![]() |
Turbine pic is a box to check to get your resume on the short stack. Same thing with 4 year degree. Right or wrong it can make a difference and does in many companies when they have to sort out the pile of resume's that come in.
|
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
(Post 1308823)
A jet is a jet, who cares how big it is or how far it flys. PIC time is not SIC time. Always take the upgrade. I'd hire a B1900 CA pilot before any jet FO. A widebody FO is the worst pilot out there. I was so lazy and stupid on the 777. At least a Saab captain is flying a plane.
Ayyemenbrotha |
What does the PIC-type rating for FO do for the TPIC? I have heard they will be able to log the time as PIC when it is there leg to control the aircraft. According to the regs, they are rated as PIC of the aircraft and the one in control of it. Is this null due to the "has the final decision in flight" part?
If that doesn't make sense, I am refering to the fact that all FO in the regionals will now be PIC typed in august, as before they could have 3000hrs and no ATP/PIC-TYPE. |
I actually found some good info/opinions on this. Mostly that you can log it as PIC but the captains decision making skills are what the Legacy carriers want out of TPIC. Post any response along with this if you like.
|
Originally Posted by olympic
(Post 1308798)
I am comparing Captain Saab time to Medium to heavy jet time. So an F/O at Emirates on the A380 who has international experience will not be looked at better than a REGIONAL Captain on a SAAB flying from LGA to Syracuse??
Originally Posted by olympic
(Post 1308837)
So the pilot at Emirates who needed 3000 hours to get hired, has close to 3-4 type ratings with international experience will get the boot while a B1900 CA will get hired .. I just don't buy it.
Originally Posted by ImGoingOutSide
(Post 1354033)
What does the PIC-type rating for FO do for the TPIC? I have heard they will be able to log the time as PIC when it is there leg to control the aircraft. According to the regs, they are rated as PIC of the aircraft and the one in control of it. Is this null due to the "has the final decision in flight" part?
If that doesn't make sense, I am refering to the fact that all FO in the regionals will now be PIC typed in august, as before they could have 3000hrs and no ATP/PIC-TYPE. |
Could someone shed some light on this scenario?
Swould it be better to stay as a SE turbine Capt doing 135 or jump to On demand cargo flying sic in a lear/falcon? |
Originally Posted by Slatsnflaps
(Post 1354153)
Could someone shed some light on this scenario?
Swould it be better to stay as a SE turbine Capt doing 135 or jump to On demand cargo flying sic in a lear/falcon? But if it's going to take you years to get 1000 TPIC, then just go for the jet and work on upgrading in that. |
Originally Posted by ImGoingOutSide
(Post 1354033)
What does the PIC-type rating for FO do for the TPIC? I have heard they will be able to log the time as PIC when it is there leg to control the aircraft. According to the regs, they are rated as PIC of the aircraft and the one in control of it. Is this null due to the "has the final decision in flight" part?
If that doesn't make sense, I am refering to the fact that all FO in the regionals will now be PIC typed in august, as before they could have 3000hrs and no ATP/PIC-TYPE.
Originally Posted by ImGoingOutSide
(Post 1354041)
I actually found some good info/opinions on this. Mostly that you can log it as PIC but the captains decision making skills are what the Legacy carriers want out of TPIC. Post any response along with this if you like.
It could even hurt you...if you apply to a major and list 1000 TPIC and then show up with sole manipulator time as an FO, you will get shown the door and never invited back. They know exactly what they are looking for and it's captain time, ie the guy in charge. If you want to log it for possible use outside 121, keep a separate column. But don't allow any confusion when applying for major airline jobs. I would not even list this time on your resume unless you know that the employer in question will value it. |
Originally Posted by olympic
(Post 1308774)
So Captain SAAB time is better than A320 right seat and above? Nah don't think so.
If you want to make this conversation interesting, ask about A320 FO time compared to Cessna 310 PIC time or Caravan time...but Large turbine PIC to FO time...I can't believe this thread is 4 pages long. As far as keeping your logbook...do not misrepresent your "safety pilot" or "sole manipulator" time on an airline application...you will not be the first...you will not be the last, but it will make an already stressful situation even more stressful. It's really not worth it. What I did that seemed to have worked, is I created a column in my logbook called 121 turbine PIC. I then ONLY logged the most pure T-PIC time. It didn't even make 100 hours difference in the whole scheme of things and I was glad to be able to point to that entry in my logbook and say that all that time was as the Captain...not IOE...no simulators...not Part 91 ferries...not as an FO while manipulating the controls...no safety pilot stuff. I interviewed at Delta, SWA, and Alaska and any questions about my logbook simply stopped after I made that statement. Not saying I wouldn't have gotten a job without doing it, but it at the very least allowed for one less thing to be stressed about in the interview. |
Originally Posted by coronafly
(Post 1307953)
If had the opportunity to upgrade into a turbo prop (Saab) or right seat in a regional jet (E-175) which would be the best choice long term...
But if this was a choice between upgrading into a Saab or getting hired at JetBlue or Spirit on the A320, I'd take the LCC. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands