Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

"Automated" Airmanship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2018 | 04:04 PM
  #1  
Omnivorous's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default "Automated" Airmanship

Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?

I suspect we will go single-pilot before the robots take over, doubling the size of the pilot labor force. I am curious to hear what others think about the state of the future.

(Please prove me wrong, by the way).
Reply
Old 01-26-2018 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
contrails's Avatar
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?
You want that from Boeing?

They're delivering 737MAX jets for the next 5-10 years and those jets will fly for 30+ years.

I don't need to tell you what the cockpit looks like...!
Reply
Old 01-26-2018 | 05:57 PM
  #3  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 93
Default

GM and Ford didn't develop a driverless car; TESLA did. Similarly, Boeing won't create a pilotless plane (maybe Airbus), but it will likely be a brand new company (that could be bought by a major aircraft manufacturer).

First, that small company will produce a working pilotless plane. That plane will then spend 5-10 years proving that it is safe. Then, someone must build a large part 25 certified pilotless plane. Once some airline buys it, they will have to operate it with 2 pilots for about 10 years before they even think about changing regulations to let it be flown with 1 pilot.

That is about 20 years AFTER someone creates a pilotless plane. Within that time, it is more likely that the economy will crash causing airlines to go bankrupt which will cause the pay rates to be slashed which will make pilots cheaper than R&D.

And as others have said, the major manufacturers will want to extract as much money as they can out of their "legacy" 2 pilot airframes before they really push for a single pilot/no pilot plane. That means they will send tons of money to politicians to scare the public away from a single/no pilot plane until their 2 pilot cash cow airplanes are no longer worth it.

In short, no pilot alive today has to worry about it.
Reply
Old 01-26-2018 | 05:59 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous
(Please prove me wrong, by the way)
You're wrong by the way.
Reply
Old 01-26-2018 | 07:17 PM
  #5  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Look around there’s a dozen threads on this subject.

GF
Reply
Old 01-26-2018 | 07:29 PM
  #6  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

The nerds may design it, but the beancounters will kill it. 👎
Reply
Old 01-27-2018 | 02:49 AM
  #7  
Danger Close's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: The Best Coast
Default

I can see a system of acknowledging cpdlc-like commands as IBM Watson spaces traffic before pilotless or single pilot airplanes.
Reply
Old 01-27-2018 | 03:09 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
GM and Ford didn't develop a driverless car; TESLA did... .
Here is how that Tesla "driverless car" thing is going. "Autopilot" was on, right into the back of a parked firetruck.

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.news...crash-fire.JPG

Tesla is at level 2. The best system right now, and closest to level 4, is Cadillac's (GM). So if the automotive track record is the one to measure by, Boeing is key to the future and that future is very, very far off.
Reply
Old 01-27-2018 | 04:38 AM
  #9  
Dirty30's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Omnivorous
Everyone is familiar with the phrase "automation airmanship." I think we all know what is lingering over the horizon... somewhere--AUTOMATED airmanship.

What are the projections for when Siri takes over the Boeing (presumably opinion-based)? "Hey Siri, shoot the RNAV" in 10 years? 20? 40?

I suspect we will go single-pilot before the robots take over, doubling the size of the pilot labor force. I am curious to hear what others think about the state of the future.

(Please prove me wrong, by the way).
What's an RNAV? (sarcasm, we don't fly that on the legacy herc)
Reply
Old 01-27-2018 | 05:18 AM
  #10  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

When automated trains are widespread I’ll start to worry. Right now only small monorail type trains are automated. Once Amtrak, subways and commuter trains are automated than maybe we will see it in aviation. But if they aren’t currently automating 18th century technology I don’t think it’ll happen in our lifetime.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices