Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Should we be concerned for our future? >

Should we be concerned for our future?

Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Should we be concerned for our future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:04 PM
  #821  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 285
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
I'm saying that it doesn't matter. NATO combined, excluding the US, spends 2.5 times more than Russia. Throw in the US, and that number is close to a factor of 10.

You are literally complaining about nothing. And it makes me question your motives.
NATO as a combined military is not equal to the sum of its parts. The European contribution to the military arm of NATO as a capable force is very low, but that’s not really even the point.

The point is really that this was not a signal of strength. Even with a stronger Europe, it’s likely that with the world view of the US as a waning power, this would have happened anyway.

The only thing stopping the stability-instability paradox has been the threat of the firm hand of the US.
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:09 PM
  #822  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
NATO as a combined military is not equal to the sum of its parts. The European contribution to the military arm of NATO as a capable force is very low, but that’s not really even the point.

The point is really that this was not a signal of strength. Even with a stronger Europe, it’s likely that with the world view of the US as a waning power, this would have happened anyway.

The only thing stopping the stability-instability paradox has been the threat of the firm hand of the US.
So you're saying that US isolationism only increases world insecurity? I agree with this statement.
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:10 PM
  #823  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
So you're saying that isolationism only increases world insecurity? I agree with this statement.
They are looking for volunteers over there. When you headed out to join the fight?
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:20 PM
  #824  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 285
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
So you're saying that US isolationism only increases world insecurity? I agree with this statement.
No, I’m saying that unless the US is seen as one that would do something in a conventional war to thwart another nuclear power from attacking another country, that countries like China and Russia are bound to do it. See Crimea 2014 and the rest of Ukraine today. That’s the basic premise of the stability-instability paradox. Don’t they teach this stuff in aviation colleges?
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:23 PM
  #825  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

Old 03-06-2022 | 07:24 PM
  #826  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
No, I’m saying that unless the US is seen as one that would do something in a conventional war to thwart another nuclear power from attacking another country, that countries like China and Russia are bound to do it. See Crimea 2014 and the rest of Ukraine today. That’s the basic premise of the stability-instability paradox. Don’t they teach this stuff in aviation colleges?
That's just a fancy term for Deterrence. And if the US withdraws into an isolationist position, then we are no longer a deterring presence on the world stage.

Everyone complains about the US being the World Police, but they fail to imagine what the world would look like without us at the head of the table. Or who would fill that role when we leave.
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:32 PM
  #827  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
That's just a fancy term for Deterrence. And if the US withdraws into an isolationist position, then we are no longer a deterring presence on the world stage.

Everyone complains about the US being the World Police, but they fail to imagine what the world would look like without us at the head of the table. Or who would fill that role when we leave.
Keep licking that globalist boot. Get that mask on too.
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:33 PM
  #828  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 285
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
That's just a fancy term for Deterrence. And if the US withdraws into an isolationist position, then we are no longer a deterring presence on the world stage.

Everyone complains about the US being the World Police, but they fail to imagine what the world would look like without us at the head of the table. Or who would fill that role when we leave.

No it’s not. Just Google it.
Old 03-06-2022 | 07:40 PM
  #829  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
No it’s not. Just Google it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabil...ox#Assumptions
One of the major assumptions in the concept of mutually assured destruction and the stability-instability phenomenon as its consequence is that all actors are rational and that this rationality implies an avoidance of complete destruction. Particularly the second part of the assumption might not necessarily be given in real-world politics. When imagining a theocratic nation whose leaders believe in the existence of an afterlife which they assume to be sufficiently better than our current life, it becomes rational for them to do everything in their power to facilitate a swift transition for as many people as possible into that afterlife. This connection between certain religious beliefs and politics of weapons of mass destruction has been pointed out by some atheists in order to point out perceived dangers of theocratic societies.


Well as long Putin's not a religious nut...
On BBC’s Global News Podcast Sunday, religion and ethics producer Harry Farley spoke with Ukrainian Bishop Yevstratiy Zoria, a spokesperson for the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, about Putin’s belief that Russia and Ukraine had a “shared spiritual space.”

“What he’s referring to is the arrival of the Eastern Orthodox Church to the region in the ninth century,” Farley said. “He along with many other Russians see Russia’s history dating back to that empire” that existed at the time.

“Moscow and the Russian Orthodox Church developed, became this huge power … within the Orthodox Church. But in 2019, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church split off from Russia and was recognized as independent,” Farley added. “Religion is hugely important for Putin’s identity, for his psyche, he immerses himself in icy water to mark the festival of Epiphany, he wears his baptismal cross.”

Putin Sees Himself as a 'Messianic Figure'

With all this in mind, it’s easy to see why Putin and the state are so interested in religion, particularly when it comes to Ukraine. Harry Farley of the BBC recently said Putin views himself as a “messianic figure, a savior, to reunite Eastern Orthodox churches under Moscow.”
Oh.
Old 03-06-2022 | 08:42 PM
  #830  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: Retired NJA & AA
Default UK Sniper Kills Russian General

A Russian Major General making a trip to the front to get things moving had his trip cut short by a Ukrainian Sniper. (Major General there is like Brigadier General in USA):

https://www.businessinsider.com/russ...7jffKy9Gg8wBzk
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
37
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices