SLI timeline
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 100
There are essentially 4 lists right now.
-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list
It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.
Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list
It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.
Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
#12
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
There are essentially 4 lists right now.
-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list
It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.
Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
-AA
-East+3rd list
-West+3rd list
It seem like the East pilots would like the arbitrators to look at this like a 3-way merger and integrate the groups that way. What if some West pilots get slotted higher in the NEW new list than even the Nicolau? Especially with respect to "relative" seniority it would seem with two fairly large groups (AA and US) and one much smaller group (AWA) that this could happen.
Would AWA pilots complain that the Nicolau wasn't used as a starting point? Would East pilots do the same?
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,484
I will disagree with Relay on the JCBA timeline. The MOU becomes the MTA at the POR. (Don't you love all the acronyms?) The MTA, the merger transition agreement, comes in effect at the effective date and puts the Airways pilots, east and west on green book at the POR. There are some exceptions, like scheduling and bidding processes, west short term disability program, but we are on the APA contract at that date. The JCBA stuff is the cleaning up of the open issues in reconciling Airways with the APA. I get this from paragraph 4 of the MOU. I don't think it will take a year to get the JCBA done. I also think that once the Airways list is determined the SLI will be done quickly as well. That 24 months is the upper limit for time, and the SLI is done in parallel with the JCBA stuff.
Pulling a USAPA will be close to impossible. As was said, the SLI process is mandated in the MOU. McCaskille-Bond is federal law, there's no way of ducking out of the decision. Final and binding will be final and binding.
Fire away.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Just to be clear, it's not my timeline, it is from USAPA's guide. They have UP TO 12 months to finish the JCBA and arbitration cannot start until then. They then have UP TO 24 months to finish it.
I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
#15
Just to be clear, it's not my timeline, it is from USAPA's guide. They have UP TO 12 months to finish the JCBA and arbitration cannot start until then. They then have UP TO 24 months to finish it.
I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
I don't think anyone is looking for it to go that long, the number I usually hear is 24 months from POR and we're done.
Originally Posted by MOU
10. a. A seniority integration process consistent with McCaskill-Bond shall begin as soon as possible
after the Effective Date. If, on the date ninety (90) days following the Effective Date, direct
negotiations have failed to result in a merged seniority list acceptable to the pilots at both airlines, a
panel of three neutral arbitrators will be designated within fifteen (15) days to resolve the dispute,
pursuant to the authority and requirements of McCaskill-Bond. That arbitration proceeding will
commence no later than 60 days after the designation of the arbitrators, or as soon thereafter as
practicable given the availability of the designated arbitrators, provided that it is understood that, in no
event, shall the seniority integration arbitration proceeding commence prior to final approval of the
JCBA pursuant to the deadlines and procedures in Paragraph 27 below. The panel of arbitrators will
render its award within six (6) months of the commencement of the arbitration, and in any event not
later than 24 months after the Effective Date.
after the Effective Date. If, on the date ninety (90) days following the Effective Date, direct
negotiations have failed to result in a merged seniority list acceptable to the pilots at both airlines, a
panel of three neutral arbitrators will be designated within fifteen (15) days to resolve the dispute,
pursuant to the authority and requirements of McCaskill-Bond. That arbitration proceeding will
commence no later than 60 days after the designation of the arbitrators, or as soon thereafter as
practicable given the availability of the designated arbitrators, provided that it is understood that, in no
event, shall the seniority integration arbitration proceeding commence prior to final approval of the
JCBA pursuant to the deadlines and procedures in Paragraph 27 below. The panel of arbitrators will
render its award within six (6) months of the commencement of the arbitration, and in any event not
later than 24 months after the Effective Date.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
The timeline actually isn't quite so drawn out in the MOU, because the SLI work, up to the actual arbitration, runs concurrently with the JCBA negotiations. The only thing that can't happen until after the JCBA is the actual arbitration proceeding, from the start of which an award is to be rendered within 6 months, and not more than 24 months from the effective date of the POR.
Everything leading up to the SLI arbitration, including SLI negotiations and selecting a panel of arbitrators, will occur while we hammer out a final JCBA agreement.
Everything leading up to the SLI arbitration, including SLI negotiations and selecting a panel of arbitrators, will occur while we hammer out a final JCBA agreement.
#17
You would think.... That with the mou and delta entering talks in 2015 that the new American has the chance with their jcba to gain an industry leading contract especially being the largest airline in the world
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
The Mou gives us a parity adjustment in 2016, so if DAL gets a raise we should as well. I don't recall if it's reviewed every year after that.
#19
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
How about raising the bar instead of happily treading water? It's about time you all did some heavy lifting to improve the industry instead of being deadweight.
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post