[Breeze] Airways

Reply Subscribe

Page 38 of 526

« First

138

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-11-2019 | 05:01 AM

#371

sailingfun

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 20,880

Likes: 194

Moxy will get a operating certificate without issues. The big question for Moxy is can they sell the business plan to investors to get the desired funding. Based on his original statements on timelines they should be well into hiring employees and be set up and offering tickets for sale for summer travel. Since that is not happening and they have revised their business plan to incorporate older used airframes at a far lower price point it appears their issues might be funding. If there are no major announcements by the end of the year you can be sure it’s funding.

11-11-2019 | 06:54 AM

#372

chrisreedrules

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2012

Posts: 4,601

Likes: 0

From: CRJ FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun

I think the economy may have investors spooked. And start up airlines have never traditionally been a safe investment.

11-22-2019 | 08:03 AM

#373

jamesholzhauer

Banned

Joined: Jun 2019

Posts: 442

Likes: 0

Wonder if this will impact Moxy’s launch

11-22-2019 | 08:17 AM

#374

Flyby1206

SDQ Base Chief

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 6,084

Likes: 46

From: 320 CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer

Wonder if this will impact Moxy’s launch

It certainly won't help. I could see Moxy investors shy away as well as creating distractions/delays to the operational startup phase.

11-22-2019 | 08:29 AM

#375

Texasbound

Line Holder

Joined: Oct 2019

Posts: 426

Likes: 5

Quote:

Neeleman’s own new airline venture, code
named Moxy

You hear that? Were using code names!

11-22-2019 | 06:37 PM

#376

GUFN

Line Holder

Joined: Jan 2017

Posts: 75

Likes: 0

From: GUFN

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesholzhauer

Wonder if this will impact Moxy’s launch

A nuisance complaint. It won’t get much traction; just stirring the **** pot to raise a stink.

11-23-2019 | 05:25 AM

#377

sailingfun

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 20,880

Likes: 194

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUFN

A nuisance complaint. It won’t get much traction; just stirring the **** pot to raise a stink.

I agree the complaint won’t cause any real issues. The fact however he pushed so hard to bring a money man onboard at this late stage shows there are financial issues that are serious.

11-23-2019 | 08:05 AM

#378

Excargodog

Perennial Reserve

Joined: Jan 2018

Posts: 14,253

Likes: 257

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun

I agree the complaint won’t cause any real issues. The fact however he pushed so hard to bring a money man onboard at this late stage shows there are financial issues that are serious.

There are ALWAYS financial matters that are serious with ANY startup. You expect to burn a lot of money before your first dollar of profit.

11-23-2019 | 05:10 PM

#379

sailingfun

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 20,880

Likes: 194

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excargodog

There are ALWAYS financial matters that are serious with ANY startup. You expect to burn a lot of money before your first dollar of profit.

He clearly has been unable to execute his business plan do to a lack of capital. That was not the case when he started JetBlue.

11-23-2019 | 05:30 PM

#380

Excargodog

Perennial Reserve

Joined: Jan 2018

Posts: 14,253

Likes: 257

Quote:

Originally Posted by sailingfun

He clearly has been unable to execute his business plan do(sic) to a lack of capital. That was not the case when he started JetBlue.

From the time Jet Blue was incorporated in Aug 1998 until it was awarded an operating certificate in Feb 2000 was 19 months. Seeing as how a name hasn’t been picked yet and their A220s are not yet due to be delivered, saying the airline is behind schedule seems a little premature.