Search

Notices

Retirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2023 | 09:19 AM
  #31  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Watto
Yeah I see both sides. Improvement to retirement now (well, 2025 and 2026) gives Atlas pilots a better starting point when contract negotiations actually start - the fact this is a mid-contract increase seems to be lost on some.

As for the Aussies, I've heard jumpseating has been pretty good for most. A confirmed 15 hour economy seat isn't that much more comfortable than a standby 15 hour economy seat... It might keep a few guys who are already on the fence but it's hardly going to lead to the Yahoo Serious invasion.

This does lend certainty to the large cohort of US citizen pilots living abroad who have seen the policy change seemingly month to month recently, a lot who have been at Atlas a long time.

But on the other hand, this outpouring of generosity is showing that management is weakened and cannot attract or retain enough pilots for future goals.

Tempting to say, "Nah, what else you got?"
It doesn't have to be "Nah, what else you got?" -- I'd be at least a little content with the current LOA but no 2+ year wait. Start the DC at 16% right now. The LOA immediately solves the company's problem, and says we'll start to address the pilot group problems in a couple of years.
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 11:10 AM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by notthesame
It doesn't have to be "Nah, what else you got?" -- I'd be at least a little content with the current LOA but no 2+ year wait. Start the DC at 16% right now. The LOA immediately solves the company's problem, and says we'll start to address the pilot group problems in a couple of years.
Oh I agree, with both you and SgtV, just playing Devil's advocate is all. While the DC starting at 16% next year would be great, I don't think they'll be that quick bringing a new offer, if anything at all before contract time. An improvement is an improvement, and the perfect is the enemy of the good.
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 11:17 AM
  #33  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 109
Likes: 5
From: B-777 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by AboveMins
It's a no vote from me. Meager gains in retirement, in exchange for more foreign pilots willing to work for substandard pay and benefits. Make that a 18% DC today and a 15-20% pay increase, and I'd consider it.
I’m sorry, meager gains?? 16% is what each of the big three legacies currently get? How is that meager? It’s industry standard and a huge plus for our retirement. Hiring Australian pilots and other foreign nationals is the nature of the industry right now if you’re not DL/UA/AA. UPS and FDX aren’t even hiring and Spirit and Allegiant are both hiring a lot of Australian pilots right now as well. I hear them on the radio all the time. I personally welcome them. They’re helping grow our airline and they actually want to work here. Why not make their quality of life better? Why treat them as second class citizens. If you’re so dead set against hiring them I direct you careers.united.com or jobs.aa.com

I’m voting YES. Tired of self-destructive pilots voting out of spite.
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 11:37 AM
  #34  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Do what I’m told
Default

Originally Posted by ACMIguy
I’m sorry, meager gains?? 16% is what each of the big three legacies currently get? How is that meager? It’s industry standard and a huge plus for our retirement. Hiring Australian pilots and other foreign nationals is the nature of the industry right now if you’re not DL/UA/AA. UPS and FDX aren’t even hiring and Spirit and Allegiant are both hiring a lot of Australian pilots right now as well. I hear them on the radio all the time. I personally welcome them. They’re helping grow our airline and they actually want to work here. Why not make their quality of life better? Why treat them as second class citizens. If you’re so dead set against hiring them I direct you careers.united.com or jobs.aa.com

I’m voting YES. Tired of self-destructive pilots voting out of spite.
Love this ^^^^^^ 100% accurate
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 11:46 AM
  #35  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,059
Likes: 78
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by notthesame
It doesn't have to be "Nah, what else you got?" -- I'd be at least a little content with the current LOA but no 2+ year wait. Start the DC at 16% right now. The LOA immediately solves the company's problem, and says we'll start to address the pilot group problems in a couple of years.
What "company's problem"?
This seems to be the confusion for many. Company has no problem with XXX. They can do that tomorrow if they so choose with no input from the pilot group.

The only issue I have with this is that the green card pathway MOU should have been included in this LOA.
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 02:01 PM
  #36  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Watto
Yeah I see both sides. Improvement to retirement now (well, 2025 and 2026) gives Atlas pilots a better starting point when contract negotiations actually start - the fact this is a mid-contract increase seems to be lost on some.

As for the Aussies, I've heard jumpseating has been pretty good for most. A confirmed 15 hour economy seat isn't that much more comfortable than a standby 15 hour economy seat... It might keep a few guys who are already on the fence but it's hardly going to lead to the Yahoo Serious invasion.

This does lend certainty to the large cohort of US citizen pilots living abroad who have seen the policy change seemingly month to month recently, a lot who have been at Atlas a long time.

But on the other hand, this outpouring of generosity is showing that management is weakened and cannot attract or retain enough pilots for future goals.

Tempting to say, "Nah, what else you got?"
Different strokes for different folks but I’d like to respectfully disagree. The mental health impact of worrying about whether one will actually get a seat back to the US to fulfill roster obligation’s can sometimes be enough to bring on a stroke! So, the idea of a confirmed economy seat for international commuters is heaven!
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 02:17 PM
  #37  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 92
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by SgtV
Love this ^^^^^^ 100% accurate
I’ll second that. Very well said ACMIGuy
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 03:32 PM
  #38  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dera
What "company's problem"?
This seems to be the confusion for many. Company has no problem with XXX. They can do that tomorrow if they so choose with no input from the pilot group.

The only issue I have with this is that the green card pathway MOU should have been included in this LOA.
If the company is fine with it, then why did they promise it to foreign recruits and then suddenly... take it away? And when they took it away, low and behold, Australians began leaving.
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 06:00 PM
  #39  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 30
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by notthesame
If the company is fine with it, then why did they promise it to foreign recruits and then suddenly... take it away? And when they took it away, low and behold, Australians began leaving.
....and lo and behold, the Union steps in with this massive 'win'...
Reply
Old 10-13-2023 | 07:15 PM
  #40  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 5
From: In the pipe in the upstairs water closet
Default

Just a quick reminder, every US carrier that has hired Australians under the E3 program has had pay rises. I would venture a bet that those who espouse such vitriolic rubbish about ‘them over here’ and ‘happy to be paid in Koalas and Kangaroos’ would never say it to an Australian’s face. Instead, you announce your bigoted BS anonymously on an internet message board.

Feckless and gutless.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lewbronski
Southwest
87
02-24-2023 11:39 AM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
hopeSales
United
33
05-15-2014 02:58 PM
CactusCrew
Cargo
86
12-25-2009 08:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices