AOL update
05-08-2013 | 12:30 PM
#871
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
But...........those three parties have ulterior motives and their opinions really don't matter. Here is what the 9th said about it:
"[4] A question is fit for decision when it can be decided
without considering “contingent future events that may or
may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.”
The MOU is contingent on a merger. That merger could still come off the tracks. It would be stupid for USAPA not to argue this point.
"[4] A question is fit for decision when it can be decided
without considering “contingent future events that may or
may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.”
The MOU is contingent on a merger. That merger could still come off the tracks. It would be stupid for USAPA not to argue this point.
05-08-2013 | 01:27 PM
#872
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
So are you saying that she will write an order that says "If the merger closes.........."?
05-08-2013 | 01:42 PM
#873
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Whatever she decides will be contingent on merger closing. Well the never ending litigation is proof of how bad the 9th majority screwed up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
