Pilot Age Rule May Change Again
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Just the thought of that possibility could cause a heart attack and the accompanying loss of one's medical certificate.
But thinking of your proposal... I'm still unable to think of a down side.
'
#72
Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Oh, and they already got 5 free years at the top. Whos greedy now?
#74
Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.
The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.
We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.
United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
#76
#77
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
I personally have no problem with this...
PROVIDED that the first class medical requirements change to require an annual cardiac stress test. A resting EKG is about worthless. Put everybody over the age of 60 or 65 on a treadmill and see how well they do and if any EKG anomalies become apparent. If there are no issues, then I have no problem with them continuing to fly provided that they can continue to pass recurrent training within defined limits both physically and mentally.
PROVIDED that the first class medical requirements change to require an annual cardiac stress test. A resting EKG is about worthless. Put everybody over the age of 60 or 65 on a treadmill and see how well they do and if any EKG anomalies become apparent. If there are no issues, then I have no problem with them continuing to fly provided that they can continue to pass recurrent training within defined limits both physically and mentally.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
We can certainly debate any age changes from a potential safety standpoint...but how do you make the case for making someone start over at the bottom of the list?
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


A few years of S80 LGA reserve would give pause to anyone thinking about staying!


