![]() |
Have you sent it to the SLI committee?
|
3 way seniority integration-Fire Away
In the end, the arbitrator is keen on evenly distributing pilots. Both sides (USAPA and APA) can try to appreciate their positions with maximum credits, but the arbitrator will cut through all of this inflation for an award.
Review of the most recent UAL-CAL award is beneficial insight into how Arbitrator Eishen operates. |
Originally Posted by encore
(Post 1740566)
If 3 separate lists are brought together, everyone seems to agree that it would most likely be the lists that were in effect either on the announcement date or the POR.
With this in mind, in a 3-way combination, is it possible that a pre-AA merger US East new hire (someone hired in 2006-2012) could end up senior to a West pilot hired before the HP/US merger? |
Originally Posted by encore
(Post 1740566)
If 3 separate lists are brought together, everyone seems to agree that it would most likely be the lists that were in effect either on the announcement date or the POR.
With this in mind, in a 3-way combination, is it possible that a pre-AA merger US East new hire (someone hired in 2006-2012) could end up senior to a West pilot hired before the HP/US merger? |
Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
(Post 1740579)
Only if one holds the HP logic of yesteryear.
|
If you're going to toss the Nic seems to me you'd have to consider 4 lists, pre-merger East and West, US AIR 3rd listers, and pre merger AA.
|
Originally Posted by TallFlyer
(Post 1740607)
If you're going to toss the Nic seems to me you'd have to consider 4 lists, pre-merger East and West, US AIR 3rd listers, and pre merger AA.
|
Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
(Post 1740613)
The so called "Third Listers" are part of the East list, there is no Third Lister List.
|
Originally Posted by TallFlyer
(Post 1740617)
My point being that if you just did a hypothetical relative seniority integration of the East and West list, with all the "Third Listers" as part of the East list, the Westies would be justified in being more than a little upset with that. Ultimately Third Listers should be junior to anyone hired prior to the announcement of the East/West Merger.
3 lists means 3 lists. |
Originally Posted by encore
(Post 1740619)
Why is that necessarily so? Why should someone that can hold 190 CA or 330 FO be put behind someone who can only hold reserve 320 FO?
3 lists means 3 lists. May you live in interesting times. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands