Pilots' personal use of electronic devices
#1
Pilots' personal use of electronic devices
FAA bans pilots' personal use of electronic devices in cockpit
FAA bans pilots' personal use of electronic devices in cockpit | Mobile - CNET News
http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2014-02991_PI.pdf
FAA bans pilots' personal use of electronic devices in cockpit | Mobile - CNET News
http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2014-02991_PI.pdf
Last edited by rickair7777; 02-12-2014 at 07:25 AM. Reason: Fix Links
#2
You have to read the details and reference the FCC rules for definitions but it's unclear whether this applies to e-readers.
It sounds like the intent is to ban communication devices using cell service systems. E-readers have wifi that can be used to load new e-books, I'm not sure if they fall under the FCC definition.
It sounds like the intent is to ban communication devices using cell service systems. E-readers have wifi that can be used to load new e-books, I'm not sure if they fall under the FCC definition.
#4
I can enjoy the view for 20 minutes or so (in the west). Looking at 1000 mile eastern undercast was only cool for the first few minutes.
I agree 100% that "interactive" digital activities can be a distraction because they can "demand" your attention at certain moments which might be the same time you needed to catch that radio call. That kind of thing probably should be banned. Hard to say where to draw the line. But good old fashioned reading (hard copy or electronic) is nothing new and should be allowed. Without some kind of mental action, people are more prone to zone out or even doze on the backside. Sometimes the other guy isn't a great conversationalist.
#5
Page 16, under III. Discussion of Public Comments and Final Rule, Prohibited devices
"This broad category includes, but is not limited to, devices such as cell phones, smartphones, personal digital assistants, tablets, e-readers, some (but not all) gaming systems, iPods and MP3 players, as well as netbooks and notebook computers."
(emphasis mine)
(emphasis mine)
.
#6
I know 26 pages is a lot for most people to read, but what is unclear about this?
Page 16, under III. Discussion of Public Comments and Final Rule, Prohibited devicesThis change to § 121.542 essentially does nothing new, as it only repeats a prohibition already stated in 49 U.S. Code § 44732 - Prohibition on personal use of electronic devices on flight deck.
.
Page 16, under III. Discussion of Public Comments and Final Rule, Prohibited devices
"This broad category includes, but is not limited to, devices such as cell phones, smartphones, personal digital assistants, tablets, e-readers, some (but not all) gaming systems, iPods and MP3 players, as well as netbooks and notebook computers."
(emphasis mine)
(emphasis mine)
.
#8
Good luck with that argument when your friendly FAA Inspector takes issue with your use of an e-reader during cruise to break the boredom.
But I'm very interested to see which parts of the wasted 24 pages you believe to "contradict" or "muddle" the actual regulatory language.
(from your first post:
Here's the intent I read in the docket. In fact, it's on the first page, in the first paragraph:
"This rule ... is intended to ensure that certain non-essential activities do not contribute to the challenge of task management on the flight deck or a loss of situational awareness due to attention to non-essential tasks."
That doesn't even mention electronics or wireless, much less "cell service systems." Maybe that's what you wish it would say, but there's simply nothing to support such a wish.But if it's wireless ... eh, that's a tougher sell ...
Oh, what the hay, I'll save you all the clicks and just post it here:
(d) Personal Wireless Communications Device Defined.— In this section, the term “personal wireless communications device” means a device through which personal wireless services (as defined in section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(C)(i))) are transmitted.
And, then you can see you need to figure out what "personal wireless services" means. Again, you can click on the hyperlink, or you can read it here:(C) Definitions
For purposes of this paragraph—
Or ... better still, you could read the paragraph from the docket, from among the useless, worthless 24 pages, entitled "Prohibited devices":For purposes of this paragraph—
(i)the term “personal wireless services” means commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services;
"As stated in the NPRM, Section 307 of the Act defines 'personal wireless communications device' as a device through which personal wireless services (as defined in Section 332(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934) are transmitted. The Communications Act of 1934 states that personal wireless services means commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and common carrier wireless exchange access service."
Wow, ain't that handy!?!? BOTH references incorporated in the text of the docket! Oh, and if you still find that confusing, the next paragraph goes on to explain it further:"In general, wireless telecommunications is the transfer of information between two or more points that are not physically connected. In the final rule, the FAA retains the same broad category of included devices because a list of specific devices would ignore the reality of evolving technology. This broad category includes, but is not limited to, devices such as cell phones, smartphones, personal digital assistants, tablets, e-readers, some (but not all) gaming systems, iPods and MP3 players, as well as netbooks and notebook computers."
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post