Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Possible cheap way to build time >

Possible cheap way to build time

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Possible cheap way to build time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2014, 05:49 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

Originally Posted by ClarenceOver View Post
US aviation denton usually has 3-5 150's sitting on the ramp running. But they are chinese students going back to their own country. Don't know if that makes a difference. I would go crazy sitting on the ramp for 10 minutes let alone hours.
In the end Mother Nature will make them wish they had done otherwise.
badflaps is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 06:34 AM
  #22  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by 727gm View Post
Join a glider club or buy a glider and fly it a lot...
I don't think these guys want to fly a lot to begin with. That's the whole problem.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 11:57 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

I agree with everyone else that this would be a waste of your own time because your 1,000 hours of ramp time will just make others wonder why someone with that much time is so terrible.

But, I do not see anyone getting violated by the FAA or destroying an engine over this. The FAA does not have enough enforcement power to police ramps for this and I really don't think someone on the ramp would report seeing a 150 do a 2 hour runup. They would just assume it is a MX issue or something else. The only way I can see someone getting reported for this is if they did it at the same airport all the time and blabbed about it. It would be very hard for the FAA to prove which of your flight hours you actually had no intention to fly. And then if they could find what flight hours you logged with no intention to fly, they would have to prove you were going to use those hours towards required flight experience. A crime would only be committed once you applied for your ATP (or another rating) with those hours. And if you do a 1 hour runup and then to 1 trip in the pattern, it would be legal. Also, the engine would be fine for an hour on the ramp due to the airflow from the prop, unless you are doing this in the south in the middle of summer for hours at a time. Mechanics do extended runups all the time on the ramp.

But back to the fact about how stupid this would be. If you are going to buy a plane to build time, there are better ways to cheaply build time. Find someone else who needs to build time to split the plane. Then put some foggles on, do some cross country flights at 55% power, and practice some approaches. 55% power in a 150 will be very slow, but it will burn very little fuel and you can split the fuel costs.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 06:45 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,979
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Mechanics do extended runups all the time on the ramp.
You mean like for 5-15 minutes, or for 2-3 hours?

The risk that you put yourself in doing this is immense. The FAA just needs a preponderance of evidence when you go to apply for a certificate or rating, and if that engine required an overhaul way before TBO or something else bad happened to it, you can bet the owner is going to turn you in quick, no matter how friendly he seemed. Then the questions will start. There's a multitude of ways it could go bad from there. The problem is not sitting there and logging it as you say, it's when you apply for a certificate or rating, except your actions may also be wreckless and you may endanger someone else that uses the airplane, by that accelerated engine wear. Cowlings are meant to move air that is flowing at a certain speed, it's not just about the prop, it's about the air flowing over the gaps/cowl flaps and "sucking" the air through the intakes. While a small 150 engine is likely made with enough cooling to run for a while on the ground, it's still a bad idea. The risk to payoff doesn't seem good IMO.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 06:40 AM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Even if this were a 100% airtight crime, which it isn't but let's say it were, what's the point? There's not much money in aviation compared to other professions, at least until you hit the big time and you aren't going to get hired by a major with an attitude like that anyway. The psych tests will almost certainly weed you out. Do something else such as high-line burglary, corporate embezzling, insurance fraud, insider trading, internet scams, forgery, printing money, drug production or transport, the list has to be endless and the payoffs are too. If you do this fake pilot gig and get hired by a regional you're going to start at $22k and it's highly doubtful you'd pass training with a few hundred hours of genuine flight experience.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:12 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by Bampilot View Post
When I was flight instructing in the desert, international students would fly from phx on a cross country flight and sit at havasu for sometimes a couple hours with engines running. Not sure why but im assuming same intent as op
Not sure what cost savings they'd accomplish for themselves if they're renting the aircraft by the block hour.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:14 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
Not sure what cost savings they'd accomplish for themselves if they're renting the aircraft by the block hour.
Foreign students don't pay for their training. The government or mommy and daddy pay for it usually. They are not flying not trying to save money. Havn't met many foreign students that pay for their training out of their own pocket.
ClarenceOver is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:15 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
In the end Mother Nature will make them wish they had done otherwise.
Why? Because being a cruise pilot and having the protection of a captain is going to get them killed?
ClarenceOver is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:33 PM
  #29  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

The FAA would violate you for sure and probably try to press federal charges. Maybe you'd get off on a technicality but at what cost?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-28-2014, 06:03 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

Originally Posted by ClarenceOver View Post
Foreign students don't pay for their training.
That's not entirely true... Many EU pilots pay for their own training, cost of entry into flying in Europe is much higher than in the US. They come out to the states due to the savings (as crazy as that sounds).
aviatorhi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
Stallog
Career Questions
10
01-15-2010 07:26 PM
nciflyer
Aviation Law
11
07-04-2009 01:29 PM
colinflyin
Regional
10
03-13-2007 09:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices