Misdemeanor B
06-06-2019 | 10:49 AM
#22
Moderator
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,077
Likes: 40
I got arrested with a fake ID when I was 20(?) It was a misdemeanor of some sort, can’t remember. I was hired by a regional and later a larger airline without difficulty. Regional was around 7 years removed or so and next airline was around 11+-.
06-06-2019 | 11:31 AM
#23
Disinterested Third Party
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
If I was cited for Disrupting a public meeting while protesting climate change at my state capitol which is a citation when you even utter words to disrupt a meeting how would that affect an interview/hiring being a class b misdemeanor. How would it affect you if you continued to protest and had more than one?
Fortunately you're not very invested in your career to date, and your attitude is lax enough that you don't really seem to care much. The loss won't be that great.
You ask how it will impact your career, then suggest you intend to go back and do it again?
The hiring process is designed to weed out the idiots. Save everyone some time and don't apply.
06-06-2019 | 04:14 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,238
Likes: 67
I’m guessing not.
06-06-2019 | 10:03 PM
#25
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,192
Likes: 239
06-08-2019 | 11:56 AM
#27
Disinterested Third Party
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Another trump supporter rears his ugly head.
Global warming is scientific fact.
That you may not like it, or that the cheetoh in chief chooses to bury his collective small heads in the sand, is irrelevant.
Global warming is scientific fact.
That you may not like it, or that the cheetoh in chief chooses to bury his collective small heads in the sand, is irrelevant.
06-08-2019 | 02:28 PM
#28
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,192
Likes: 239
Science has a lot of facts, if you count boiling points and vapor pressures and stuff. But global warming is a hypothesis.
That’s not necessarily a bad thing. If it survives enough challenges it becomes the predominant theory. But even then it isn’t a fact. Ptolemy’s heliocentric theory of the universe survived for 1400 years before Copernicus trumped his hand.
That’s not necessarily a bad thing. If it survives enough challenges it becomes the predominant theory. But even then it isn’t a fact. Ptolemy’s heliocentric theory of the universe survived for 1400 years before Copernicus trumped his hand.
06-08-2019 | 05:44 PM
#29
Disinterested Third Party
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Science has a lot of facts, if you count boiling points and vapor pressures and stuff. But global warming is a hypothesis.
That’s not necessarily a bad thing. If it survives enough challenges it becomes the predominant theory. But even then it isn’t a fact. Ptolemy’s heliocentric theory of the universe survived for 1400 years before Copernicus trumped his hand.
That’s not necessarily a bad thing. If it survives enough challenges it becomes the predominant theory. But even then it isn’t a fact. Ptolemy’s heliocentric theory of the universe survived for 1400 years before Copernicus trumped his hand.
The cause of global warming is under debate, but there is no question whatsoever that global warming is well documented and beyond contest. Climate change is in progress.
06-08-2019 | 06:47 PM
#30
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,192
Likes: 239
Sorry amigo. If someone wants to establish a baseline from historical records of reasonable precision and accuracy, I’d buy off on it as a likely theory. But when you are depending for your historic baseline on a regression equation based upon the width of tree rings, the signal to noise ratio is a little too small for my taste. That is inherently a hypothesis - at least in my book. YMMV. But I’m afraid we will have to agree to differ on this one, buddy.
