USAPA Board Approves MOU
01-19-2013, 06:30 AM
#382
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Originally Posted by GAPILOT36
Actually, if you read anything that USAPA put out recently or heard at the road show. It is 40MIL equally divided to 4000 pilots, NOT 5200. The other 1200 or so are on leave or will be off property. So if you do the math it's give or take 10,000.00. For the Probies. It may be prorated just like our profit sharing is.
01-19-2013, 09:37 AM
#383
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Originally Posted by Bringupthebird
There is also a history of not being trustworthy, hence his point.
01-19-2013, 10:41 AM
#384
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
75% (SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT RJ's!) Has everyone thought through this MOU?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time:
They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's. Scooter, Canadair and Embraier are salivating right now.
They are offering a terrible excuse for retro pay that is a huge insult. They are reducing min guarantee.
Who would any of us ever vote yes for that?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time:
They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's. Scooter, Canadair and Embraier are salivating right now.
They are offering a terrible excuse for retro pay that is a huge insult. They are reducing min guarantee.
Who would any of us ever vote yes for that?
Last edited by maruskipper; 01-19-2013 at 11:02 AM.
01-19-2013, 10:51 AM
#385
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,180
Originally Posted by maruskipper
Has everyone thought through this process?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time: They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's.
Who would ever vote yes for that?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time: They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's.
Who would ever vote yes for that?
01-19-2013, 10:52 AM
#386
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B-757/767 FO
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by maruskipper
Has everyone thought through this process?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time: They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's.
Who would ever vote yes for that?
They are proposing huge decreases in minimum fleet/block hours, etc. AND
They can outsource 75% of narrowbody flying to RJ's. Let me just say that one more time: They can outsource 75% of OUR flying to RJ's.
Who would ever vote yes for that?
Current mainline fleet count: 346
Current Express fleet count: 285
Current percentage: 82%
01-19-2013, 03:23 PM
#390
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 220
I would ask again if you can vote as a new hire. If you check the lists, it says that you are a member in good standing. I think you should have a letter from when you joined the union that says you're a member with rights that include the ability to vote. Union manual page 14 has more information.
But as usual, I can't say for sure. Hopefully someone else will chime in.
But as usual, I can't say for sure. Hopefully someone else will chime in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
