Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
APA Protocol Agreement proposal >

APA Protocol Agreement proposal

Search
Notices

APA Protocol Agreement proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2014, 08:54 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Default APA Protocol Agreement proposal

It seems the APA has responded to USAPA...

https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...-Protocol.aspx

SENIORITY INTEGRATION PROTOCOL: APA proposed a seniority integration protocol agreement today to the US Airline Pilots Association that incorporates USAPA's suggestions and addresses concerns their leadership has expressed. As you will see, the four-party protocol will include American Airlines and US Airways management as signatories. We'll update you once USAPA has responded to our proposal.
algflyr is offline  
Old 06-18-2014, 10:18 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr View Post
It seems the APA has responded to USAPA...

https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...-Protocol.aspx

SENIORITY INTEGRATION PROTOCOL: APA proposed a seniority integration protocol agreement today to the US Airline Pilots Association that incorporates USAPA's suggestions and addresses concerns their leadership has expressed. As you will see, the four-party protocol will include American Airlines and US Airways management as signatories. We'll update you once USAPA has responded to our proposal.
The West Class should not implicitly assume an arbitrator would ignore a court order that found the West Class is not entitled to participate in MB SLI arbitration.

The West had a chance to negotiate at Wye River, at the 9th, at Judge Silver's DJ, and at the DFR trial on the merits. Every time they stuck with "Nic or Nothing" and got worse than nothing. They can call Garry and tell him they want to make a deal, or they can double down and get nothing, again.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 02:00 AM
  #3  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

The USAPA response will be a lawsuit.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:12 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 449
Default

Interestingly it seems as though APA is agreeing to have USAPA merger committee autonomous even after single carrier determination. The kicking point is paragraph 3.

Believe this is APA way of saying, ok if the west thinks it deserves it's own MC, then let's let it goto arbitration and let him decide. Sticking point I see is that there is a federal court ruling already answering that question.....So why let an arbitrator change that? Seems more along the lines of CYA by APA
crzipilot is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 04:47 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik View Post
The USAPA response will be a lawsuit.
We've won every single one.
FreighterGuyNow is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 05:17 AM
  #6  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow View Post
We've won every single one.
Has anyone really won anything? Hopefully this is a step in the right direction. Didn't mean to start the thread off wrong. I'd like to see USAPA work with this and keep things out of court.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 06:37 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 224
Default

The USAPA has been pushing for DOH. They have "won" every case on their road to DOH. However, that road has now stretched to a decade and DOH is not yet in effect. The west has "lost" every case, but has successfully prevented DOH.

It now appears the west may get a separate seat at the table during this protocol with east permission. That's a big change from the days when USAPA was the sole agent.

At some point folks have to move on. Seriously. Is DOH only worth this fight? For the west, this also seems like a place to lay it out there. Might not get Nic, but should get something better than DOH. USAPA also can lay out why they consider DOH the only way to merge lists.
dynap09 is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 07:00 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by crzipilot View Post
Interestingly it seems as though APA is agreeing to have USAPA merger committee autonomous even after single carrier determination. The kicking point is paragraph 3.

Believe this is APA way of saying, ok if the west thinks it deserves it's own MC, then let's let it goto arbitration and let him decide. Sticking point I see is that there is a federal court ruling already answering that question.....So why let an arbitrator change that? Seems more along the lines of CYA by APA
I don't see where the West gets a seat. It sets up USAPA and APA committees. Did I miss something? Cursory reading, it appears to give USAPA what they want, which is the permanence of their merger commitee. I don't see at first glance anything in there USAPA would have major objection to.
ackattacker is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 07:54 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik View Post
Has anyone really won anything? Hopefully this is a step in the right direction. Didn't mean to start the thread off wrong. I'd like to see USAPA work with this and keep things out of court.
The proposal was to USAPA, but it is more important for AOL to listen carefully...

The APA made it clear they will not accept responsibility to establish a seperate West Merger Committee.... Let that sink in... The West can approach USAPA and negotiate a way to participate in the retirement vacancies on the East, or they can watch.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 10:27 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 449
Default

think it's in that section 3 there.....gives the west a chance to take it to arbitration and let the arbitrator decide. After the lawsuits that have already been decided, have a feeling USAPA will not agree to that..
crzipilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Foxcow
Trans States Airlines
147
02-23-2009 09:08 PM
Phlying Phallus
Major
191
02-12-2009 02:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices