Atlas Interview on the 16th Jan in Miami
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 293
At this rate, if you meet the mins and apply you will get hired. "The rest is the captain's problem not the company's!"
The problem is, at the rate we are losing experienced pilots, he will be the Captain before he really knows what he is doing. His FO will be totally green and the rest as they say.........
The problem is, at the rate we are losing experienced pilots, he will be the Captain before he really knows what he is doing. His FO will be totally green and the rest as they say.........
#33
Great job. Great airplane. Easy trips for the most part. We DO need a new contract. It IS getting ugly with rhetoric etc trying to get said contract. There is good and bad with any job and Atlas is no exception. They need more experienced people in dispatch, travel, scheduling... it is NOT FedEx or UPS, but it's not a bad place to work. A new contract ratified by the pilots and it will be a much better place to work.
At Atlas, the scheduling, travel, and payroll departments have an inbred culture that constantly circumvents the contract and works to short pilots on benefits and pay. There are constant 20 and 22 hour days after which there may or may not be transportation to a hotel that may or may nor have accommodations for you. Etc., etc.
So, yes, great airplane. But if anybody comes here for the airplane, your sanity should be questioned.
8
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 293
#35
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: sandwich
Posts: 96
Atlas is not in a position to overlook any candidates that meet the qualifications. That being said, you will encounter a lot of the attitude below when you're out on line.
#36
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 34
I'm going to prefix my statement by saying I've been in the 74 for 4 years, so I'm not belittling anybody, BUT.....
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
#37
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 532
The ones who have issues are either not used to the 121 environment and what is expected in 121 training or, simply put, theyre just not strong pilots. Nerves play a big role in ride busts, too. The archaic check ride system is not conducive to building block learning.
Having said that, the training isn't great but it's not the Roscosmos program either. Just my two cents. The good news is, ride busts don't mean anything apparently. I can think of half a dozen people who busted their rides and are now at greener pastures.
But like he said, the real learning begins on the line. That's when you learn you didn't learn a thing.
Having said that, the training isn't great but it's not the Roscosmos program either. Just my two cents. The good news is, ride busts don't mean anything apparently. I can think of half a dozen people who busted their rides and are now at greener pastures.
But like he said, the real learning begins on the line. That's when you learn you didn't learn a thing.
Last edited by Whiplash6; 01-26-2017 at 05:00 PM.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 217
I'm going to prefix my statement by saying I've been in the 74 for 4 years, so I'm not belittling anybody, BUT.....
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 293
It's not the stick and rudder type problems that we seem to be having issues with (other than the multiple pod strikes and hard landings that are a very recent phenomenon,) and I agree the 74 is as easy an airplane to fly that you will find. The 76 is in my opinion slightly more challenging. It takes a lot more than great steep turns and flawless flows to fly a wide body jet between any two random points on this planet on any given day with minimal notice......it takes experience otherwise ideas on the flight deck run out very quickly and the consequences can be harsh. When you throw the extremely low morale into the mix, I'm concerned.
#40
I'm going to prefix my statement by saying I've been in the 74 for 4 years, so I'm not belittling anybody, BUT.....
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
Can someone please explain why the 747 presumed to give "RJ guys" problems. All the difficulties of the 74 as I see it, are operational (fatigue management, Africa, Middld East, language problems, etc.) and nothing to do with flying the plane. It is the easiest, most predictable bird I've ever flown. This is a classic case of pilots patting themselves in the back a little too much. By the way I've done the RJ thing too, 6 legs a day with 24 minute turns and the pressures of D-0 and A-14 in the nations busiest airports, dealing with multiple de-icing in the winters and thunderstorms they can't out-climb in the summer, every layover is 9 hrs and flying 90 hrs block a month......let's give the regional guys some credit folks, and while we're at let's stop over hyping the queen of the skies. She's a doll and you know it.
8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post