An important factor to consider, and one that is often overlooked in these discussions, is whether or not the market, i.e. consumer, even _wants_ an airplane with no pilots on board.
Public acceptance of pilotless aircraft could and probably will change, but I think it will be many decades before we see the confluence of proven technology, public acceptance, and costs controlled to a level that will put pilots out of work in any meaningful scale. |
Originally Posted by Omnivorous
(Post 2512499)
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship."
Airmanship is a judgment and decisionmaking skill (which obviously includes use of automation). The one thing that AI hasn't been able to crack, even with the most advanced artificial intelligence today, is the ability to make decisions in a dynamic environment. In the long term, that extremely human characteristic is going to remain the reason our jobs are not going to be replaced by "automation" anytime soon. |
Originally Posted by Omnivorous
(Post 2512499)
What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?
|
Hacker15e
Chris Lutat of FDX wrote a book called, “Automation Airmanship”. Amazon has it. GF |
Originally Posted by Omnivorous
(Post 2512499)
"Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV"
|
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 2512567)
You want that from Boeing?
They're delivering 737MAX jets for the next 5-10 years and those jets will fly for 30+ years. I don't need to tell you what the cockpit looks like...! |
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
(Post 2512571)
GM and Ford didn't develop a driverless car; TESLA did. Similarly, Boeing won't create a pilotless plane (maybe Airbus), but it will likely be a brand new company (that could be bought by a major aircraft manufacturer).
First, that small company will produce a working pilotless plane. That plane will then spend 5-10 years proving that it is safe. Then, someone must build a large part 25 certified pilotless plane. Once some airline buys it, they will have to operate it with 2 pilots for about 10 years before they even think about changing regulations to let it be flown with 1 pilot. That is about 20 years AFTER someone creates a pilotless plane. Within that time, it is more likely that the economy will crash causing airlines to go bankrupt which will cause the pay rates to be slashed which will make pilots cheaper than R&D. And as others have said, the major manufacturers will want to extract as much money as they can out of their "legacy" 2 pilot airframes before they really push for a single pilot/no pilot plane. That means they will send tons of money to politicians to scare the public away from a single/no pilot plane until their 2 pilot cash cow airplanes are no longer worth it. In short, no pilot alive today has to worry about it. The only rub--people are already working on this today and are probably considering it a project with huge potential returns if they can beat the competition. |
Why are human beings so hellbent on finding ways to replace themselves and their own jobs.
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 2512649)
The nerds may design it, but the beancounters will kill it. 👎
GF |
If there is any form of transportation ripe for automation, it’s trains. They work in one dimension and two directions—forward and backward. They’re not going anywhere else, nothing happens in a hurry, either. Not even started happening. One coal operator automated a private train hauling coal about 20 miles on their property thirty years ago, closed now. Never duplicated.
GF |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands