![]() |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1248894)
Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks.
Everybody can't be wrong. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1248898)
Well, I do agree with your assertion that everybody thinks ALPA sucks.
Everybody can't be wrong. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1248900)
Yeah, your life truly sucks compared to everybody else's, and it's all ALPA's fault. GMAFB
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1248894)
So you are saying that the attorneys that the independent union has hired are not very good? I mean, there is no conflict of interest, those lawyers aren't working for anybody else.. ostensibly... and (in your words) they bungled the case) Hmmmmm THAT is very interesting. How do you know that the next attorneys will be any better? Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks. Naaaaahh couldn't be THAT..
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1248894)
So you are saying that the attorneys that the independent union has hired are not very good? I mean, there is no conflict of interest, those lawyers aren't working for anybody else.. ostensibly... and (in your words) they bungled the case) Hmmmmm THAT is very interesting. How do you know that the next attorneys will be any better? Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks. Naaaaahh couldn't be THAT..
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1248908)
Given the massive leverage ALPA squandered, I'm not sure how we can pat ourselves on the back and be happy about it. Well, as long as you got yours. That's the important part. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by Ball Breaker
(Post 1248916)
Are these same ALPA attorneys representing ALPA against the TWA pilots? Oh, and how is that case going again?
I'm not the least bit concerned about that. Funny though how you totally dodged the question at hand. |
Originally Posted by aa73
(Post 1248914)
The firm that APA hired (Lazard) had one goal: to recommend the least-risk option to the membership, which was a Yes vote. They also would have gotten a lot more $$$ with a Yes vote.
|
I don't know the specifics as to why APA went with Lazard. They didn't call me to ask my opinion, and I'm even not qualified to give it.
All I know is that Lazard and the APA leadership tried to sell us a turd, and we waved the B.S. flag. Period. The TA was THE most concessionary piece of crap ever to hit the airline pilot profession, and frankly it was embarrassing to watch Lazard and APA's eyes glossing over it. So do we get a worse deal by voting down the TA? Dunno. What I *DO* know is that we refuse to live on our knees. If we're gonna get slammed with something worst than the TA, it won't be because we caved. Make no mistake, AMR, the UCC and Judge Lane absolutely dread not having a pilot contract in place. Therein lies our leverage, and we plan on taking full advantage of it. |
The advisors certainly don't inspire much confidence. The BOD had all this inside confidential info, yet barely half of them were convinced enough to vote to send it to the pilots. Additionally, the TA was devoid of most critical contract language and Lazard was recommending pilots pin the remainder of their careers on mostly bullet points..........ridiculous and absurd.
I understand Lazard has past and present relationships with some of the creditors including BOD positions, so many see too much incest. Bottom line is pilots need to take control of their futures and think for themselves for a change, instead of blindly accepting that told to them from entities and sources with conflicting interests. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands