Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
The Future Of Artificial Intelligence >

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

The Future Of Artificial Intelligence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2018 | 11:00 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
The answer could just as easily framed with the fact 80% of accidents involve human error. The Asiana SFO, AF447 and most other accidents in the last 18 years have involved planes in perfect order crashed by the humans.

GF
And how many crashes were prevented because of human intervention? Probably a lot more than the # of crashes you mention.
Reply
Old 10-31-2018 | 05:14 AM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 247
Default

It would be ironic if the FAs keep their jobs but pilots are done away with.

I can definitely see single pilot transport category aircraft in the near future, within ten years, flying domestically.
Reply
Old 10-31-2018 | 12:27 PM
  #133  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
It would be ironic if the FAs keep their jobs but pilots are done away with.

I can definitely see single pilot transport category aircraft in the near future, within ten years, flying domestically.
For real? You have a link to this transport cat. aircraft thats ten years out?
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 05:00 AM
  #134  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
I can definitely see single pilot transport category aircraft in the near future, within ten years, flying domestically.
Unless I'm missing something obvious, this simply cannot be accurate.
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 05:20 AM
  #135  
captjns's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
10M Airline Miles
20 Years
150 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,203
Likes: 48
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Default

Originally Posted by trip
For real? You have a link to this transport cat. aircraft thats ten years out?
Whose to say it won’t happen. There are lots of isolated, short and long routes, over the Pacific where the concept can be tested.... After all, who’d think they would put man on the moon 9 years after Mercury 1?
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 05:55 AM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Default

Remove all decisions which require a human and you can remove the human. It's more about changing the way we fly to run on AI than improving AI.
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 07:27 AM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by trip
For real? You have a link to this transport cat. aircraft thats ten years out?
You don't need a new airframe to integrate an AI like autopilot.

Just think of a typical takeoff. After rotation we must raise the gear and flaps. Why? Why isn't that automated? Or on landing, it can easily be automated as well. "Drop gear at xxxx altitude". Requested airspeed is xxx, place flaps at x. Etc.

ATC tells us what altitude to climb to, they tell us the route. There is no reason you couldn't integrate a higher level autopilot to completely take over operating the aircraft. The pilot would be there to deviate around weather and make command decisions and taxi.

In an emergency, say an engine out, the advanced autopilot would know the runway and location and execute perfect E/O procedures. It could also simultaneously detect a fire and put it out. All while you watch.

Have you used the newer drone software available today? You tell it where you want to go and it handles the rest. I envision that will be what aviation is like in the next generation. You are there to monitor.

I personally don't see aircraft operated from the ground at this point. But a reduction in pilots required? Sure.
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 11:08 AM
  #138  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
You don't need a new airframe to integrate an AI like autopilot.

Just think of a typical takeoff. After rotation we must raise the gear and flaps. Why? Why isn't that automated? Or on landing, it can easily be automated as well. "Drop gear at xxxx altitude". Requested airspeed is xxx, place flaps at x. Etc.

ATC tells us what altitude to climb to, they tell us the route. There is no reason you couldn't integrate a higher level autopilot to completely take over operating the aircraft. The pilot would be there to deviate around weather and make command decisions and taxi.

In an emergency, say an engine out, the advanced autopilot would know the runway and location and execute perfect E/O procedures. It could also simultaneously detect a fire and put it out. All while you watch.

Have you used the newer drone software available today? You tell it where you want to go and it handles the rest. I envision that will be what aviation is like in the next generation. You are there to monitor.

I personally don't see aircraft operated from the ground at this point. But a reduction in pilots required? Sure.
Not within the next 20 years. How long does it take to develop a new aircraft? Then get approval from the FAA. you wouldn’t be able to change a current aircraft to make it work.
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 11:25 AM
  #139  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
You don't need a new airframe to integrate an AI like autopilot.

Just think of a typical takeoff. After rotation we must raise the gear and flaps. Why? Why isn't that automated? Or on landing, it can easily be automated as well. "Drop gear at xxxx altitude". Requested airspeed is xxx, place flaps at x. Etc.

ATC tells us what altitude to climb to, they tell us the route. There is no reason you couldn't integrate a higher level autopilot to completely take over operating the aircraft. The pilot would be there to deviate around weather and make command decisions and taxi.

In an emergency, say an engine out, the advanced autopilot would know the runway and location and execute perfect E/O procedures. It could also simultaneously detect a fire and put it out. All while you watch.

Have you used the newer drone software available today? You tell it where you want to go and it handles the rest. I envision that will be what aviation is like in the next generation. You are there to monitor.

I personally don't see aircraft operated from the ground at this point. But a reduction in pilots required? Sure.
Under experimental rules of course. Cargo, maybe in 20yrs.
Passenger, not happening. German wings, Hacking, pilot incapacitation, pax reluctance, expense, FAA, could go on and on.
Reply
Old 11-01-2018 | 11:35 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by hilltopflyer
Not within the next 20 years. How long does it take to develop a new aircraft? Then get approval from the FAA. you wouldn’t be able to change a current aircraft to make it work.
Remember when FedEx converted their DC-10's and removed the flight engineer? And that was years ago.

https://newatlas.com/sikorsky-s-76-h...-flight/43650/

Good video at the end of the article. They have also flown a Caravan to test out the system. And that is over two years old. Here is a new one:

https://www.defensenews.com/land/201...he-first-time/

So no, you do not need a new aircraft design.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM
maximaman
Regional
31
09-03-2007 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices