Time logged improperly
#11
I had an argument about this with an FAA inspector once. I was at the time flying with a guy who had a twin on a 135 certificate. He frequently had charters which meant empty legs. While inspecting my logbook for my 135 pic checkout for the same company the FAA examiner, who was also the 135 POI , saw that I had logged around 9 months of PIC time in the aircraft. He berated me for padding my logbook and doing it illegally. His argument was that I was not checked out for the 135 and that passengers pay for the empty legs. My argument was that the airplane is not operated under the 135 certificate but was being operated part 91 and I was appropriately trained and rated to fly those flights and the passengers did not know or pay for whether the airplane was being relocated 1o0 miles back to the aircrafts base or 1000 miles anywhere else.
This was the one and only time in my 13 years in aviation that I won an argument with the FAA.
This was the one and only time in my 13 years in aviation that I won an argument with the FAA.
#12
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 668
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Yes the pax pay indirectly for empty legs, but that doesn't stop you from operating them under 91. 135 is only required if the pax or cargo are onboard.
Amazing that these local guys have so much latitude to make up their own rules. I suspect he was former military with no GA experience at all.
Amazing that these local guys have so much latitude to make up their own rules. I suspect he was former military with no GA experience at all.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Yes the pax pay indirectly for empty legs, but that doesn't stop you from operating them under 91. 135 is only required if the pax or cargo are onboard.
Amazing that these local guys have so much latitude to make up their own rules. I suspect he was former military with no GA experience at all.
Amazing that these local guys have so much latitude to make up their own rules. I suspect he was former military with no GA experience at all.
I was once in a conference we requested in response to a Letter of Investigation. At first I thought the two Inspectors were playing "good cop-bad cop" until it dawned on me that they really disagreed with each other on the substance of whether certain conduct was a violation. It was an interesting dynamic to watch and we ultimately left when I decided that we weren't getting anywhere and were better off letting them sort it out without us.
Don't be surprised at the latitude. Ultimately interpretation is for the FAA attorneys, the NTSB and the Courts. But the guys on the front line, whether it be FAA or your local police officer, interpret the rules every day. While some of these guys may be into power and abuse their authority, most are just trying to do their jobs the best they can.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM



