Search
Notices

SLI timeline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2013, 01:47 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 100
Default

There are essentially 4 lists right now.

-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list

It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.

Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
Irishish is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 02:05 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Irishish View Post
There are essentially 4 lists right now.

-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list

It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.

Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
This is all a big unknown and why we are in court. The west's position is there is only one combined list on airways side and that list is the Nicolau. MB specifically prohibits its use to us/aa merger and applies only to us/aa
cactiboss is offline  
Old 08-08-2013, 05:29 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,484
Default

Originally Posted by Irishish View Post
I'm fairly certain that this is the reason the JCBA must be completed before the SLI is even arbitrated. The East/West list wasn't to be implemented until AFTER the JCBA. The lesson was learned and the last three big mergers have done it the way US/AA are about to.
That is correct.

I will disagree with Relay on the JCBA timeline. The MOU becomes the MTA at the POR. (Don't you love all the acronyms?) The MTA, the merger transition agreement, comes in effect at the effective date and puts the Airways pilots, east and west on green book at the POR. There are some exceptions, like scheduling and bidding processes, west short term disability program, but we are on the APA contract at that date. The JCBA stuff is the cleaning up of the open issues in reconciling Airways with the APA. I get this from paragraph 4 of the MOU. I don't think it will take a year to get the JCBA done. I also think that once the Airways list is determined the SLI will be done quickly as well. That 24 months is the upper limit for time, and the SLI is done in parallel with the JCBA stuff.

Pulling a USAPA will be close to impossible. As was said, the SLI process is mandated in the MOU. McCaskille-Bond is federal law, there's no way of ducking out of the decision. Final and binding will be final and binding.

Fire away.
cactusmike is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 07:08 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike View Post

I will disagree with Relay on the JCBA timeline.
Just to be clear, it's not my timeline, it is from USAPA's guide. They have UP TO 12 months to finish the JCBA and arbitration cannot start until then. They then have UP TO 24 months to finish it.

I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 09:59 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DrivinTheDash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: B-757/767 FO
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
Just to be clear, it's not my timeline, it is from USAPA's guide. They have UP TO 12 months to finish the JCBA and arbitration cannot start until then. They then have UP TO 24 months to finish it.

I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
The timeline actually isn't quite so drawn out in the MOU, because the SLI work, up to the actual arbitration, runs concurrently with the JCBA negotiations. The only thing that can't happen until after the JCBA is the actual arbitration proceeding, from the start of which an award is to be rendered within 6 months, and not more than 24 months from the effective date of the POR.

Originally Posted by MOU
10. a. A seniority integration process consistent with McCaskill-Bond shall begin as soon as possible
after the Effective Date. If, on the date ninety (90) days following the Effective Date, direct
negotiations have failed to result in a merged seniority list acceptable to the pilots at both airlines, a
panel of three neutral arbitrators will be designated within fifteen (15) days to resolve the dispute,
pursuant to the authority and requirements of McCaskill-Bond. That arbitration proceeding will
commence no later than 60 days after the designation of the arbitrators, or as soon thereafter as
practicable given the availability of the designated arbitrators, provided that it is understood that, in no
event, shall the seniority integration arbitration proceeding commence prior to final approval of the
JCBA pursuant to the deadlines and procedures in Paragraph 27 below. The panel of arbitrators will
render its award within six (6) months of the commencement of the arbitration, and in any event not
later than 24 months after the Effective Date.
Everything leading up to the SLI arbitration, including SLI negotiations and selecting a panel of arbitrators, will occur while we hammer out a final JCBA agreement.
DrivinTheDash is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 10:12 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by DrivinTheDash View Post
The timeline actually isn't quite so drawn out in the MOU, because the SLI work, up to the actual arbitration, runs concurrently with the JCBA negotiations. The only thing that can't happen until after the JCBA is the actual arbitration proceeding, from the start of which an award is to be rendered within 6 months, and not more than 24 months from the effective date of the POR.



Everything leading up to the SLI arbitration, including SLI negotiations and selecting a panel of arbitrators, will occur while we hammer out a final JCBA agreement.
Ah, you and Mike are correct. I was reading it as 24 months from the start of arbitration, which can't start until JCBA, but it is 24 months from Effective date. My mistake, thanks for the correction.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 10:15 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

You would think.... That with the mou and delta entering talks in 2015 that the new American has the chance with their jcba to gain an industry leading contract especially being the largest airline in the world
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 11:46 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO View Post
You would think.... That with the mou and delta entering talks in 2015 that the new American has the chance with their jcba to gain an industry leading contract especially being the largest airline in the world
The Mou gives us a parity adjustment in 2016, so if DAL gets a raise we should as well. I don't recall if it's reviewed every year after that.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 02:38 PM
  #19  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
The Mou gives us a parity adjustment in 2016, so if DAL gets a raise we should as well. I don't recall if it's reviewed every year after that.
How about raising the bar instead of happily treading water? It's about time you all did some heavy lifting to improve the industry instead of being deadweight.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 08-09-2013, 02:45 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank View Post
How about raising the bar instead of happily treading water? It's about time you all did some heavy lifting to improve the industry instead of being deadweight.
I'll get right on that as soon as AA exits bankruptcy and we get rid of usapa.
cactiboss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airhoss
United
11
07-05-2013 03:34 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM
EWR73FO
United
1
12-13-2012 07:05 PM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices