Search

Notices
View Poll Results: What will be the announcement?
New airplane order
58.33%
Pay bonus
4.17%
New routes
16.67%
New logo
12.50%
A1 passes
8.33%
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll

Huge AAnnouncement.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2026 | 01:20 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 580
Likes: 152
Default

Originally Posted by Lou Stool
What's the problem with this? We get to reserve the jumpseat on mainline flights. The three WOs can't reserve the jumpseat, so this is their equivalent, if you want to call it that.
Own metal rules is industry standard and more than fair.

AA pilot gets dibs on mainline JS. Reservable JS or if it went by seniority, no matter how it is handled here at AA, AA pilot gets it. AA pilot could just be a normal D2 pass( not D1W/D2W) with an Envoy pilot listed as a D1 pass, if only the JS is left, AA pilot on D2 gets it.

Envoy should get dibs on Envoy metal.

PSA gets dibs on PSA flight.

Piedmont gets dibs on Piedmont.

But PSA having dibs on Envoy is not an equivalent to our bookable JS because we get our own JS no matter how the JS on mainline is handled.

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Man, that’s unfortunate. I hope you guys get language that favors including jumpseaters in the BOW.

Flight deck and cabin JS are included in the BOW which is a game changer for a ton of commuters. Can you guys occupy a cabin JS if no FAs list for it?
No the FA's don't want to agree to allow us to occupy any empty cabin JS since they can't occupy the Flight Deck JS.
Reply
Old 04-16-2026 | 04:23 PM
  #102  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 161
Default

Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
What’s unfortunate is showing up to the airport not knowing if you’re getting the JS until 15 mins prior to departure. All the extra planning and stress and wasted time at the airport sucks. I hope we get language that favors BOW including jumpseaters but it is extremely rare to have a JS removed from the flight deck, especially with a large Airbus fleet, and it would not be a “game changer”. It should be a very low priority in the next contract negotiations.
It is unfortunate, but I’d say it’s as rare as yall getting off for W&B. I believe you mentioned that you drive to work a while ago. For you, it wouldn’t be game changing, but it is for commuters.
Reply
Old 04-16-2026 | 04:25 PM
  #103  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 161
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
Own metal rules is industry standard and more than fair.

AA pilot gets dibs on mainline JS. Reservable JS or if it went by seniority, no matter how it is handled here at AA, AA pilot gets it. AA pilot could just be a normal D2 pass( not D1W/D2W) with an Envoy pilot listed as a D1 pass, if only the JS is left, AA pilot on D2 gets it.

Envoy should get dibs on Envoy metal.

PSA gets dibs on PSA flight.

Piedmont gets dibs on Piedmont.

But PSA having dibs on Envoy is not an equivalent to our bookable JS because we get our own JS no matter how the JS on mainline is handled.



No the FA's don't want to agree to allow us to occupy any empty cabin JS since they can't occupy the Flight Deck JS.
Ahh. Seems like JB is the only one that gives pilots the cabin JS (maybe DL too?).
Reply
Old 04-16-2026 | 05:58 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 291
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
We have a mechanism where we can use taxi fuel to account for a jumpseater to get them on, but if an FA checked in first, they get the cabin JS and flight deck JS gets left behind. APA grieved it, but arbitrator made a stupid ruling despite the fact the section of the contract was, " Fuel burn for flight deck jumpseat", but the language in the section itself didn't reference only the flight deck jumpseat.

APA got burned by language again and another item that pits pilots and FA's against each other. Not sure how many CA's will utilize this mechanism if they realize the FA will get the FA JS and the Flight deck JS gets left behind......

It's nice that you guys got the JS's included into the BOW. We need to do the same.
I don't even know how to use that clause in the contract legally (per FARs) tbh. I've never had an issue, just get an enroute burn from dispatch. Never left any nonrev behind.
Reply
Old 04-16-2026 | 08:20 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 465
Likes: 56
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Ahh. Seems like JB is the only one that gives pilots the cabin JS (maybe DL too?).
APFA(the AA FA union) actively tells new hire FAs that it’s us…the pilots…that are excluding them from the cockpit JS. It’s DEFINITELY not the FAA! They refuse to consider pilots using FA JS until they are allowed to use cockpit JS.

They also tell the new hire FAs to refuse to allow any cockpit JSer if cabin JSers don’t get on as well. I’ve had a few of the brand, brand new FAs tell us that and push back when all JSers can’t be accommodated on weight restricted flights. It seems they’re being told that “if you don’t agree with it, it can’t happen”…

Management loves the division.
Reply
Old 04-17-2026 | 02:27 AM
  #106  
Beech Dude's Avatar
SrFOorJrCAisthe?
5 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 243
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
APFA(the AA FA union) actively tells new hire FAs that it’s us…the pilots…that are excluding them from the cockpit JS. It’s DEFINITELY not the FAA! They refuse to consider pilots using FA JS until they are allowed to use cockpit JS.

They also tell the new hire FAs to refuse to allow any cockpit JSer if cabin JSers don’t get on as well. I’ve had a few of the brand, brand new FAs tell us that and push back when all JSers can’t be accommodated on weight restricted flights. It seems they’re being told that “if you don’t agree with it, it can’t happen”…

Management loves the division.
Sound Off to your reps. The company is training incorrectly and contrary to FARs, FOM, and CBAs? Um, thats a big no no.
Reply
Old 04-17-2026 | 03:45 PM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 62
Default

I’m sure I’m misreading this, but are you saying that they are telling new hire FA’s that they determine if a pilot get in the cockpit JUMPSEAT or not?



Originally Posted by HPIC
APFA(the AA FA union) actively tells new hire FAs that it’s us…the pilots…that are excluding them from the cockpit JS. It’s DEFINITELY not the FAA! They refuse to consider pilots using FA JS until they are allowed to use cockpit JS.

They also tell the new hire FAs to refuse to allow any cockpit JSer if cabin JSers don’t get on as well. I’ve had a few of the brand, brand new FAs tell us that and push back when all JSers can’t be accommodated on weight restricted flights. It seems they’re being told that “if you don’t agree with it, it can’t happen”…

Management loves the division.
Reply
Old 04-17-2026 | 04:44 PM
  #108  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 161
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
APFA(the AA FA union) actively tells new hire FAs that it’s us…the pilots…that are excluding them from the cockpit JS. It’s DEFINITELY not the FAA! They refuse to consider pilots using FA JS until they are allowed to use cockpit JS.

They also tell the new hire FAs to refuse to allow any cockpit JSer if cabin JSers don’t get on as well. I’ve had a few of the brand, brand new FAs tell us that and push back when all JSers can’t be accommodated on weight restricted flights. It seems they’re being told that “if you don’t agree with it, it can’t happen”…

Management loves the division.
That is absolutely absurd. I would’ve quickly gotten the union involved
Reply
Old 04-18-2026 | 05:50 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 214
Likes: 45
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
APFA(the AA FA union) actively tells new hire FAs that it’s us…the pilots…that are excluding them from the cockpit JS. It’s DEFINITELY not the FAA! They refuse to consider pilots using FA JS until they are allowed to use cockpit JS.

They also tell the new hire FAs to refuse to allow any cockpit JSer if cabin JSers don’t get on as well. I’ve had a few of the brand, brand new FAs tell us that and push back when all JSers can’t be accommodated on weight restricted flights. It seems they’re being told that “if you don’t agree with it, it can’t happen”…

Management loves the division.
Some CAs need to grow some balls and make it known who is in charge.
Reply
Old 04-18-2026 | 07:40 AM
  #110  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 275
Default

Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
Some CAs need to grow some balls and make it known who is in charge.
That’s the main point; this isn’t the company allowing it, it’s CAs who allow the FAs to dictate the back of the plane. From the wheelchair closet, to seating. It’s not their plane, not their cabin.

Weak CA leadership seen by too many. FAs now think they decide when we have lav breaks and when we eat. The number of times I now see FAs call up with 45 minutes left in the flight with “you guys want to eat now?” Yeah no, and I’ll just claim meal reimbursement now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HSLD
Major
224
07-18-2007 11:24 AM
FDXFLYR
Cargo
43
04-09-2006 12:30 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
01-06-2006 09:56 PM
nick@FL350
Flight Schools and Training
24
11-08-2005 06:52 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-07-2005 02:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices