Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
APA Neg. Committee JCBA presentation >

APA Neg. Committee JCBA presentation

Search
Notices

APA Neg. Committee JCBA presentation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2015, 03:46 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
That's what I got from Parker's crew news, but do you see any downfall to the union with that happening? It seems to me that it really made the APFA look bad. At least with a lot of F/As I know.
I think as long as the membership understand the process, then no. Even if this whole process made the union look bad, I don't see how it would have any real world effect. Plus like all the airlines I've worked at, there's always a negativity towards the union anyways.
Feng is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 03:47 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Feng View Post
No comments because I make too much sense?
You make perfect logical sense to me. But then again, I see past the pay because it doesn't bait me like it does so many here.
Just trust them is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 03:49 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
But that was also if the BOD comes back on the knees, unanimously.
One step at a time I would say. If the membership demand it, I don't see it not happening.
Feng is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 03:51 PM
  #54  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Feng View Post
Okay, makes sense, I was talking averages. Figure in group 2 fo pay, I don't think my 15K/pilot valuation was "way off" as you put it. very reasonable in fact so after taxes, all said and done, we're really only taking about 9K here.

Even for you personally using captain wages, 13K tops.
You have to use before tax numbers because that's how we get paid. So now average out how many trips you do that the rig would trigger, then compare those trips using mou pay and JCBA pay. Look at it like this for group 2 fo:
Mou pay: 10 hrs x $126= $1260
JCBA pay: 10 hrs x $155= $1550
Mou pay + 5:10 rig: 15:30 x $126= $1953

So you make $403 more per trip IF you vote this down and get min day 7 mos down the line. Now here's the kicker, less than 3% of the trips are affected by this rig! most guys never ever fly one and it won't affect reserves. So let's say you average one of these per month
12mosx $403=$4836

So the logic is give up 7 mos raise ( 560hrs x $30=$17 k + $2700 401k)$19.7 k and trade it for a potential $4800 benefit.
Now does that look like a good business deal? But wait it gets better, what do you think our chances are of getting the rig after arb? I'll be generous and give you 10%. You willing to bet $20k on a 10% chance to get $4800?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:06 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
You have to use before tax numbers because that's how we get paid. So now average out how many trips you do that the rig would trigger, then compare those trips using mou pay and JCBA pay. Look at it like this for group 2 fo:
Mou pay: 10 hrs x $126= $1260
JCBA pay: 10 hrs x $155= $1550
Mou pay + 5:10 rig: 15:30 x $126= $1953

So you make $403 more per trip IF you vote this down and get min day 7 mos down the line. Now here's the kicker, less than 3% of the trips are affected by this rig! most guys never ever fly one and it won't affect reserves. So let's say you average one of these per month
12mosx $403=$4836

So the logic is give up 7 mos raise ( 560hrs x $30=$17 k + $2700 401k)$19.7 k and trade it for a potential $4800 benefit.
Now does that look like a good business deal? But wait it gets better, what do you think our chances are of getting the rig after arb? I'll be generous and give you 10%. You willing to bet $20k on a 10% chance to get $4800?
Look, my personal logic is that even with calendar day, it's not personally worth it for me. That's just me though.

But using what you just posted. 5K/year for the duration of the contract, 6years, is worth ~30K . PLUS, we don't have to give up anything next round to get it, what is that worth? Vs a 1 time potential loss of 20K.

I think the concessions are worth a lot more to them then it does to us thus it's worth gambling on. What the **** is 20K(half that after taxes) when I stand to make at least 800K in the next 6 years anyways
Feng is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:10 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
You have to use before tax numbers because that's how we get paid. So now average out how many trips you do that the rig would trigger, then compare those trips using mou pay and JCBA pay. Look at it like this for group 2 fo:
Mou pay: 10 hrs x $126= $1260
JCBA pay: 10 hrs x $155= $1550
Mou pay + 5:10 rig: 15:30 x $126= $1953

So you make $403 more per trip IF you vote this down and get min day 7 mos down the line. Now here's the kicker, less than 3% of the trips are affected by this rig! most guys never ever fly one and it won't affect reserves. So let's say you average one of these per month
12mosx $403=$4836

So the logic is give up 7 mos raise ( 560hrs x $30=$17 k + $2700 401k)$19.7 k and trade it for a potential $4800 benefit.
Now does that look like a good business deal? But wait it gets better, what do you think our chances are of getting the rig after arb? I'll be generous and give you 10%. You willing to bet $20k on a 10% chance to get $4800?
Good job with the calculator!

Now put it down, get back on your knees and shine Doug's shoes.

Remember, keep your ears open and report back. Don't bring the calculator.
Just trust them is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:13 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Pilots are irrational pessimists about their own actions and irrational optimists regarding the good will of management rush jobs, in the face of all simple history to the contrary. Short sighted individualists with mesmerizing dollar signs reflected in their pupils. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:20 PM
  #58  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Feng View Post
Look, my personal logic is that even with calendar day, it's not personally worth it for me. That's just me though.

But using what you just posted. 5K/year for the duration of the contract, 6years, is worth ~30K . PLUS, we don't have to give up anything next round to get it, what is that worth? Vs a 1 time potential loss of 20K.

I think the concessions are worth a lot more to them then it does to us thus it's worth gambling on. What the **** is 20K(half that after taxes) when I stand to make at least 800K in the next 6 years anyways
Again those numbers are group 2 Fo only. If u upgrade that extra last year pays $30k more than Mou does just for 2019. Vote no, that's fine but I wanted to make sure you understood the real math.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:27 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
You should always worry about Parker and Kirby, they aren't our friends and their no Anderson, that is why I vote yes. They had no problem running usairways with unhappy pilots and I believe they will have no problem walking away and doing it again. In section 6 I want to be in a position to only need qol items not need to fight for pay as well.

P.s we are a terrorist attack/crisis away from this being all mute, take it while u can and build on it.
I agree with you on all points.
justjack is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 04:30 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Again those numbers are group 2 Fo only. If u upgrade that extra last year pays $30k more than Mou does just for 2019. Vote no, that's fine but I wanted to make sure you understood the real math.
Aren't we working on the assumption that with a no vote, we'll get the TA either way, as Parker stated, just with no retro 7 months later, or are you being dull on purpose?

Because if we weren't using that assumption, the numbers would be a heck of a lot more than just 30K. And of course you already knew that.

I feel like I'm debating logically and you're throwing bogus statements out there.
Feng is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
say that again
Cargo
2
04-04-2011 06:59 PM
Spanky189
Major
13
01-30-2010 10:11 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices