Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Pilot Age Rule May Change Again >

Pilot Age Rule May Change Again

Search

Notices

Pilot Age Rule May Change Again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2013 | 07:53 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Teddy dont scare me like that!

I propose letting any pilot over the age of 65 continue flying, as long as they start back over at the bottom of the company seniority list A few years of S80 LGA reserve would give pause to anyone thinking about staying!

Just the thought of that possibility could cause a heart attack and the accompanying loss of one's medical certificate.

But thinking of your proposal... I'm still unable to think of a down side.
'
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 09:56 AM
  #72  
Klako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Military Flight Instructor
Default

Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.

Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.

The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.

We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.

United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 10:30 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Klako
Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.

Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.

The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.

We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.

United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
But didn't every single one of these "capable older pilots" benefit their whole career from pilots being forced to retire ahead of them? I'm pretty sure they were all "greedy junior airline pilots" at one point too.

Oh, and they already got 5 free years at the top. Whos greedy now?
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 11:05 AM
  #74  
aapilotguy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Klako
Get rid of all mandatory retirement age rules.

Greedy junior airline pilots have always been salivating over the next senior pilot being forced to retire and thus allowing junior pilots to move up the seniority list.

The FAA's mandatory retirement age of 65 rule for airline pilots is still nothing less than blatant age discrimination and it has been greedy junior pilots and the damn unions that represent them who continue to perpetuate stupid mandatory pilot retirement age rules. Pilots should have the choice of flying for as long as they wish and are able to pass the FAA's medical exam.

We are loosing our nation’s most qualified airline pilots. The United States government forces most of its most experienced airline pilots out of their profession simply because of a harmful and seriously out-dated law. Age alone must not be the sole determination as to when an airline pilot must retire.

United States Part 121 air carriers have thousands of highly experienced, skilled and capable older pilots. It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty that the most experienced pilots are excluded from flying for a Part 121 airline only because once they celebrate their 65th birthday, regardless of their health, are forced to retire. There should be no age limit in being an airline pilot. The current age 65 rule imposed by the FAA has no basis in science, yet it is still on the books. It is time to rescind this outdated regulation, and allow our best experienced pilots to continue doing heir job. --- An x-airline pilot forced to retire at age 60 and still ****ed-off about it.
Didn't you know that when you signed up?
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:18 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Default

OMG looks like someone is about to turn 65

Happy Birthday to dinosaur.

From,
Greedy junior*
Reply
Old 03-04-2015 | 12:40 PM
  #76  
Dashdog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Klako
It is a crime against a pilots' civil liberty
I missed this part of the pilots' constitution. Could you post a copy?

Perhaps you do need to retire. Looks like it took you almost two years to react to this thread.
Maybe you can make-do on your government pension.
Reply
Old 03-05-2015 | 05:28 PM
  #77  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dashdog
I missed this part of the pilots' constitution. Could you post a copy?
...
Pilot's constitution:

Me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, more, more, more, more, money, money, money, money, women, women, women, women.
Reply
Old 03-07-2015 | 01:43 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
I personally have no problem with this...

PROVIDED that the first class medical requirements change to require an annual cardiac stress test. A resting EKG is about worthless. Put everybody over the age of 60 or 65 on a treadmill and see how well they do and if any EKG anomalies become apparent. If there are no issues, then I have no problem with them continuing to fly provided that they can continue to pass recurrent training within defined limits both physically and mentally.
Agreed, but everyone should be required to pass the anual cardiac stress test regardless of age.
Reply
Old 03-07-2015 | 01:46 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by labbats
Fly as long as you can hold a 1st class medical, but when you turn 65 you start over at the bottom of the seniority list.
We can certainly debate any age changes from a potential safety standpoint...but how do you make the case for making someone start over at the bottom of the list?
Reply
Old 03-07-2015 | 01:51 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Seaslap8
We can certainly debate any age changes from a potential safety standpoint...but how do you make the case for making someone start over at the bottom of the list?
You could never legally make that case.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bla bla bla
Regional
163
11-05-2007 09:18 PM
Jack Bauer
Regional
100
10-27-2007 10:33 AM
bla bla bla
Regional
49
09-30-2007 07:56 AM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices