Union members to vote on American deal
|
Again APA will send a list of "agreements in priciple" to the membership instead of a finalized contract. How many times will the AA pilots vote to accept a less than finished deal? Management has handed the APA and its pilots another promise not a contract. Will there be another vote to ratify the CONTRACT?
|
The contract language of the TA is posted on the APA web page.
|
To paraphrase APA leadership - "I believe we've played this hand out as much as it can be done." If this thing passes, we will forever wonder if that is truly the case.
I'm leaning towards a NO vote. I suspect the 13.5% stake is going to sucker people in. All I know at the moment is that our December bid sheet sucked, with a large number of lines at 16, 17, or more days on. As a first year FO in 1992, I was easily holding 12 day lines worth 78 hours. |
ForeverFO
What are your reasons for a no vote? |
I wasn't asked but,
50 % code share. Unlimited CS with Alaska (except LAX) Group 1 (E-190 CA) pay $108 hr. 4%/2%/2% raises? The 4% does not make up for loss of night pay. Regional feed to 65% of NB fleet count NB 2012 AA is 487 hulls NB fleet 2016 567 can exceed June 1 -Jan 1 at 110% that is regional count can be 110% Regional OTHER CS to 50% asm's E170 9/60 E 175 8/72 Ding Ding Ding pull 4 seats out. E-190 11/88 exceed 99 need extra FA UAL scope has UAX limit 900nm 76 seats max 255 hulls the >255 to 325 req no more than 102 70 seaters My A fund pension is frozen. My B-fund will be casshed out on a somewhat down market, most of it has been sold already. AA want to put 14 % into my 401K but UAL has 16.5% My union and many pilots will begin telling me that the only way to get rid of this management is to vote YES to this poor TA. I don't believe that. For all you non-AA pilots, our F/A's have a ME TOO clause. Persoanally NOT MY PROBLEM. Many pilots tired of NO pay protection will vote YES. Me i'm a NO! More later. |
The A fund being frozen and B fund being cashed out is a non issue. Those plans are finished as of the 1 Nov pay date.
The TA has a 14% contribution going into a 401k. That is an issue that you can vote on. |
Originally Posted by kcpunk
(Post 1294917)
ForeverFO
What are your reasons for a no vote? I think we can do better. I am also convinced that the "talks" that the company so eagerly desired last month was a sham, with no real desire to improve on the LBFO. |
These two are what could be the most serious, incurring many job-losses over time:
* 50 % code share. Unlimited CS with Alaska & Hawaiian (except LAX) * Regional feed to 65% of NB fleet count |
Hopefully the "NO" voters listened to the telecon yesterday.
A rejected TA puts the merger And Equity Stake at a huge risk Furlough protection to last active FO Scope and Code share agreements defended and explained well I have mouths to feed and a mortgage to pay, I think turning this TA down would be a huge mistake, I am a YES |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands