Ruling delayed, APA members to vote June 27
06-29-2012, 02:59 PM
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by swaayze
IMO the APA BOD did the most prudent thing in barely (9-7, manufactured I imagine - a nice vote of duty but no confidence) allowing the membership to determine their own fate (and getting 6 more weeks of status quo, btw). Let's face it, this is a sham bankruptcy designed to bust the unions and the company holds the best cards. If it wasn't sent out for a vote my money's that the terms would've been imposed today. It sucks but it is what it is. If it's voted down expect the judge to rule in the company's favor.
Originally Posted by swaayze
You might say the American pilots have a choice: **** sandwich (terms) or ss w/ cheese and condiments (TA).
....
06-30-2012, 07:12 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DFW A320 FO
Posts: 586
Originally Posted by eaglefly
They didn't do that at all.......
In reviewing the TA, I'd reverse those two.
In reviewing the TA, I'd reverse those two.
You really think the term sheet's better? Guess I need to pay more attention. Of course my view is from the outside w/ no emotion so obviously a different mindset.
06-30-2012, 07:36 AM
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by swaayze
Didn't do what? Manufacture the 9-7 vote or the most prudent thing (or both)?
Originally Posted by swaayze
You really think the term sheet's better? Guess I need to pay more attention. Of course my view is from the outside w/ no emotion so obviously a different mindset.
06-30-2012, 08:03 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Scope aside, I couldn't find language for pbs, and without it that is a reason to vote no. Pbs can be the pivotal item that affects quality of life. Should the company decide how it operates unilaterally, I would rather be furloughed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
