see the logic in how a provision designed to make trips better made them...worse? How's that supposed to work again? |
Originally Posted by ohaiyo
(Post 4021423)
Also I don't see the logic in how a provision designed to make trips better made them...worse? How's that supposed to work again?
Hell, one of our "lauded" scheduling gurus argues against percentage vacancy bidding. |
Originally Posted by 8802
(Post 4021435)
Because we have a union that teaches a masterclass in unintended consequences every time they put pen to paper. We copy off the kid getting A's and B's, but still manage a D average.
Hell, one of our "lauded" scheduling gurus argues against percentage vacancy bidding. |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 4021374)
That exactly what they are looking at. If it doesn't exclusively help the top 10% or management then we won't get it
|
Originally Posted by 8802
(Post 4021435)
Because we have a union that teaches a masterclass in unintended consequences every time they put pen to paper. We copy off the kid getting A's and B's, but still manage a D average.
Hell, one of our "lauded" scheduling gurus argues against percentage vacancy bidding. Now that aggressive pick up is implemented the top line negotiating will be to get rid of it. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 4021480)
I don’t know if the top 10% get any special treatment from APA. The whole trips blocked for OE debacle on the WB has screwed the DFW 787/777 pilots for years. You could be top 1% seniority and not be able to hold the best trips during a particular month because nearly all of them are blocked for OE. Then if they decide they don’t need a trip they dump it into open time and it gets covered by a relatively junior reserve.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands