Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Atlas/Polar (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/atlas-polar/)
-   -   Atlas / Southern (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/atlas-polar/118493-atlas-southern.html)

Elevation 10-27-2019 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by Turbine1 (Post 2913464)
The log-jam is our execs have no regard for the pilot group if they ever did. When they can’t tell the difference between one of our pilots and an American pilot in uniform on one of our picket lines that’s clear. When they refuse to even discuss maternity leave in negotiations when we have maybe one female pilot a year needing said leave, it’s clear. Safety is not their concern, moving airplanes is.

Our execs are now like the autopilot to keep the company straight and level until the fuel runs out. It appears their only goal is to make it to the point where they can fragment AAWH profitably. Since they already know a pilot group ( or a much smaller one ) will not be needed in the future, why spend money, time and manpower now to make needed safety improvements?

The company set the example when they fired that Captain from his instructor position for giving factual testimony in court about fatigue calls which brought to light that the company was cherry picking and twisting fatigue delays to make it appear the pilots were engaged in an illegal work slowdown. The company won the overall case anyway but one of our best instructors still got canned...as a message to anyone who dares speak up. Even though the union got his position back after 7 months the middle managers aren’t going to fall on their swords and lose their livelihood.

They’ll be no long term repercussions from the accident. Sure AAWH may be excoriated in the final report, but as it appears we’ll be losing major flying anyway due to lack of crew a financial hit will be minimal. By the time the report comes out the shareholders will have the stock down in the single digits. Any lawsuits will be settled out of court.

I don't disagree.

So what's the solution?

Since leading our organizations into necessary change isn't happening, we may need to drive them into action. Who do we have looking after the crew's survivability right now?

ROBsINtheHOOD 10-27-2019 03:31 PM

This thread by itself is an indictment upon the US legal system , it’s shameful bias and it’s inability to promote fairness , flight safety and should be used in future reference to attribute cause and blame exactly where it deserves to be.

Elevation 10-27-2019 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by ROBsINtheHOOD (Post 2913591)
This thread by itself is an indictment upon the US legal system , it’s shameful bias and it’s inability to promote fairness , flight safety and should be used in future reference to attribute cause and blame exactly where it deserves to be.

You know, I'm as disappointed in the system as anyone. I don't think these failures are new, however. In truth, there's always been a tug of war for the soul of this industry and others.

We also live in a period of historic airline safety globally and in the US. That's reason for hope. If the world and the country can figure out how to avoid killing people, all we have to do is adopt best practices to get 90% of the way there.

We just have to drive our respective organizations to get up and act.

DC8DRIVER 10-27-2019 09:07 PM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 2913633)
Y
We just have to drive our respective organizations to get up and act.

I think you are gravely mistaken if you think that anyone other than the management of Atlas can change the outcome of this catastrophe. AAWW is headed out of the airline business and will become nothing more than a leasing company and we couldn't stop them even if we said we'd fly for free. They have driven this ship beyond the point of no return.

sandman22 10-27-2019 09:25 PM


Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER (Post 2913711)
I think you are gravely mistaken if you think that anyone other than the management of Atlas can change the outcome of this catastrophe. AAWW is headed out of the airline business and will become nothing more than a leasing company and we couldn't stop them even if we said we'd fly for free. They have driven this ship beyond the point of no return.

So AAWW wants to drastically shrink their company to that of only an aircraft leasing company and give all of their airline business to companies like Kalitta? What kind of a management team does this? Do they not like making money? They'd prefer to make a lot less? This doesn't make any sense. Though I agree their actions are proving that they seem to prefer to make less money.

MoarAlpha 10-28-2019 12:05 AM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 2913357)
It doesn't take that long to enact corrections, though. The lack of action on general and predictable safety issues is more troubling than the delay on the report. There's some sort of log-jam even in delivering basic and easy improvements that we really need to get on.

Honestly, I don't think there's a problem with the individual leaders involved. Individually all these people are rational and generally moral. How we all come together to build a system that can't even deliver or even start to push for a LOSA program after is really troubling.

Do we have too much cheerleading going on to maintain a dysfunctional status quo in flight operations? Are people afraid to speak up?


I

Atlas has never had a LOSA?

thepotato232 10-28-2019 01:41 AM


Originally Posted by sandman22 (Post 2913716)
So AAWW wants to drastically shrink their company to that of only an aircraft leasing company and give all of their airline business to companies like Kalitta? What kind of a management team does this?

The sardonic answer would be "a team that does not want to run an airline". Running an airline is a lot of work. Lots of nasty words like "regulation" and "safety" in play that are anathema to the last few generations of MBAs. Signing leases, exercising stock options, gladhanding their buddies on other boards of directors? Easy peasy. The management team would be the only winners in AAWW in your scenario, and many outside observers would guess they seem perfectly at ease with that outcome.

Elevation 10-28-2019 08:19 AM


Originally Posted by MoarAlpha (Post 2913730)
Atlas has never had a LOSA?

A long time ago Atlas attempted a LOSA, but the program faltered. This was before my time here, and I heard they used check-airmen as LOSA observers, which would be self-defeating.

I'm just checking this now, so please excuse me if I haven't gotten back to anyone yet. I'll have more time in a little bit.

4runner 10-28-2019 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by Riverside (Post 2913151)
You're a gem.

Hahahahaha. A good writer too. Solid decision maker also.

Twin Wasp 10-28-2019 10:47 PM


Originally Posted by Elevation (Post 2913866)
A long time ago Atlas attempted a LOSA, but the program faltered. This was before my time here, and I heard they used check-airmen as LOSA observers, which would be self-defeating.

As I recall it was one pilot who was out on long term med taking notes. No idea what happened with his notes.

And no FOQA. Except the company is pulling data recorders for information, it’s just the crews have none of the protections of an official FOQA program.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands