Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Should we be concerned for our future? >

Should we be concerned for our future?

Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Should we be concerned for our future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2022 | 03:52 PM
  #141  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,261
Likes: 259
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Virologists and constitutional lawyers one week, international relations experts and military strategists the next.

Is there anything the Air Line Pilot cannot master?
Humility?
Old 02-23-2022 | 04:41 PM
  #142  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Virologists and constitutional lawyers one week, international relations experts and military strategists the next.

Is there anything the Air Line Pilot cannot master?
Actually... nothing in this thread is really out to lunch. I spent decades in the mil, started in the cold war and was trained accordingly, and spent the last decade doing major war plans (the ones we tend to talk about here).
Old 02-23-2022 | 06:12 PM
  #143  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Default

https://mobile.twitter.com/bnonews/status/1496683463885402114

https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/1496684236329340928?s=20&t=7H-BFHUGakeBiwOZYsOsPw

Here we go.
Old 02-23-2022 | 06:49 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
The best trained and equipped military is useless when there is incompetent leadership. I've lived through my share of good and bad leadership in the military and the poorly executed Afghanistan withdrawal put the world on notice that the US has idiots telling the military what to do. I am very confident that there were more than a few field grade officers in the five sided puzzle palace strongly advising that there was a plan that should be employed for the withdrawal. They were obviously ignored.
The rest of the world has seen this and other military responses over the past year and the Ukraine situation is due to our poor execution.
The odds of US leadership becoming more competent in military and diplomatic actions in the next 3 years is miniscule and for that reason it would be best if the US military disengaged from all foreign engagement until we have competent leadership at the helm.
The withdrawal would've been a CENTCOM plan - in Tampa, not DC. More than likely it was led by ARCENT/3rd Army. I've worked as a planner in both organizations and IMO you're making a lot of bad assumptions and judgements. I worked NEO & ISIL planning with ARCENT G(J)3-5 and have a WAY better understanding of that culture than you can imagine.
Old 02-23-2022 | 06:54 PM
  #145  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by chihuahua
If Putin wanted the whole thing, he'd have taken it already..
He's taking it now.
Old 02-23-2022 | 06:56 PM
  #146  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default $150 Barrel

$150 a Barrel by early next week. If not sooner.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/24/oil-prices-jump-as-russia-launches-attack-on-ukraine.html

We will be parking aircraft shortly. The pilot shortage will be shut off like a 747 fire Bomber dumping on a campfire.
Old 02-23-2022 | 06:57 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
You're looking at things on a different timeline than Russian leadership. They've been slowly regaining land they lost control of three and a half decades ago.
Less than a century ago, Germany attempted to conquer Russia.
Two centuries ago, France attempted to conquer Russia.
A couple of decades before that, Sweden initiated a war on Russia.
Before that, the Ottoman Empire attacked Russia.
And so on...

Again, depends on one's timeline. I posit that this buffer zone from the west is viewed in terms of centuries rather than years or decades.
Sounds like your making a lot of excuses and justifications for Russian aggression and invasions of sovereign nations. You've articulated Putin's POV very well, now can you do the same for the US, NATO, and Russian 'buffer zone' nations?
Old 02-23-2022 | 07:09 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I’m pretty confident in our ability to defend ourselves against those threats.
Against ICBMs and hypersonic cruise missles?
Old 02-23-2022 | 07:17 PM
  #149  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Full Russian assaults' on the Ukraine underway.
Old 02-23-2022 | 07:26 PM
  #150  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
Against ICBMs and hypersonic cruise missles?
Don't need defense for those, we have deterrence. Putin may have miscalculated cost vs. benefit with UK, but he's not stupid or insane.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
37
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices