Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed >

Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed

Search
Notices

Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2013, 08:28 AM
  #1  
Working weekends
Thread Starter
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed

Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed | American Airlines bankruptcy | American Ai...

Directors of AMR Corp. have temporarily delayed a meeting to consider a merger between American Airlines and US Airways, The Associated Press reported Sunday, as the two sides continue to hammer out final details.

A source close to the matter told the AP that the AMR board, which had been expected to meet today, wants to meet in person, and that the US Airways board would only meet after the AMR board approves a deal. The source requested anonymity because the talks are private.

Last week, sources told the Star-Telegram that the AMR board was preparing to meet early this week to decide on the merger, with a decision to be announced sometime this week. Bloomberg News, which reported Friday that the AMR board would meet today, reported Sunday that an announcement would now come no earlier than midweek, according to people familiar with the matter.

The sources told the AP that negotiations are continuing on issues including the exact role that AMR CEO Tom Horton will play in the combined company. Discussions were centered on Horton being a nonexecutive chairman while US Airways management, led by CEO Doug Parker, would run the day-to-day operations of the new carrier.

Any deal would require approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. AMR has been operating in Chapter 11 bankruptcy since November 2011.

US Airways has been pushing for a merger since last spring, winning the support of American's unions and creditors. Meetings have been going on for weeks as the executives at both companies, along with American's unsecured creditors committee and an ad hoc bondholder group, have tried to reach a deal before the Feb. 15 expiration of a nondisclosure agreement with bondholders. While the nondisclosure agreement could be extended, bondholders have been pushing for a quick deal since the agreement restricts them from trading AMR or US Airways debt.

Read more here: Meeting of AMR board is temporarily delayed | American Airlines bankruptcy | American Ai...
Note: My opinion....If nothing happens all week, announcement-wise, then this agreement may have turned south.
satpak77 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 10:27 AM
  #2  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

It's just Horton being a crybaby and wanting to be CEO or an executive chairman. I really doubt anything will stop this merger train now.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 12:09 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

I was informed the delay is on the USAir side, there are two upper management officials whom refuse to let Tomahawk58 brown-nose them.
"I just think it's disgusting, his nose has been in many many AMR execs and I refuse to let him practice depth perception on me!" Ass-istant CP USAIR.
7576FO is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 12:38 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by 7576FO View Post
I was informed the delay is on the USAir side, there are two upper management officials whom refuse to let Tomahawk58 brown-nose them.
"I just think it's disgusting, his nose has been in many many AMR execs and I refuse to let him practice depth perception on me!" Ass-istant CP USAIR.
I appreciate your very kind words of encouragement. I've made no secret of the fact that I'm a diehard AAer. Loyalty for me isn't some notional idea. I respect the US folks for being just as loyal to their company! I respect Tom for taking on the hard work that probably should have taken place back in the 2003-2005 timeframe.

When the baton is passed to Doug as its expected too, I will be just as loyal to the combined entity known as American Airlines. It goes without saying that we'll "all" have our work cut out for us if we're to ascend to the head of the pack in the global airline industry.

I do appreciate the professionalism and diversity of opinion exhibited by the majority on this forum. For those that like to wallow in the mud and enjoy mudslinging, excuse me if I choose not to follow that path!

Best to "all" AAers now and in the new world soon to come.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 01:27 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,180
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
It's just Horton being a crybaby and wanting to be CEO or an executive chairman. I really doubt anything will stop this merger train now.
I said it on another thread. Tommy, you're done playing "airline". It's time to go home now.
EMBFlyer is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 01:40 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,485
Default

We were discussing this on our internal west webboard. Some made the argument that Horton deserved consideration because he has been, for the most part, an AMR guy his whole career versus Dug who took the nomad management route after he left AA.

The biggest reason, in my little opinion, is that Dug has 12 years as CEO. He kept AWA afloat after 9/11. He cleaned up a big mess at us Airways. He certainly has made mistakes but he has learned from them. LCC has made money for the past 3 years and last year was the best yet since the merger. The RASM for the start of this year was way above last years numbers.

So Dug has a good track record. Horton has had no real plan and made no secret of his plans to not grow AA mainline. This is not the time for Horton to start the learning curve of airline CEO. Actually running an airline, versus managing one out of CH11, requires skill and experience. It is better to go with the veteran starting pitcher versus the journeyman who spent a long time on the bench
cactusmike is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 01:50 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike View Post
We were discussing this on our internal west webboard. Some made the argument that Horton deserved consideration because he has been, for the most part, an AMR guy his whole career versus Dug who took the nomad management route after he left AA.

The biggest reason, in my little opinion, is that Dug has 12 years as CEO. He kept AWA afloat after 9/11. He cleaned up a big mess at us Airways. He certainly has made mistakes but he has learned from them. LCC has made money for the past 3 years and last year was the best yet since the merger. The RASM for the start of this year was way above last years numbers.

So Dug has a good track record. Horton has had no real plan and made no secret of his plans to not grow AA mainline. This is not the time for Horton to start the learning curve of airline CEO. Actually running an airline, versus managing one out of CH11, requires skill and experience. It is better to go with the veteran starting pitcher versus the journeyman who spent a long time on the bench
Your points are well taken. I think both guys are good at what they do. Clearly, they're both very competitive and want to succeed. One could make the argument that Mr. Parker was greatly assisted by the lowest costs among the big five and this the reason why US's numbers look good. That's all behind us now! The street and a lot of folks at both companies are betting that Doug's the guy to take the new American into the future. Much really will depend on the tenor of this forum as a proxy for how things will work out. To the extent that we can all come together and made the new American king of the airlines will be the test that shapes and determines our ultimate success.

I wish us all well!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 02:08 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,485
Default

The low cost factor definitely played a major role in being profitable. But that was more a factor at awa than lcc. I do not have the CASM comparisons handy and I'm too lazy right now to look them up but the post merger CASM doubled over the AWA costs to around 14.5 cents/ seat mile. I don't think that is a lot cheaper than everyone else. I am prepared to be corrected, though.

Being able to mesh the two airlines will be key. If past practice is followed look for most American policies and procedures to stay and for LCC people to have to adapt to them. Dug went out of his way to placate the East employees. It will be interesting to see if that is repeated.

One thing that I hope we will see is adoption of the AA 9 month AQP cycle versus our 12 month cycle. 12 months is too long between sim sessions. Another big decision will be checklist philosophy. We use flows and minimal checklists while I believe you guys still use read and do. At AWA we wee even more heavily set on flows with checklist just covering the stuff that will kill you. For instance, the 757 taxi check list used to be one item - Flaps: ___ set. Everything else had been done on the afterstart flow. The airbus is very well suited to flows, with the lights out philosophy. If its not lit, you're good to go.
cactusmike is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 05:12 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike View Post
The low cost factor definitely played a major role in being profitable. But that was more a factor at awa than lcc. I do not have the CASM comparisons handy and I'm too lazy right now to look them up but the post merger CASM doubled over the AWA costs to around 14.5 cents/ seat mile. I don't think that is a lot cheaper than everyone else. I am prepared to be corrected, though.

Being able to mesh the two airlines will be key. If past practice is followed look for most American policies and procedures to stay and for LCC people to have to adapt to them. Dug went out of his way to placate the East employees. It will be interesting to see if that is repeated.

One thing that I hope we will see is adoption of the AA 9 month AQP cycle versus our 12 month cycle. 12 months is too long between sim sessions. Another big decision will be checklist philosophy. We use flows and minimal checklists while I believe you guys still use read and do. At AWA we wee even more heavily set on flows with checklist just covering the stuff that will kill you. For instance, the 757 taxi check list used to be one item - Flaps: ___ set. Everything else had been done on the afterstart flow. The airbus is very well suited to flows, with the lights out philosophy. If its not lit, you're good to go.
Good points all around. I'm a big fan of the R9/R18 AQP training cycle. To your concern, it is easy to get a bit stale with a 12 month rotation. We've tried numerous ways over the years to streamline the checklist. I think we could clearly learn some new tricks and techniques from you all especially with respect to Airbus operations. I think you all will like the move to iPads for the EFB !

You know within the airline business, we all like to think our individual companies have a lock on how best to operate, so shaking things up isn't necessary a bad thing. I have to admit though, it's hard to do at times.

Looking to the future!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 02-11-2013, 07:48 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,485
Default

Yeah, iPads are great. I use Wing X Pro. I mean If I could officially use my iPad with the really cool flight planning app that has all my charts in one place and allows me to toggle between phases of flight with one touch. And touch-xpand the taxi chart at night or early in the am.

Just sayin'. Yes, I am looking forward, not back.
cactusmike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
Albief15
Cargo
46
01-18-2008 08:37 PM
Jack Bauer
Regional
100
10-27-2007 10:33 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
183
06-04-2007 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices