Search

Notices

Usapa disaster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2013 | 06:13 PM
  #11  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually, it's the opposite. Most of the DPA supporters are dead set on the destruction of ALPA. No matter the cost.
Some are. And if by some miracle the DPA gets elected in, I think you'll find a similar contingent of ALPA die hards looking to do anything to destroy the DPA.

Emotion is the root of irrational thought, and there are those that have strong emotional connections to each entity. Those are the ones you have to worry about.

The direct parallel to usapa isn't a great analogy, but it does work on some levels. The divide amongst usair/awa pilots has no parallel. That is the key underlying cause. As a contrast, DPA has many supporters hailing from each of the pre merger airlines; there are other underlying issues at play.

With unity among pilots, DPA possibly could function and get good industry leading contracts like the IPA and SWAPA have achieved. We've got a profitable company, now we need to get appropriate gains from that. Being divided won't work, and we need to get this behind us for the next round of negotiations.
Reply
Old 08-29-2013 | 06:46 PM
  #12  
Dashdog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Mods: Doesn't this belong in the "If DAL leaves ALPA" thread? Better yet, move it to the Union Talk forum where it belongs. Actually, why not just spare everyone and lock this flame bait up now.
Reply
Old 08-29-2013 | 07:42 PM
  #13  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Excerpt from DAL Mec:

The idea of a runaway union like the DPA is not new. The most recent historical example illustrates just how ineffective a group like this can be. In 2008, several US Airways pilots formed a similar organization (USAPA), making virtually identical promises, using the same law firm as the DPA. Five years later, the only things USAPA has delivered are false hope and broken promises. The pilots don’t have a new contract. There is no change to the seniority system. The “professionals” who promised all these changes have been fired and they now work for the DPA.

Let’s be clear, DPA’s efforts are a blueprint of the USAPA disaster and we cannot afford to
repeat the US Airways fiasco here."
What? Don't be ridiculous. You cannot compare DPA to USAPA. DPA get the big issues... Namely the conflict of interest between ALPA majors and regionals.

Enjoy your "validation," but no level of ALPA fear mongering will make DPA anything like USAPA.

You're just gasping for any negative reference to USAPA.

This quote must have really made your day.
Reply
Old 08-29-2013 | 11:24 PM
  #14  
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood
Start calling them "Scabs" Cacti. ALPA can do no wrong when you get a perceived Windfall.
Well lets see here lil wood, that terms was reserved for you usappy clowns who just like the first post said promised the moon and delivered **** instead. You people busted a union because you felt that you should not have to honor your obligations under that arbitration. The DAL pilots never did that they took what they got and moved on to bigger and better while you stare LOA 93 in the teeth for yet another year.

WD at AWA
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 02:18 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: AB 320 Captain
Default

LOA 93 for another year is optimistic. I think the merger will not be approved in its present form and Parker will be recruited to run the new American. US will lose top management. The delay and no contract will continue for years.
We have a happy pilot group who keeps the operation on time and saves fuel. Why would management give a contract and stop the East/West division?
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 02:44 AM
  #16  
brakechatter's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Well lets see here lil wood, that terms was reserved for you usappy clowns who just like the first post said promised the moon and delivered **** instead. You people busted a union because you felt that you should not have to honor your obligations under that arbitration. The DAL pilots never did that they took what they got and moved on to bigger and better while you stare LOA 93 in the teeth for yet another year.

WD at AWA

Most I have spoken with voted ALPA off, rather than actually vote somebody else in, due to a bunch of events other than the arbitration. The arbitration merely broke the camel's back.

As for LOA 93, you are stuck on it as well. In fact, you have been stuck on it for much longer than the East pilots if you are a legacy AW pilot. You should be used to low pay. Perhaps a quick check of the walls before you cast that stone.
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 05:46 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
Most I have spoken with voted ALPA off, rather than actually vote somebody else in, due to a bunch of events other than the arbitration. The arbitration merely broke the camel's back.
You cannot get some westies (and others it seems) to believe this, even though it is a fact. There is no way that just those really mad about the Nic could have gotten rid of ALPA on their own. I'd say the handling of the pension and LOA 93 were bigger factors.

I guess if reality doesn't fit your argument you have to come up with your own reality.
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 05:59 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
You cannot get some westies (and others it seems) to believe this, even though it is a fact. There is no way that just those really mad about the Nic could have gotten rid of ALPA on their own. I'd say the handling of the pension and LOA 93 were bigger factors.

I guess if reality doesn't fit your argument you have to come up with your own reality.
....and yet 100% of USAPA's focus since then has been only about the Nic, merger or not. Regaining/resolving the other two have seem to fallen out of sight of their rear-view mirror, long ago.

I find the assertion that the Nic was a "last straw" issue to be as much of a rationalization/excuse as any other claim.

Just my observation..........
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 06:08 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
....and yet 100% of USAPA's focus since then has been only about the Nic, merger or not. Regaining/resolving the other two have seem to fallen out of sight of their rear-view mirror, long ago.

I find the assertion that the Nic was a "last straw" issue to be as much of a rationalization/excuse as any other claim.

Just my observation..........
That's not true, but you are not here to see the other things going on. Neither side has been willing to let the Nic fight go, but the west has made EVERYTHING about the NIC. They fight us on every single issue, and most have nothing to do with the Nic.

You can believe the last straw argument or not, but I was here. I voted for ALPA for several different reasons, none of them being that I actually had a high opinion of ALPA. Without the support of the senior guys that were unaffected, or only slightly affected by the Nic, USAPA would not have been elected.

If we were not a divided pilot group over the SLI I would have voted for an independent union in a heartbeat. You should have seen the obscene amount of money ALPA threw at us to get us to stay.
Reply
Old 08-30-2013 | 07:50 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
You cannot get some westies (and others it seems) to believe this, even though it is a fact. There is no way that just those really mad about the Nic could have gotten rid of ALPA on their own. I'd say the handling of the pension and LOA 93 were bigger factors.

I guess if reality doesn't fit your argument you have to come up with your own reality.
Today I would have been better off, given the amount of time that has passed and my age, had the Nic been settled. LOA 93, but more so the handling of the pension (among other issues) were the main reasons.The handling of the Nic. was just the proverbial straw.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
texaspilot76
Major
151
10-13-2012 03:13 AM
FlySlow
Major
43
04-23-2012 04:51 PM
cactiboss
Major
49
07-31-2011 06:48 PM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-18-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices